岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 11-22.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2277

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析

刘忠玉,夏洋洋,张家超,朱新牧   

  1. 郑州大学 土木工程学院,河南 郑州 450001
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-17 修回日期:2019-04-28 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 作者简介:刘忠玉,男,1968年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学与基础工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51578511)

One-dimensional elastic visco-plastic consolidation analysis of saturated clay considering Hansbo’s flow

LIU Zhong-yu, XIA Yang-yang, ZHANG Jia-chao, ZHU Xin-mu   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • Received:2018-12-17 Revised:2019-04-28 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578511).

摘要: 为进一步深入探讨饱和黏土的固结机制,引入考虑时间效应的统一硬化(UH)本构模型描述饱和黏土变形的弹黏塑性,以及Hansbo渗流方程描述固结过程中的非Darcy渗流,修正了饱和黏土一维固结方程,并利用有限差分法进行了求解。通过与文献中一维流变固结试验结果和理论计算结果的对比,验证了所提计算方法和UH模型的适用性。然后探讨了Hansbo渗流参数及UH模型参数对流变固结过程的影响。计算结果表明:土体的黏滞效应是引起流变固结初期地基不排水面附近出现孔压升高现象的主要原因,而渗流的非Darcy特性增强了这一效应,同时土体的这两个特性还延缓了固结中后期饱和黏土地基中孔压的整体消散和地基的沉降。另外,随着回弹指数和超固结参数的增大,或渗透指数的减小,上述流变固结特性更加明显。但是Hansbo渗流参数和渗透指数对地基最终沉降量均无影响。

关键词: 土力学, 饱和黏土, 流变固结, Hansbo渗流, 弹黏塑性, 有限差分法, 孔隙水压力, 地基沉降

Abstract: To further investigate the consolidation mechanism of saturated clay, the unified-hardening (UH) constitutive model considering the time effect was introduced to describe the elastic visco-plasticity of saturated clay soil as well as the Hansbo’s equation to describe the non-Darcy flow in the consolidation process. Accordingly, Terzaghi’s one-dimensional consolidation equation of saturated clay was modified, and the numerical analysis was conducted by using the finite difference method. In order to verify the applicability of the present method and the UH model, the numerical solutions provided by the present method for the cases that the flow of pore water obeys Darcy’s law were compared with the theoretical and experimental results based on one-dimensional rheological consolidation theory in the literature. Then the effects of Hansbo’s flow parameters and the UH model parameters on the rheological consolidation process were investigated. The calculation results show that the viscous effect of soil leads to an increase of pore water pressure near the impervious boundary at the early stage of consolidation, and the behaviour of the non-Darcy flow enhances this phenomenon. These two characteristics of soil also control the overall dissipation rate of excess pore water in the saturated clay layer, thereby reduce the settlement rates of the soil layer during the middle and late stage of consolidation. In addition, these aforementioned consolidation behaviours become more obvious with the increase of swelling index and overconsolidation parameter of soil. But the parameters of Hansbo’s flow and the permeability index have no effect on the ultimate settlement of the soil layer.

Key words: soil mechanics, saturated clay, rheological consolidation, Hansbo’s flow, elastic visco-plasticity, finite difference method, pore water pressure, ground settlement

中图分类号: 

  • TU 433
[1] 张小玲, 朱冬至, 许成顺, 杜修力, . 强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩−土 相互作用p-y曲线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2252-2260.
[2] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[3] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, 孙嘉宝, . 部分排水条件下饱和黏土 渐近状态本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 485-491.
[4] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[5] 贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[6] 于丽, 吕城, 段儒禹, 王明年, . 考虑孔隙水压力及非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则下浅埋土质隧道三维塌落机制的上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 194-204.
[7] 陈栋, 王恩元, 李楠, . 不同煤岩介质模型的波场特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 449-458.
[8] 张治国, 黄茂松, 杨 轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动 诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[9] 刘忠玉, 崔鹏陆, 郑占垒, 夏洋洋, 张家超. 基于非牛顿指数渗流和分数阶Merchant模型的 一维流变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2029-2038.
[10] 龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[11] 贺桂成, 廖家海, 李丰雄, 王 昭, 章求才, 张志军. 水饱和边坡夹层热-孔隙水-力耦合作用模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1663-1672.
[12] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任 昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[13] 王丽琴, 邵生俊, 王 帅, 赵 聪, 石鹏鑫, 周 彪, . 原状黄土的压缩曲线特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1076-1084.
[14] 汪华斌, 李建梅, 金怡轩, 周 博, 周 宇, . 降雨诱发边坡破坏数值模拟两个关键问题 的解决方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 777-784.
[15] 黄朝煊. 塑料排水板处理地基非线性固结计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4819-4827.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!