岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 1-10.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1852

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

满流条件下管道破损诱发渗流侵蚀的试验研究

刘成禹1, 2,陈博文1,罗洪林1,阮家椿1   

  1. 1. 福州大学 环境与资源学院,福建 福州 350116;2. 地质工程福建省高校工程研究中心,福建 福州 350116
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-29 修回日期:2019-12-12 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 作者简介:刘成禹,男,1970年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事工程地质、隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41272300)

Experimental study of seepage erosion induced by pipeline damage under full pipe flow condition

LIU Cheng-yu1, 2, CHEN Bo-wen1, LUO Hong-lin1, RUAN Jia-chun1   

  1. 1. College of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 2. Fujian Provincial Universities Engineering Research Center of Geological Engineering, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China
  • Received:2019-10-29 Revised:2019-12-12 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • About author:LIU Cheng-yu, male, (1970-), PhD, Professor, doctoral supervisor, mainly engaged in the research of engineering geology, tunnel and underground engineering. E-mail: Liuchengyuphd@163.com
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272300).

摘要: 针对富水砂层中地下管道破损诱发地面沉降的问题,设计了一套可视化试验装置,对骨架粒径d90 =1.45~8.45 mm的11种砂土样、5种满流流速下土体渗流侵蚀诱发地表沉降的规律进行了研究。研究表明:(1)管道破损诱发的土体渗流侵蚀有3种模式,分别为:只突水无沉降、形成土拱并发生沉降和溃砂沉降;(2)土体骨架粒径、破损口尺寸、厚跨比是决定土体产生何种渗流侵蚀模式的主要因素,满流流速主要影响土体沉降范围;(3)管道破损口上方土体形成土拱或溃砂时,土体骨架粒径d90与厚跨比r的关系为:当8.0≥r≥4.2时,d90随r的增大呈抛物线下降;当12.5≥r≥8.0时,d90保持不变;(4)管道破损口上方土体形成土拱或溃砂时,流速为0的初始沉降半径、沉降深度由破损口直径D与土体平均粒径d50的比值(D/d50)决定;沉降半径、沉降深度均随满流流速的增大而线性增大;形成土拱时,沉降半径、沉降深度随流速增大的扩展速度(VL、VH)与D/d50呈对数关系;溃砂时,沉降半径随流速增大的扩展速度VL规律如下:当23.0≥D/d50≥6.0时,VL随D/d50的增加而线性增大,当42.0≥D/d50≥23.0时,VL随D/d50的增大呈对数减小。

关键词: 渗流侵蚀, 沉降, 厚跨比, 流速, 粒径

Abstract: Aiming at the problems of ground settlement induced by the underground pipeline damage in water-rich sand layer, a set of visualization experimental device was designed. For these cases of 11 kinds of sand samples with particle size of skeleton d90=1.45?8.45 mm and 5 kinds of full pipe flow velocity, the law of ground settlement induced by seepage erosion was studied. Research show that: 1) There are three modes of seepage erosion induced by pipeline damage: only water inrush without settlement, soil arching formation with settlement and sand crushing with settlement; 2) The particle size of soil skeleton , damaged mouth size and thick-span ratio are the main factors to determine the seepage erosion mode of soil; 3) When the soil arching or sand crushing is formed in the soil above the damaged mouth of pipeline, the relationship between the particle size of skeleton d90 and the thick-span ratio r is that: when 8.0≥r≥4.2, the d90 decreases parabolically with the increase of r; when 12.5≥r≥8.0, d90 remains unchanged; 4) When the soil arching or sand crushing is formed in the soil above the damaged mouth of pipeline, the initial settlement radius and settlement depth with the flow velocity equal to 0 are determined by the ratio (D/d50) of the damaged mouth diameter D and the average particle size of soil d50; the settlement radius and depth increase linearly with the increase of full pipe flow velocity; when the soil arching is formed, the expansion velocity (VL、VH) of settlement radius and settlement depth with the increase of flow velocity is logarithmic to D/d50. When the sand crushing is formed, the expansion velocity VL of settlement radius with the increase of flow velocity is that, when 23.0≥D/d50≥6.0, it increases linearly with the increase of D/d50; when 42.0≥D/d50≥23.0, it decreases logarithmically with the increase of D/d50.

Key words: seepage erosion, settlement, thick-span ratio, flow velocity, particle size

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[3] 潘锐, 程桦, 王雷, 王凤云, 蔡毅, 曹广勇, 张朋, 张皓杰, . 巷道浅层破碎围岩锚注加固承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1887-1898.
[4] 周恩全, 宗之鑫, 王琼, 陆建飞, 左熹. 橡胶-粉土轻质混合土中管道动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
[5] 徐进, 王少伟, 杨伟涛. 水位变化下可压缩土层的黏弹性耦合变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1065-1073.
[6] 闫超萍, 龙志林, 周益春, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, . 钙质砂剪切特性的围压效应和粒径效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 581-591.
[7] 贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[8] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[9] 张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层 变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[10] 卢谅, 石通辉, 杨东, . 置换减载与加筋复合处理方法对路基不 均匀沉降控制效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3474-3482.
[11] 张治国, 黄茂松, 杨 轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动 诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[12] 张升, 乔春晖, 李希, 沈远, . 考虑级配多样性的颗分试验取样质量理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2555-2562.
[13] 王平, 朱永建, 余伟健, 任恒, 黄钟, . 软弱破碎围岩分次压实力学特性试验分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2703-2712.
[14] 杜文, 王永红, 李利, 朱连臣, 朱浩天, 王有旗, . 双层车站密贴下穿既有隧道案例分析及 隧道沉降变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2765-2773.
[15] 黄大维, 周顺华, 冯青松, 罗锟, 雷晓燕, 许有俊, . 地表均布超载作用下盾构隧道上覆土层 竖向土压力转移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!