基于可靠性理论抗滑桩设计体系的研究

›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (S1): 952-957.

基于可靠性理论抗滑桩设计体系的研究

赵文斌¹，罗文强²，冯永¹

1.中国地质大学（武汉）工程学院，武汉 430074；中国地质大学（武汉）数理学院，武汉 430074

收稿日期:2006-05-25 发布日期:2006-12-15
作者简介:赵文斌，男，1980年生，硕士生，主要从事岩土工程勘察、边坡处理及边坡设计等方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No.40372120）

Study on designing system of anti-slide piles based on reliability theory

ZHAO Wen-bin¹, LUO Wen-qiang², FENG Yong¹

1. Engineering Faculty, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; 2. College of Mathematics and Physics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2006-05-25 Published:2006-12-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 抗滑桩设计的常规方法是建立在定值基础上的，未能考虑计算参数的随机性与变异性，故在抗滑桩设计中存在局限性：一是不能给出抗滑桩设计的边坡安全度；二是设计中过分保守，造成浪费。可靠性分析法考虑了计算参数的随机性，用严格的概率来度量边坡的安全度，弥补了上述传统抗滑桩设计中存在的不足。基于可靠性分析法，以传统边坡稳定性计算公式为基础，建立了抗滑桩设计的边坡稳定性评价模型，并且运用蒙特卡罗法，采用单参数敏感性分析方法，分析抗滑桩设计各参数对边坡安全系数及可靠性指标的影响。结果表明，岩土体抗剪强度参数、岩土体重度、抗滑桩直径等因素对可靠性指标影响较明显，边坡安全系数对岩土体重度、抗滑桩有效长度、抗滑桩直径等随机变量较敏感。

关键词: 抗滑桩, 可靠性指标, 随机变量, 安全系数

Abstract: The conventional methods for designing of anti-slide piles are based on constant value; it isn’t consider the randomness and variability of the parameters, so the design of anti-slide piles will lead to some limitations: one is the methods can not give the safety of the slope; the second is the relatively conservative designing will lead to waste. But the reliability analysis method that consider the randomness of the parameters can measure the safety by rigidity probability, so that it also can make up difference that lie in the tradition anti-slides piles. Considering the reliability method, basing on computing formula of traditional slope stability, the evaluation model of slope stability is built. Using the M-C method and the single parameter sensitivity analysis method, the parameters in the design of anti-slide piles on safety factor and the reliability index are presented. It is demonstrated that the reliability index is affected obviously by the shear strength parameters, the gravity of rock and soil, the diameter of anti-slides piles, and the safety factors of slope sensibility is higher in some parameters such as rock and soil gravity, pile effective length, and pile diameter etc.

Key words: anti-slide piles, reliability index, random variable, factor of safety

中图分类号:

TU 473

赵文斌，罗文强，冯永，. 基于可靠性理论抗滑桩设计体系的研究[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 952-957.

ZHAO Wen-bin , LUO Wen-qiang , FENG Yong，. Study on designing system of anti-slide piles based on reliability theory[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 952-957.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[2]	吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[3]	魏少伟, 隋颜阳, 杨建民, . 圆形与矩形截面抗滑桩抗滑性能的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 951-961.
[4]	雷达, 蒋关鲁, 孙圣杰, 戚志慧, 李安洪, . 基于振动台试验的抗滑桩加固斜坡桥基研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 127-134.
[5]	马显春, 罗刚, 邓建辉, 上官力, . 陡倾滑面堆积层滑坡抗滑桩锚固深度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 157-168.
[6]	尹小涛，薛海斌，汤华，任兴文，宋罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[7]	尹小涛，严飞，秦雨樵，周磊，王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[8]	肖国峰，陈从新. 岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[9]	许明，唐亚锋，刘先珊，罗斌，唐道勇，. 自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡地震动力响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[10]	李清川，李术才，王汉鹏，张红军，张冰，张玉强,. 上覆流沙层隧道开挖面稳定性分析与数值试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2681-2690.
[11]	严敏嘉，夏元友，刘婷婷. 地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[12]	温树杰，梁超，宋亮亮，刘刚,. 基于最小势能法的三维临界滑裂面搜索方法[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2708-2714.
[13]	张海涛，罗先启，沈辉，毕金锋. 基于矢量和的滑面应力抗滑稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1691-1698.
[14]	毛坚强，徐骏，杨磊，. 滑体段采用m法模型的抗滑桩计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1197-1202.
[15]	储召军，石少卿，孙建虎，李季，崔廉明,. 基于模型试验的桩间距对组合式钢管抗滑桩抗滑效果的影响分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 848-853.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed