青藏铁路含融化夹层路基热力响应监测分析

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0620

岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 2815-2824.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0620

青藏铁路含融化夹层路基热力响应监测分析

王宏磊^{1, 2}，孙志忠¹，刘永智¹，武贵龙¹

1. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院冻土工程国家重点实验室，甘肃兰州 730000；2. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049

收稿日期:2018-04-13 出版日期:2019-07-11 发布日期:2019-07-28
通讯作者: 孙志忠，男，1974年生，博士研究生，副研究员，主要从事冻土环境与工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: sun@lzb.ac.cn E-mail:hongleiwang@lzb.ac.cn
作者简介:王宏磊，男，1990年生，硕士研究生，主要从事冻土环境与工程方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41571064，No. 41630636)；冻土工程国家重点实验室自主研究项目(No. SKLFSE-ZT-09)。

The monitoring analysis of the thermal-mechanical response on embankment with thawed interlayer along Qinghai-Tibet Railway

WANG Hong-lei^{1, 2}, SUN Zhi-zhong¹, LIU Yong-zhi¹, WU Gui-long¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resource, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2018-04-13 Online:2019-07-11 Published:2019-07-28
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571064, 41630636) and the Independent Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering (SKLFSE-ZT-09).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于青藏铁路沿线P32和P33监测断面连续10年的含融化夹层路基的地温和变形场地实测数据，分析了该两处监测断面左路肩下多年冻土人为上限、季节冻结最大深度、融化夹层厚度及多年冻土人为上限附近地温的年变化过程；同时分析了P32和P33监测断面左右路肩的总沉降年变化过程、P32监测断面左路肩地温场对变形的影响及P33监测断面左右路肩地温场差异对左右路肩差异沉降的影响。结果表明：P32和P33监测断面左路肩下多年冻土人为上限逐年下降、季节冻结最大深度基本不变、融化夹层厚度逐年增厚及多年冻土人为上限附近地温逐年升高；观测期内，P32和P33监测断面左右路肩变形均以沉降为主，且P32监测断面左右路肩的总沉降变形量均小于P33监测断面；其中P32监测断面左路肩暖季沉降变形明显，冷季发生轻微的冻胀变形，且发生沉降和冻胀的时间略滞后于路基下部温度场的变化；P33监测断面左右路肩地温场的差异导致左右路肩存在差异沉降，且其差异沉降值随时间逐年变大。

关键词: 青藏铁路, 多年冻土, 融化夹层, 路基稳定性

Abstract: Based on the ground temperature and deformation of the embankment with thawed interlayer at the monitoring sections of P32 and P33 along Qinghai-Tibet railway from 2005 to 2015, artificial permafrost table, maximum seasonal frozen depth, thickness of thawed interlayer and annual process of the ground temperature nearby artificial permafrost table are analyzed. Meantime, annual process of the total settlement of left and right shoulder at P32 and P33 sections, the effect of ground temperature at the left shoulder on deformation at P32 section and the effect of ground temperature difference at the left and right shoulder on its difference of settlement at P33 section are investigated. The results indicate that: at P32 and P33 sections, artificial permafrost table of left shoulder descended annually, maximum seasonal frozen depth remained nearly constant, thickness of the thawed interlayer thickened and the ground temperature nearby artificial permafrost table increased annually; during the monitoring period, the left and right shoulder deformation all performed mainly settlement and its magnitude at P32 section was smaller than at P33 section. Moreover, at P32 section, left shoulder settled during warm season and frost heave occurred slightly during cold season. The occurrence of settlement and frost heave lagged the variation of the ground temperature. The temperature difference can lead to differential settlement under left and right shoulder at the monitoring section of P33, and its value increased annually.

Key words: Qinghai-Tibet railway, permafrost, thawed interlayer, stability of embankment

中图分类号:

U 213.1

王宏磊, 孙志忠, 刘永智, 武贵龙, . 青藏铁路含融化夹层路基热力响应监测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2815-2824.

WANG Hong-lei, SUN Zhi-zhong, LIU Yong-zhi, WU Gui-long, . The monitoring analysis of the thermal-mechanical response on embankment with thawed interlayer along Qinghai-Tibet Railway[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2815-2824.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	张明礼, 温智, 董建华, 王得楷, 岳国栋, 王斌, 高樯. 考虑降雨作用的多年冻土区不同地表土质活动层水热过程差异分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1549-1559.
[2]	张明礼, 温智, 董建华, 王得楷, 侯彦东, 王斌, 郭宗云, 魏浩田, . 考虑降雨作用的气温升高对多年冻土活动层水热影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1983-1993.
[3]	高樯，温智，王大雁，牛富俊，谢艳丽，苟廷韬,. 基于冻融交界面直剪试验的冻土斜坡失稳过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2814-2822.
[4]	田亚护，胡康琼，邰博文，沈宇鹏，王腾飞,. 不同因素对排水沟渠水平冻胀力的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 553-560.
[5]	张开健，孙红，牛富俊，葛修润，. 多年冻土区缓倾角土层斜坡的地震反应[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3469-3475.
[6]	刘明浩，牛富俊，林战举，罗京. 高温冻土区U型块石路基长期降温效果及变形特征研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3304-3310.
[7]	郭春香，吴亚平，蒋代军. 多年冻土区单桩竖向承载力在短期异常气候作用下的响应分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 377-382.
[8]	宇德忠，程培峰，季成，崔志刚,. 高纬度低海拔岛状多年冻土桩基回冻前后承载力的试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 478-484.
[9]	李国玉，马巍，王学力，金会军，王永平，赵迎波，蔡永军，张鹏,. 中俄原油管道漠大线运营后面临一些冻害问题及防治措施建议[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2963-2973.
[10]	刘建军，谢军. 岛状多年冻土管道周围热-水-应力耦合数值模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 444-450.
[11]	孙志忠，马巍，党海明，贠汉伯，武贵龙 . 青藏铁路多年冻土区路基变形特征及其来源[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2667-2671.
[12]	文斌，吴青柏，蒋观利，张鹏 . 模拟退火优化算法的冻土热传导参数反分析[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2401-2408.
[13]	夏才初，黄继辉，卞跃威，唐志成 . 融化作用下多年冻土隧道围岩的弹塑性解及其与支护的相互作用分析[J]. , 2013, 34(7): 1987-1994.
[14]	黄俊杰，苏谦，钟彪，白皓，王武斌 . 多年冻土斜坡路基失稳变形影响因素及特征研究[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 703-710.
[15]	袁堃，章金钊，朱东鹏 , . 深上限-退化型多年冻土路基变形特征分析[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3543-3548.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

青藏铁路含融化夹层路基热力响应监测分析

The monitoring analysis of the thermal-mechanical response on embankment with thawed interlayer along Qinghai-Tibet Railway

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0