岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2252-2260.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0934

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩−土 相互作用p-y曲线研究

张小玲1, 2,朱冬至1, 2,许成顺1, 2,杜修力1, 2   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学 建筑工程学院,北京 100124;2. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-23 修回日期:2019-12-30 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-10
  • 作者简介:张小玲,女,1980年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土动力学方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51778020);国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(No. 51421005)。

Research on p-y curves of soil-pile interaction in saturated sand foundation in weakened state

ZHANG Xiao-ling1, 2, ZHU Dong-zhi1, 2, XU Cheng-shun1, 2, DU Xiu-li1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2019-05-23 Revised:2019-12-30 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778020) and the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51421005).

摘要: 在地震荷载作用下,可液化土层中的桩基础往往会由于地基土体液化而发生破坏。在此过程中即使土体最终没有达到完全液化,但由于超孔隙水压力的存在,饱和砂土会发生强度弱化,也会导致土体对桩身水平抗力的降低。此时若不考虑超孔隙水压力对土抗力的影响,仍然采用API规范中的p-y曲线对桩基础进行设计,结果将偏于危险。针对这种情况,首先利用竖向?扭转双向耦合剪切仪对饱和砂土进行了循环扭剪动强度试验,研究了不同弱化状态下饱和砂土的动力特性和弱化参数;然后基于浅层处改进的土楔体理论模型推导极限土抗力公式,并结合深层处的绕桩流动破坏理论模型,得到了任意深度处不同孔压比下的极限土抗力,进而构造了不同弱化状态下饱和砂土地基中桩?土相互作用的p-y曲线。通过研究发现:表征土体强度弱化状态的孔压比对桩?土相互作用的极限土抗力的影响非常显著,孔压比越大,土体强度弱化程度越严重,饱和砂土的极限土抗力值就越小,即横向受荷桩对周围土体的作用随着土体强度弱化程度的增加而降低,反之则增大。

关键词: 桩?土相互作用, 超孔隙水压力, 弱化参数, p-y曲线

Abstract: Under seismic loading, the pile foundations in the liquefiable soil are often destroyed due to the liquefaction of foundation soil. In this process, even if the soil does not reach full liquefaction finally, the strength of saturated sand will be weakened due to the existence of the excess pore water pressure, which will also lead to the decrease of horizontal resistance force of soil. If the influence of excess pore water pressure on horizontal resistance force of soil is not considered, the pile foundations are still designed by adopting the p-y curves in the API standard, and the results will be more dangerous. In this paper, the dynamic cyclic torsional shear tests are carried out for the Fujian standard sands by employing the vertical-torsional coupling shear apparatus, and the dynamic characteristics and weakened parameters of saturated sands in different weakened states are studied. Then the formulas of ultimate soil resistance are derived based on the improved theoretical model of soil wedge at shallow layer. Combined with the theoretical model of flow failure around piles at deep layer, the ultimate soil resistances at different pore pressure ratios at any depth are obtained, and then the p-y curves of pile-soil interaction in saturated sand foundation in different weakened states are constructed. It can be found from the study that the pore pressure ratio, which characterizes the weakened state of soil, has a significant effect on the ultimate soil resistance in pile-soil interaction. With the increase of pore pressure ratio, the weakened degree of soil will be more serious, and the ultimate resistance of saturated sand is smaller. That is to say, the action of the lateral loaded pile on the surrounding soil decreases with the increase of soil weakened degree, and the vice versa.

Key words: pile-soil interaction, excess pore water pressure, weakened parameters, p-y curves

中图分类号: 

  • TU 279.7+6
[1] 万建宏, 郑翔之, 欧阳苇航, 刘思威, 黎学优. 基于高性能有限单元的单桩稳定性分析法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2805-2813.
[2] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[4] 贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[5] 张治国, 黄茂松, 杨 轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动 诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[6] 刘成禹,郑智享,. 改进的基于p-y曲线的基坑围护结构计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 446-452.
[7] 赵明华,陈耀浩,杨超炜,肖 尧. 基于有限杆单元法的陡坡基桩非线性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3020-3028.
[8] 李洪江,童立元,刘松玉,包红燕,杨 涛, . 大直径超长灌注桩水平承载性能的参数敏感性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1825-1833.
[9] 李 亚,李书兆,张 超. 黏土中自升式钻井船插桩对邻近桩基影响的分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1891-1900.
[10] 王永洪,张明义,刘俊伟,白晓宇, . 超孔隙水压力对低塑性黏性土桩土界面抗剪强度的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 831-838.
[11] 刘红军,杨 奇,. 局部冲刷对风机支撑系统承载性能的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 722-727.
[12] 杨耀辉,陈育民,刘汉龙,李文闻,江 强, . 排水刚性桩群桩抗液化性能的振动台试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4025-4032.
[13] 荣雪宁,徐日庆,冯苏阳,仇 涛,. 基于拉格朗日乘数法的大弯矩水平受荷桩研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2605-2612.
[14] 周立朵,孔纲强,彭怀风,顾红伟,朱 希,. 倾斜荷载下群桩承载特性理论分析[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2647-2654.
[15] 李洪江,童立元,刘松玉,顾明芬,陆湛秋,. 软土地基刚柔性桩水平承载位移控制标准研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2676-2682.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 马 亢,徐 进,吴赛钢,张爱辉. 公路隧道局部塌方洞段的围岩稳定性评价[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2955 -2960 .
[3] 颜天佑,李同春,赵兰浩,季薇薇. 三维边坡稳定分析的有限元弹塑性迭代解法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3102 -3108 .
[4] 赵成刚,蔡国庆. 非饱和土广义有效应力原理[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3232 -3236 .
[5] 孔位学,芮勇勤,董宝弟. 岩土材料在非关联流动法则下剪胀角选取探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3278 -3282 .
[6] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[7] 杨育文. 土钉墙计算方法的适用性[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3357 -3364 .
[8] 朱万成,魏晨慧,田 军,杨天鸿,唐春安. 岩石损伤过程中的热-流-力耦合模型及其应用初探[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3851 -3857 .
[9] 兰四清,王玉林,谢康和. 径向双侧壁排水软土地基固结数学模型及解析解[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3871 -3875 .
[10] 薛新华,张我华. 双标量损伤模型及其在Biot固结有限元中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 20 -26 .