岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 127-134.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1007

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于振动台试验的抗滑桩加固斜坡桥基研究

雷 达1, 2,蒋关鲁1, 2,孙圣杰1, 2,戚志慧1, 2,李安洪3   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031; 3. 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-19 出版日期:2019-01-11 发布日期:2019-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 蒋关鲁,男,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事道路与铁道工程方向的研究工作。E-mail: wgljiang@swjtu.edu.cn E-mail: china722309220@sina.cn
  • 作者简介:雷达,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程防灾减灾方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    铁道部科技研究开发计划重大课题(No. Z2012-061)

Study of bridge foundation on slope reinforced by anti-slide piles on shaking table

LEI Da1, 2, JIANG Guan-lu1, 2, SUN Sheng-jie1, 2, QI Zhi-hui1, 2, LI An-hong3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-Speed Railway Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2017-05-19 Online:2019-01-11 Published:2019-01-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Major Research and Development Project of China Railway Ministry (Z2012-061).

摘要: 基于工程实践中研究斜坡桥基抗震加固的需要,设计并完成前后排抗滑桩加固滑坡桥基的振动台模型试验。通过加载不同频率、加速度峰值的正弦波,分析振动时桥墩基桩、抗滑桩的受力变形规律,探讨滑坡破坏发展过程和动力响应特性。试验结果显示,前后排抗滑桩均应与桥基保持合理距离,有利于桥墩基础的受力变形;受桥梁上部结构的动力影响,桥墩基桩应变沿桩深衰减,衰减速度与土体抗力相关;当后排抗滑桩开裂后,桩身应变骤降,桩后土压力出现卸荷效应,但抗滑桩仍有潜在的承载能力,同时滑坡从稳定性最差的区域开始破坏,逐渐产生频段耦合效应,在后排抗滑桩达到承载极限前,频段耦合效应显著,达到承载极限后,卸荷效应显著。

关键词: 抗滑桩, 桥梁基础, 振动台模型试验, 卸荷效应, 频段耦合效应

Abstract: As the research demands develop in the seismic reinforcement of bridge foundation on slope in engineering practice, a shaking table model test of bridge foundation on a slope reinforced by the front and back row anti-slide piles is introduced, in which the dynamic loading is applied in form of sine waves with different frequencies and peak accelerations. This study emphasis on the analysis of mechanical responses of the bridge foundation and anti-slide piles, and the developing process of landslide and dynamic response performance. Results show that the front and back row anti-slide piles should keep a proper distance to the bridge foundation, so that the mechanical responses of bridge pile foundation are more reasonable. As the dynamic load of upper structure affect bridge foundation greatly, the strain decreases along pile depth and the strain attenuation is related with soil resistance. When the back row anti-slide piles are cracking, the pile strain decreases significantly and the unloading effect appear in soil pressure behind piles. However, there is potential bearing capacity on pile strength. The landslide failure starts in the section dangerous in stability. The frequency-band coupling effect produce gradually before the back row anti-slide piles reaching the limit loading in vibration, and then the unloading effect take over after the limit loading state.

Key words: anti-slide pile, bridge foundation, shaking table model test, unloading effect, frequency-band coupling effect

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[2] 于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[3] 陈冲, 王卫, 吕华永, . 基于复合抗滑桩模型加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3207-3217.
[4] 庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈 苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[5] 魏少伟, 隋颜阳, 杨建民, . 圆形与矩形截面抗滑桩抗滑性能的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 951-961.
[6] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 邱俊杰, 高泽飞, 王智猛, . 整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[7] 张春生, 赖道平, 吴关叶, 徐建荣, 张伯艳, . 强震作用下复杂边坡块体破坏模式 和破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4620-4626.
[8] 张玲, 陈金海, 赵明华. 考虑土拱效应的悬臂式抗滑桩最大桩间距确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4497-4505.
[9] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 高畄成, 陈 苏, 杜修力, . 地震动持时压缩比对可液化地基地震反应 影响的振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 147-155.
[10] 马显春, 罗 刚, 邓建辉, 上官力, . 陡倾滑面堆积层滑坡抗滑桩锚固深度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 157-168.
[11] 孙志亮,孔令伟,郭爱国. 不同含水状态堆积体边坡地震响应特性大型振动台模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2433-2441.
[12] 毛坚强,徐 骏,杨 磊,. 滑体段采用m法模型的抗滑桩计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1197-1202.
[13] 储召军,石少卿,孙建虎,李 季,崔廉明,. 基于模型试验的桩间距对组合式钢管抗滑桩抗滑效果的影响分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 848-853.
[14] 郑 桐,刘红帅,袁晓铭,涂杰文,汤爱平,齐文浩,. 悬臂抗滑桩静、动力学性能试验的全过程[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 854-862.
[15] 陈昌富, 曾松林, 刘一俊. 考虑预应力损失桩-锚结构内力计算的加权残值法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4569-4576.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!