›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 2059-2064.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.07.028

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深基坑内撑式支护结构综合刚度研究

刘美麟,房 倩,张顶立,侯艳娟   

  1. 北京交通大学 城市地下工程教育部重点实验室,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-13 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 房倩,男,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面研究。E-mail: qfang@bjtu.edu.cn E-mail:14115302@bjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘美麟,女,1990年生,博士研究生。主要从事基坑工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51678035);国家自然科学基金重点项目资助(No. U1234210)。

Research on synthetic system stiffness of strutted retaining structure for deep excavation

LIU Mei-lin, FANG Qian, ZHANG Ding-li, HOU Yan-juan   

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2016-10-13 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678035) and the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1234210).

摘要: 基于Clough系统刚度,提出一种可综合考虑内撑式基坑围护墙、内支撑和墙后土体刚度的支护体系综合刚度表达式,以较好地预测基坑变形。将Clough支护刚度、Bolton支护刚度和文中综合支护刚度应用于天津地铁6号线22个基坑工程469个围护墙测斜案例中,结果表明,基坑围护结构最大变形随着无量纲综合支护体系刚度( )的增大而减小,当 增大到一定值后,其变形值趋于恒定。进一步分析土体不排水抗剪强度调动率,得到天津地铁6号线地铁基坑墙后土体调动率不大于0.6,远小于上限值0.8,说明天津地铁基坑建设具有足够的安全储备。研究成果可为同类工程经济性和安全性设计提供借鉴。

关键词: 墙体侧移, 支护体系刚度, 不排水抗剪强度, 剪应变

Abstract: Based on Clough system stiffness model, this paper introduces a novel synthetic stiffness expression of strut system for excavation. This expression considered the wall stiffness, strut stiffness and the soil stiffness behind the wall, and thus it had substantial advantage to predict the deformation induced by excavation. Clough system stiffness, Bolton system stiffness and the synthetic system stiffness proposed in this paper were applied to measure the tilt of 469 retaining walls in 22 deep excavations of Tianjin subway line 6 engineering. The maximum deformation of the retaining structure in foundation pit decreased with the increase of the stiffness of the dimensionless composite support system. The deformation value tended to be constant, until increased to a certain value. When the mobilized undrained shear strength ratio of soil was further analyzed, it is found that the ratio of the soil behind the wall along Tianjin subway line 6 was less than 0.6. The upper limit value of this ration is 0.8, which indicates that the excavation engineering of Tianjin subway line 6 has sufficient safety reserves. Therefore, research results can provide significant reference for the economic and safety design of similar engineering.

Key words: wall deflection, support system stiffness, undrained shear strength, shear strain

中图分类号: 

  • TV 551.4

[1] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[2] 张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[3] 赵丁凤, 梁 珂, 陈国兴, 熊 浩, 周正龙, . 剪切-体积应变耦合的孔压增量模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1832-1840.
[4] 邱 敏, 袁 青, 李长俊, 肖超超, . 基于孔穴扩张理论的黏土不排水抗剪强度 计算方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1059-1066.
[5] 周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
[6] 蒋水华,曾绍慧,杨建华,姚 池,黄劲松,周创兵,. 不排水抗剪强度非平稳随机场模拟及边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1071-1081.
[7] 周恩全, 朱晓冬, 陆建飞, 王炳辉, . 液化后砂土流体特性测试装置的研发及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4698-4706.
[8] 李瑞山,袁晓铭,李程程. 水平成层场地动剪应变与震动速度关系解析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3623-3630.
[9] 周正龙,陈国兴,赵 凯,吴 琪,马维嘉. 循环加载方向角对饱和粉土不排水动力特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 36-44.
[10] 王 进,朱泽奇,陈 健,付晓东,房 强, . 海相沉积软土的自钻式旁压试验及原位力学特性[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 195-202.
[11] 刘文生,吴作启,梁怀杰,. 南票矿区松散层土体结构性参数试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1725-1732.
[12] 范志强,唐辉明,汪丁建,刘 凯,温 韬. 考虑土体应变软化特性的滑坡抗滑桩设计推力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 665-672.
[13] 代金秋,苏仲杰,赵明超,项宇航,. 粉质黏土的真三轴试验及强度特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2534-2540.
[14] 郭小青 ,朱 斌 ,刘晋超 ,熊 根 ,黄根清 , . 珠江口海洋软土不排水抗剪强度及循环弱化特性试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1005-1012.
[15] 张希栋,骆亚生. 双向动荷载下黄土的动剪切模量特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2591-2598.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!