岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 2110-2121.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1102

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

浅埋隧道冻结法施工地表冻胀融沉规律及冻结壁厚度优化研究

郑立夫1,高永涛1,周喻1,田书广2   

  1. 1. 北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083;2. 中铁十六局集团有限公司,北京 100018
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-24 修回日期:2019-10-30 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-08-02
  • 作者简介:郑立夫,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程和隧道工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51674015);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.FRF-TP-18-016A3)。

Research on surface frost heave and thaw settlement law and optimization of frozen wall thickness in shallow tunnel using freezing method

ZHENG Li-fu1, GAO Yong-tao1, ZHOU Yu1, TIAN Shu-guang2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mine, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. China Railway 16th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100018, China
  • Received:2019-06-24 Revised:2019-10-30 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-08-02
  • Contact: 高永涛,男,1962年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程和采矿工程方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail: 13901039214@163.com E-mail: lifuzhengustb@126.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51674015) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (FRF-TP-18-016A3).

摘要: 浅埋隧道对地表冻胀、融沉变形有严格要求。针对珠机城际轨道交通项目联络通道冻结壁设计改进问题,基于热?力耦合理论,利用有限差分数值计算方法对冻结法施工全过程进行模拟,通过比较研究不同厚度冻结壁模型引起的地表冻胀、融沉变形及隧道管片变形规律,实现冻结壁厚度的优化设计。研究表明:(1)该数值模型可有效模拟地表冻胀、融沉变形,利用已查明数值误差对计算结果进行折减可得到较为准确的实际变形预测值;(2)不同模型地表冻胀、融沉规律大致相同,但变形量及影响范围随冻结壁厚度减小呈递减趋势,当冻结壁厚度为2.5 m及以下时变形基本满足规程要求;(3)土体冻胀、融沉变形并非简单的互逆过程,融沉变形通常大于冻胀变形,平均超出量达40%,应特别注意;(4)冻结壁厚度越大相应产生的冻胀力越大,通过优化冻结壁厚度可有效控制隧道管片附加应力及变形的产生,保护已建隧道结构安全;(5)综合选定2.5 m为冻结壁改进厚度,成果直接应用于4#联络通道冻结法施工,经现场监测表明该优化方案有效、可行,对类似工程冻结壁厚度设计具有较好的推广应用价值。

关键词: 浅埋隧道, 冻胀、融沉变形, 热?力耦合理论, 冻结壁, 厚度优化

Abstract: There are strict requirements on surface displacement caused by frost heaving and thawing settlement for the shallow tunnels. To improve the frozen wall design of the contact channel in Zhuhai Urban-Airport Interity Railway transit project, the finite difference numerical calculation method is used to simulate the whole process of the artificial ground freezing method based on the thermal-mechanical coupling theory. The optimal design of the thickness of the frozen wall is achieved by comparing the surface displacement of frost heaving, thaw settlement and the deformation of the tunnel segment in models with different frozen wall thicknesses. Results show that: 1) the finite difference numerical model can effectively predict the development of the surface displacement caused by frost heaving and thaw settlement, and an actual deformation prediction value of high accuracy can be obtained with the known error. 2) The frost heaving and thaw settlement of different models almost have the same feature, but the deformation amount and the influence range decrease with the decrease of the thickness of the frozen wall. When the thickness of the frozen wall is less than 2.5 m, the deformation meets the requirements. 3) The frost heaving and thaw settlement of the soil are not simple reciprocal processes. The thaw settlement is usually larger than the heaving deformation, and the averaged excess amount is around 40%. 4) The greater the thickness of the frozen wall is, the greater the frost heave force is. By optimizing the thickness of the frozen wall, the additional stress and deformation of the tunnel segment can be effectively controlled to protect the structure of the existing tunnel. 5) The thickness of 2.5 m is chosen for the improved frozen wall. The research results are directly applied to the construction of the No. 4 communication channel using the freezing method. Combined with the on-site monitoring test, the deformation of each characteristic point is within a reasonable range, indicating that the optimization scheme is practical and feasible, and can be successfully applied in the design of frozen wall thickness in similar projects.

Key words: shallow tunnel, frost heave and thaw settlement, thermal-mechanical coupling theory, frozen wall, thickness optimization

中图分类号: 

  • U 459.5
[1] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广. 基于流固耦合理论水下隧道冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1029-1038.
[2] 汪大海, 贺少辉, 刘夏冰, 张嘉文, 姚文博. 地层渐进成拱对浅埋隧道上覆土压力影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2311-2322.
[3] 刘阳辉, 胡向东, . 卸载状态下立井冻结壁的力学分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 344-350.
[4] 任建喜,孙杰龙,张 琨,王 江,王东星. 富水砂层斜井冻结壁力学特性及温度场研究[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1405-1412.
[5] 管华栋,周晓敏. 基于围岩相互作用的冻结壁弹塑性分析对比研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 649-655.
[6] 曹雪叶,赵均海,张常光. 基于统一强度理论的冻结壁弹塑性应力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 769-774.
[7] 石荣剑,岳丰田,张 勇,陆 路, . 盾构地中对接冻结加固模型试验(Ⅰ) ——冻结过程中地层冻结温度场的分布特征[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 368-376.
[8] 王华宁,吴 磊,. 斜坡下考虑支护效应浅埋隧道力学响应的时效解答[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 83-93.
[9] 程小虎 ,庞振勇 ,曾东洋 ,曾德光,. 基于极限超载的无衬砌浅埋土质隧道稳定性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 835-841.
[10] 杨 峰 ,郑响凑 ,赵炼恒 ,石杰红 ,阳军生,. 地表超载作用下隧道失稳破坏的上限有限元分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 695-701.
[11] 夏元友 ,陈春舒 ,BAKRI Mudthir ,王智德 ,周 雄,. 浅埋隧道开挖引起的土体水平位移分析[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 354-360.
[12] 蔡海兵 ,彭立敏 ,郑腾龙,. 隧道水平冻结壁强制解冻期地表沉降的预测方法[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3516-3522.
[13] 阳军生,张 箭,杨 峰. 浅埋隧道掌子面稳定性二维自适应上限有限元分析[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 257-264.
[14] 王志伟 ,乔春生 ,宋超业,. 上软下硬岩质地层浅埋大跨隧道松动压力计算[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2342-2352.
[15] 管晓明,傅洪贤,王梦恕. 隧道近距下穿山坡楼房爆破振动测试研究[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1995-2003.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2] 楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于形状改变比能对M-C准则与 D-P系列准则匹配关系的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .
[3] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[4] 孙文静,孙德安,孟德林. 饱和膨润土及其与砂混合物的压缩变形特性[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3249 -3255 .
[5] 马 青,赵均海,魏雪英. 基于统一强度理论的巷道围岩抗力系数研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3393 -3398 .
[6] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 刚性桩复合地基-上部结构动力相互作用体系抗震性能及影响因素分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3505 -3511 .
[7] 贾剑青,王宏图,刘大鹏,安龙奇. 隧洞地表稳定性监测及计算分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3765 -3770 .
[8] 董 诚,郑颖人,陈新颖,唐晓松. 深基坑土钉和预应力锚杆复合支护方式的探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3793 -3796 .
[9] 齐吉琳,马 巍. 冻土的力学性质及研究现状[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 133 -143 .
[10] 刘豆豆,陈卫忠,杨建平,谭贤君,周喜德. 脆性岩石卸围压强度特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2588 -2594 .