岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 156-164.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2063

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土体稳定性计算中地下水作用力探讨

尹晓萌1,晏鄂川2,刘旭耀2,李兴明2   

  1. 1. 信阳师范学院 建筑与土木工程学院,河南 信阳 464000;2. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-14 出版日期:2019-01-11 发布日期:2019-01-30
  • 作者简介:尹晓萌,男,1988年生,博士,讲师,从事工程岩土体稳定性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(No. 2011CB710605);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41807240);信阳师范学院“南湖青年学者”奖励计划。

Study on force of underground water in soil stability calculation

YIN Xiao-meng1, YAN E-chuan2, LIU Xu-yao2, LI Xing-ming2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China 2. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2017-10-14 Online:2019-01-11 Published:2019-01-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2011CB710605), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41807240)and Nanhu Scholars Program for Young Scholars of Xinyang Normal University.

摘要: 针对在地下水作用力使用中易出现力的概念混淆、重复计算等问题,论述了土体中的孔隙水压力、浮力、渗透力3种地下水作用力的性质,从能量守恒角度论证了稳定渗流环境下的孔隙水压力与水深和水力坡角相关;探讨了浮力、渗透力两种体积力与边界孔隙水压力的等效关系,论述了在稳定渗流环境下的土体稳定性计算采用土-水分算与土-水合算两种方法时,前者应使用渗透力和土粒浮重度进行平衡计算;后者应使用孔隙水压力和土体饱和重度进行平衡计算。在此基础上,对现行滑坡防治工程的相关规范中滑坡稳定性计算公式中的地下水作用力的不当使用问题进行了探讨,并采用工程实例对其引起的稳定性计算偏差进行分析。结果显示:相关规范中存在渗流条件下孔隙水压力未考虑水力坡角及孔隙水压力与浮力概念混淆的错误,这两种情况都将造成设计偏保守,工程治理时后者将造成较大的经济浪费。

关键词: 土体稳定性, 孔隙水压力, 渗透力, 浮力, 设计规范

Abstract: In order to clarify the concept confusion and to avoid repeated calculation of the force in the groundwater condition, the characteristics of three kinds of groundwater forces in soil, namely pore water pressure and buoyancy and seepage force, are discussed. It is emphasized that the pore water pressure in seepage environment is related to water depth and hydraulic slope according to the energy conservation theory. Then the equivalent relationships for two volume forces (buoyancy and penetration) to the boundary force (pore water pressure) are discussed. The calculation method of groundwater force acting on the separate soil skeleton and the unity of soil skeleton and pore water in a seepage environment is explored. The former should use seepage force and effective gravity of soil particle to calculate equilibrium. The latter should use pore water pressure and saturated gravity of soil to calculate equilibrium. Then the improper use of the groundwater force in present codes for landslide stability analysis related to landslide control engineering is discussed in this paper. In addition, the calculation deviation caused by the improper use of the groundwater force is illustrated in an engineering example. The results show that two problems exist in the relevant specification: pore water pressure is calculated without considering hydraulic slope angle and the concept of pore water pressure and buoyancy are confused. Both cases will cause partial conservative design and engineering management based on the latter case will arise large economic waste.

Key words: soil stability, pore water pressure, seepage force, buoyancy, design code

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 安笑, 潘华利, 欧国强, 孔玲, 李炳志, . 恒定渗流作用泥石流碎屑物质起动判别模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 115-122.
[2] 张小玲, 朱冬至, 许成顺, 杜修力, . 强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩−土 相互作用p-y曲线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2252-2260.
[3] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[4] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[5] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[6] 于丽, 吕城, 段儒禹, 王明年, . 考虑孔隙水压力及非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则下浅埋土质隧道三维塌落机制的上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 194-204.
[7] 张治国, 黄茂松, 杨 轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动 诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[8] 贺桂成, 廖家海, 李丰雄, 王 昭, 章求才, 张志军. 水饱和边坡夹层热-孔隙水-力耦合作用模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1663-1672.
[9] 汪华斌, 李建梅, 金怡轩, 周 博, 周 宇, . 降雨诱发边坡破坏数值模拟两个关键问题 的解决方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 777-784.
[10] 黄朝煊. 塑料排水板处理地基非线性固结计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4819-4827.
[11] 郭帅杰, 宋绪国, . 基于沉桩模拟试验的装配式地下连续墙 沉桩阻力评估方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 269-274.
[12] 赵建军,余建乐,解明礼,柴贺军,李 涛,步 凡,蔺 冰,. 降雨诱发填方路堤边坡变形机制物理模拟研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2933-2940.
[13] 张修照,巫尚蔚,张 超,杨春和,. 不同固结条件下尾矿动孔压演化规律[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 815-822.
[14] 王永洪,张明义,刘俊伟,白晓宇, . 超孔隙水压力对低塑性黏性土桩土界面抗剪强度的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 831-838.
[15] 陈卫忠,马永尚,于洪丹,龚 哲,李香玲,. 泥岩核废料处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 407-416.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!