›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 482-488.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.063

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国西南深切峡谷岸坡地应力场基本特征

李 华1,李崇标1,刘云鹏1,韩 刚2,赵其华2   

  1. 1. 中国电建集团 成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,四川 成都 610072; 2. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-09 出版日期:2016-06-16 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 赵其华,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事工程地质、边坡工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhqh@163.com E-mail:743282592@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李华,男,1973年生,硕士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事水电勘察设计方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划(No.2011CB013501);国家自然科学基金(No.41272333)。

Geostress field characteristics of high steep canyon slope in Southwest China

LI Hua1,LI Chong-biao1,LIU Yun-peng1,HAN Gang2,ZHAO Qi-hua2   

  1. 1. Chengdu Engineering Co. Ltd., PowerChina, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2015-01-09 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB013501) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272333).

摘要: 基于西南地区10个大型水电工程95点空间应力测试数据与50点硐壁应力恢复法测试数据,统计分析了边坡地应力场随垂向、水平向深度变化规律,根据主应力量级、倾角变化规律分析边坡浅表部地应力场特征,探讨了西南深切峡谷地区边坡地应力场分布规律。研究表明,(1)边坡应力场在宏观上可划分为浅表部区(0~300 m)与深部区(>300 m);(2)浅表部区主应力量级、倾角波动较为剧烈,而深部区主应力量级、倾角较为稳定,其最大主应力介于15~30 MPa,中间主应力介于10~20 MPa,最小主应力介于5~12 MPa,最大、最小主应力倾角介于0°~30°,最大主应力约为最小主应力的1.5~3.5倍;(3)浅表部区地应力场具有由主应力较小、最大主应力倾角与坡角近平行转变为主应力急剧增高、最大主应力倾角变化不明显,继而转变为主应力量级、最大主应力倾角剧烈波动,最后逐渐转变与深部应力场近于一致的特征。

关键词: 地应力场, 深切峡谷边坡, 中国西南地区

Abstract: This paper discusses the geostress distribution of slope in deep-cutting gorge in Southwest China. Based on 95 test data of spatial stress and 50 test data measured using the method by adit-wall stress restoration from 10 large-scale hydropower projects in Southwest China. The change discipline of geostress field along with vertical depth and horizontal depth can be counted and analysed. Furthermore, the characteristic of geostress field in superficial zone of slope can be discussed according to the magnitude of principal stress and the change rule of dip angle. The results show that: (1) The stress field can be divided into two parts: superficial zone(0-300 m) and deep zone(>300 m) from macroscopic perspective. (2) The magnitude of principal stress and the dip angle is extremely volatile in superficial zone; the magnitude of principal stress and the dip angle in deep zone is stable. The magnitude of maximum principal stress is between 15 and 30 MPa; the magnitude of minor principal stresses is between 5 and 12 MPa; the dip angle is ranged from 0 to 30°, It is apparent that the magnitude of maximum principal stress is 1.5-3.5 times than minor principal stresses. (3) The change characteristics are that the principal stress magnitude in superficial zone changes from low to high and fluctuates violently before to stability while the dip angle of maximum principal stress is transferred from the nearly parallel with slope to high-variability, and then the two gradually shift to a consistent state with deep zone.

Key words: geostress field, high steep canyon slope, Southwest China

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 刘泉声, 王栋, 朱元广, 杨战标, 伯音, . 支持向量回归算法在地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328.
[2] 王庆武,巨能攀,杜玲丽,黄 健,胡 勇,. 拉林铁路桑日至加查段三维地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1450-1462.
[3] 蒙 伟,何 川,汪 波,张钧博,吴枋胤,夏舞阳. 基于侧压力系数的岩爆区初始地应力场二次反演分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4191-4200.
[4] 张社荣,胡安奎,王 超,彭振辉, . 基于SLR-ANN的地应力场三维智能反演方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2737-2745.
[5] 邱道宏 ,李术才 ,张乐文 ,崔 伟 ,苏茂鑫 ,谢富东,. 基于隧洞超前地质探测和地应力场反演的岩爆预测研究[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 2034-2040.
[6] 王金安 ,黄 琨 ,张 然 , . 高陡复杂露天矿边坡地应力场分区非线性反演分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 214-221.
[7] 徐 坤,王志杰,孟祥磊,孙长升. 深埋隧道围岩松动圈探测技术研究与数值模拟分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 464-470.
[8] 丰成君,陈群策,谭成轩,吴满路,秦向辉. 广东核电站地应力测量及其应用[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1745-1752.
[9] 裴启涛,李海波,刘亚群. 南水北调西线工程坝区初始地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 338-344.
[10] 刘泉声,刘恺德. 淮南矿区深部地应力场特征研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2089-2096.
[11] 张乐文 ,张德永 ,邱道宏. 径向基函数神经网络在地应力场反演中的应用[J]. , 2012, 33(3): 799-804.
[12] 汪 波 ,何 川 ,吴德兴 ,耿 萍. 苍岭特长公路隧道地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 628-634.
[13] 景 锋 ,盛 谦 ,张勇慧 ,刘元坤. 我国原位地应力测量与地应力场分析研究进展[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 51-58.
[14] 韩 刚 ,赵其华 ,彭社琴. 白鹤滩水电站坝区深部破裂岩体地应力演化特征[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 583-0589.
[15] 张勇慧 ,魏 倩 ,盛 谦 ,冷先伦 ,景 锋. 大岗山水电站地下厂房区三维地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1523-1530.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!