›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (S2): 306-310.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡工程库水位降与红层岸坡稳定性变化的响应关系研究

宋 琨, 刘 镇,王 磊,杨 举,晏鄂川   

  1. 中国地质大学(武汉) 工程学院,武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2006-12-28 发布日期:2006-12-16
  • 作者简介:宋琨,男,1983年生,岩土工程专业在读本科生
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 40672189);中国地质大学挑战杯课外学术科技作品竞赛资助项目(No. cugtzb0706)

The response research of decline of Three Gorges Reservoir water level on change of red beds bank slope stability

SONG Kun, LIU Zhen, WANG Lei, YANG Jü, YAN E-chuan   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2006-12-28 Published:2006-12-16

摘要: 三峡工程水库运营中,库水位在145~175 m间周期性变化必将引起岸坡地下水位的波动,从而导致岸坡稳定性的响应变化。为此,根据布辛涅斯克非稳定渗流微分方程,采用多项式拟合初始浸润线,求得了库水位匀速下降和定幅度下降时岸坡的浸润线方程;在运用剩余推力法求解岸坡稳定性时考虑了对应的渗透力。以千将坪滑坡北东侧的红层岸坡为实例,分别考虑库水位由156 m匀速下降至145 m和库水位由156 m定幅度下降时岸坡的稳定性。结果表明:库水位以不同速度匀速下降时,降速越大,稳定性系数下降速率越大;地下水的时间滞后效应随降速的增大而明显延迟,但随着库水位的下降,滞后效应将达到一个最大值;库水位定幅度下降时,降幅与岸坡稳定性系数关系曲线呈现下降速率不同的3段;对于千将坪滑坡北东侧的红层岸坡在库水位匀速下降时,其临界降速为1.2 m/d,在库水位定幅度下降时,其临界单次降幅不超过6.0 m。研究结果对三峡工程库区类似岸坡地质灾害预警预报具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 库水降, 红层岸坡, 稳定性, 响应关系, 浸润线, 滞后效应

Abstract: The bank slope always responds well to its stability when the Three Gorges Reservoir water level fluctuates. A research was done to gain the equation of saturation line when the reservoir water level declines from 156m to145m in a steady speed and from 156m to a height in a steady height. Multinomial fitting was introduced to work out the equation for the initial saturation line. As a typical example, the bank slope of red beds to the northeast of Qianjiangping slope was analyzed and the stability coefficient of the bank slope was calculated when the reservoir water level declines. The results show that when the reservoir water level declines in a steady speed, the higher the speed is, the bigger the deducing rate of the stability coefficient is; the higher the declining speed is, the more remarkable the hysteresis of the groundwater is, but the hysteresis will reach to a peak as the water level declines; when the reservoir water level declines in a steady height, the relation curve between the height and the stability coefficient presents three segments with different declining ratios. As to the slope northeast to Qianjiangping landslide, the critical declining velocity is 1.2 meter per day while the reservoir water declines in a steady speed. When the reservoir water declines in steady height, the critical condition is that the single declining height must not beyond 6 meters. It is significant to guide the prewarning and forecasting of geologital disaster which is similar to the bank slope in the Three Gorges Reservoir.

Key words: decline of reservoir water level, red beds bank slope, stability, response, saturation line, hysteresis

中图分类号: 

  • TV 697.2+3
[1] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[2] 李 驰, 王 硕, 王燕星, 高 瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[3] 余 国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜 岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[4] 吴梦喜, 高桂云, 杨家修, 湛正刚, . 砂砾石土的管涌临界渗透坡降预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 861-870.
[5] 王启茜, 周洪福, 符文熹, 叶 飞, . 水流拖曳力对斜坡浅层土稳定性的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 759-766.
[6] 尹晓萌, 晏鄂川, 刘旭耀, 李兴明, . 土体稳定性计算中地下水作用力探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 156-164.
[7] 吴顺川, 姜日华, 张诗淮, 张 敏, . 修正Hoek-Brown强度准则在钻孔稳定性 分析中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 1-13.
[8] 郭红仙, 周 鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
[9] 王克忠, 金志豪, 杨麦珍, 刘先亮, 刘 华, . 取水塔基坑开挖过程倒悬岩坎围堰渗透稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 415-422.
[10] 尹小涛,薛海斌,汤 华,任兴文,宋 罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[11] 谷拴成,周 攀,黄荣宾. 锚杆–围岩承载结构支护下隧洞稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 122-130.
[12] 尹小涛,严 飞,秦雨樵,周 磊,王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[13] 代仲海,胡再强,尹小涛,吴振君,. 工程荷载作用下缓倾角反倾似层状岩质边坡变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 412-418.
[14] 周 勇,令永强,杨校辉, . 考虑附加应力作用的桩锚支护结构稳定性与位移关系研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2913-2921.
[15] 秦雨樵,汤 华,冯振洋,尹小涛,王东英, . 基于聚类分析的边坡稳定性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2977-2983.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 和法国,谌文武,韩文峰,张景科. 高分子材料SH固沙性能与微结构相关性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3803 -3807 .
[2] 庄 宁,朱苦竹,李军伟. 偏压连拱隧道施工的动态模拟及最优化分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2875 -2880 .
[3] 乔金丽,张义同,高 健. 考虑渗流的多层土盾构隧道开挖面稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1497 -1502 .
[4] 肖 忠,王元战,及春宁,黄泰坤,单 旭. 波浪作用下加固软基上大圆筒结构稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2648 -2654 .
[5] 吕祥锋,潘一山,刘建军,唐巨鹏,狄军贞. 孔隙压力对煤岩基质解吸变形影响的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3447 -3451 .
[6] 于 崇,李海波,李国文,刘亚群. 大连地下石油储备库地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3984 -3990 .
[7] 黎剑华,徐 斌,徐满清,刘优平. 层状饱和土体中排桩对简谐荷载隔振效果分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 12 -18 .
[8] 田启强,侯兴民,王自法. 基于块体基础自由振动计算地基阻尼比的新方法[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 211 -216 .
[9] 苏国韶,张克实,吕海波. 位移反分析的粒子群优化-高斯过程协同优化方法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 510 -515 .
[10] 高文华,朱建群,张志敏,黄自永. 基于Hoek-Brown非线性破坏准则的软岩地基极限承载力数值模拟[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 593 -598 .