›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 3378-3384.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.11.038

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

减饱和松砂静态液化的水-气两相流耦合分析

方 志1, 2,陈育民1, 2,何森凯1, 2,何 稼1, 2   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-05 出版日期:2017-11-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 陈育民,男,1981年生,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事土动力学与土工抗震领域的教学和科研工作。E-mail:ymchenhhu @163.com E-mail:z1fang @163.com
  • 作者简介:方志,男,1992年生,硕士研究生,主要从事土动力学与土工抗震方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51379067);重点国际合作研究项目(No. 5141001028);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(No. 2015B17314)。

Coupling analysis of water-air two-phase flow in static liquefaction of desaturated loose sand

FANG Zhi1, 2, CHEN Yu-min1, 2, HE Sen-kai1, 2, HE Jia1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2016-12-05 Online:2017-11-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51379067).

摘要: 减饱和法是一种通过减小饱和砂土地基中的饱和度,提高地基抗液化强度的新方法。基于水-气两相流反应与土体骨架变形的耦合模拟方法,建立了单调加载条件下减饱和砂土静态液化的数值分析模型。开展了减饱和松砂的三轴不排水试验数值模拟研究,与室内试验结果对比,发现两相流模型能够准确描述减饱和砂土加载过程中的应力-应变关系、应力路径及孔隙水压力增长规律,验证了两相流模拟方法的正确性。数值分析结果还表明,加载过程中减饱和松砂中的饱和度会增加,直至达到一个稳定值,当围压一定时,减饱和松砂加载结束时的饱和度与初始饱和度呈线性关系;且砂土中气体会在荷载作用下被压缩,使得减饱和砂土在不排水条件下发生剪缩。计算发现,当砂土饱和度从100%减小到94.5%时,孔隙水压力系数B值会减小约80%,最大孔隙压力值会降低40%~50%,不排水剪切强度提高2.0~2.5倍,残余强度会提升10倍以上,由此可知,此为减饱和法抗液化的主要机制,而基质吸力不是减饱和法提高砂土抗剪强度的主要原因。

关键词: 减饱和法, 两相流, 静态液化, 数值分析

Abstract: Desaturation is a new method to improve the liquefaction resistance of foundation by decreasing the saturation degree of saturated sand. Based on the coupling simulation method of water-gas two-phase flow reaction and soil skeleton deformation, a two dimensional numerical model is established to simulate the static liquefaction behavior under monotonic loading conditions. Also numerical simulation of undrained triaxial tests are carried out. By comparing the numerical results with the laboratory test results, it is found that the two-phase flow model shows great accuracy in describing the stress-strain relationship, stress path and pore water pressure growth in the static liquefaction process, which verifies the effectiveness of the two-phase flow simulation method. In addition, the saturation degree of desaturated loose sand during loading process increases until a stable value is reached. While the confining pressure is constant, the saturation degree at the end of loading linearly increases with the initial saturation. At the same time, the air in the sand is compressed under loading, which enables the desaturated sand to develop shear shrinkage with undrained condition. When the initial saturation degree of loose sand is reduced from 100% to 94.5%, pore water pressure coefficient B will decrease by 80%, the greatest pore pressure will decrease by 40%-50%, the undrained shear strength will increase by 2.0-2.5 times, and the residual strength can improve by more than 10 times. Therefore, this is the main mechanism of desaturation method to improve the liquefaction resistance, and the matric suction isn’t the main reason for desaturation method to improve the sand shear strength.

Key words: desaturation, two-phase flow, static liquefaction, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[2] 朱才辉, 崔 晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除 对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[3] 李 宁, 杨 敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[4] 郑黎明, 张洋洋, 李子丰, 马平华, 阳鑫军, . 低频波动下考虑孔隙度与压力不同程度变 化的岩土固结渗流分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1158-1168.
[5] 王建军, 陈福全, 李大勇. 低填方加筋路基沉降的Kerr模型解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 250-259.
[6] 伍海清,白 冰,李小春,刘明泽,何媛媛, . CO2地质封存中储层流体压力演化规律的解析模型[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2099-2105.
[7] 方 志,陈育民,何森凯, . 基于单相流的减饱和砂土流固耦合改进算法[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1851-1857.
[8] 闫澍旺,李 嘉,闫 玥,陈 浩,. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
[9] 阿比尔的,郑颖人,冯夏庭,丛 宇,. 平行黏结模型宏细观力学参数相关性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1289-1301.
[10] 郭浩然,乔 兰,李 远. 能源桩与周围土体之间荷载传递模型的改进及其桩身承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4042-4052.
[11] 李一凡,董世明,潘 鑫,李念斌,原 野. 砂岩的I/III复合型断裂试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4063-4070.
[12] 郭 洋,李 清,徐文龙,钱 路,田 策. 条形药包爆破预制贯通裂纹动态断裂过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3882-3890.
[13] 刘天翔,王忠福, . 隧道正交穿越深厚滑坡体的相互影响分析与应对措施[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 265-274.
[14] 宋许根,陈从新,夏开宗,陈龙龙,付 华,邓洋洋,杜根明,. 竖井变形破坏机制与继续使用可行性探究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 331-342.
[15] 汪 昕,蔡 明, . 地震动在地下采场开挖边界的耦合数值分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3347-3354.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!