岩土力学 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 4325-4334.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0822

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

随钻跟管桩桩-土接触面作用机制 大型直剪试验研究

胡贺松1,陈晓斌2,唐孟雄1,廖湘英2,肖源杰2   

  1. 1. 广州市建筑科学研究院有限公司,广州 广东 510440;2. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-27 出版日期:2018-12-11 发布日期:2018-12-31
  • 通讯作者: 陈晓斌,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事交通岩土领域的研究工作。E-mail: chen_xiaobin@csu.edu.cn E-mail:hesonghu79@126.com
  • 作者简介:胡贺松,男,1979年生,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程检测与监测、施工领域的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(No.2015B020238014);广州市科技计划项目(No.201604016021)。

Investigation on shearing failure mechanism for DPC pile-soil interface in large-scale direct shear tests

HU He-song1, CHEN Xiao-bin2, TANG Meng-xiong1, LIAO Xiang-ying2, XIAO Yuan-jie2   

  1. 1. Guangzhou Institute of Building Science Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510440, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
  • Received:2017-04-27 Online:2018-12-11 Published:2018-12-31
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Funds of Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (2015B020238014) and the Science and Technology (S&T) Program of Guangzhou (201604016021).

摘要: 随钻跟管桩(DPC桩)是一种新型工程桩,其设计方法在工程实践中已得到应用。但是研究现状表明,关于DPC侧摩阻力方面仍有几个关键问题需要专门研究:多个界面导致的结构层破坏模式不清楚、注浆加固机制有待明确和侧阻力参数的精确性有待加强。针对上述问题,开展了DPC桩-土接触面作用机制和破坏模式的大型直剪试验研究。选用粉质黏性土与中密砂土作为代表桩周土,共完成了14组DPC桩-土接触面大型剪切试验,包括8组未注浆及6组注浆试验。基于试验结果,明确了破坏面位于注浆体-土体层的破坏模式;采用线性Mohr-Coulomb强度理论获得了注浆前后接触面剪切强度参数;将试验结果进行了对比,通过对比,揭示了注浆加固机制。试验成果加深了实践中DPC桩设计与施工的理解。

关键词: 随钻跟管桩, 桩-土结构层, 极限侧摩阻力, 大型直剪试验, 破坏模式

Abstract: The drilling with pre-stressed concrete pile cased (DPC) pile was newly developed as engineering foundations, and engineers have accepted the designing method in practice. However, several key problems for ultimate shaft frictional resistance still need to be specifically investigated due to insufficient information in the literature. First, the pile-soil interface failure mode is unclear due to its multiple structural layers. Second, the grouting reinforcement mechanism needs to be specified. And last, the values of ultimate shaft frictional resistance need to be determined. This paper presents an experimental investigation on the physical mechanism and failure model on DPC pile-soil interface, which are limited thickness and three structural layers. For this purpose, a series of large-scale direct shear tests were performed. Fourteen large-scale direct shear tests on interfaces were carried out, including eight non-grouted DPC pile-soil interfaces and six grouted DPC pile-soil interfaces. The silt-clay and moderate dense sand were tested as the typical stratum around the DPC pile. The experimental results indicates the shear surface located on the interface between the grouting concrete and the boundary soil. Using the linear Mohr-Coulomb envelopes, the friction angles, and cohesion are obtained for the non-grouted DPC pile-soil interfaces and the grouted DPC pile-soil interfaces. Moreover, the ultimate shaft frictional resistance determined for the tested specimens are obtained. Values of ultimate shaft frictional resistance determined using grouted DPC pile-soil interfaces are compared with those determined non-grouted DPC pile-soil interfaces. Finally, the grouting reinforcement mechanism on DPC pile-soil interface was specified. The findings of this study should lead to a better understanding of the designing and construction of DPC pile at in-situ sites.

Key words: DPC pile (drilling with pre-stressed concrete pile cased), pile-soil interface, ultimate shaft frictional resistance, large-scale direct shear test, failure mode

中图分类号: 

  • TU473
[1] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[3] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[4] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[5] 江南, 黄林, 冯君, 张圣亮, 王铎, . 铁路悬索桥隧道式锚碇设计计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[6] 孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的 自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[7] 王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性 及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[8] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[9] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[10] 刘新荣, 邓志云, 刘永权, 刘树林, 路雨明, . 地震作用下水平层状岩质边坡累积损伤与 破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
[11] 许 江, 瞿佳美, 刘义鑫, 彭守建, 王 威, 吴善康, . 循环剪切荷载作用下充填物对结构面 剪切特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1627-1637.
[12] 李世俊, 马昌慧, 刘应明, 韩玉珍, 张 彬, 张 嘎, . 离心模型试验与数值模拟相结合研究 采空边坡渐进破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1577-1583.
[13] 柯志强, 王环玲, 徐卫亚, 林志南, 吉 华, . 含横向节理的柱状节理岩体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 660-667.
[14] 张春生, 赖道平, 吴关叶, 徐建荣, 张伯艳, . 强震作用下复杂边坡块体破坏模式 和破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4620-4626.
[15] 崔凯, 冯飞, 谌文武, 汪小海, 程富强, . 生石灰为掺料的土遗址裂隙注浆浆液结石体 力学兼容性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4627-4636.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!