岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 2170-2176.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1270

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

砾石土料的湿化变形试验技术难点与解决方法

左永振,程展林,潘家军,周跃峰,赵娜   

  1. 长江水利委员会长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-15 接受日期:2022-10-08 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-16
  • 作者简介:左永振,男,1980年生,硕士,正高级工程师,主要从事粗粒土的力学特性试验研究和岩土力学CT可视化技术研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金联合基金重点项目(No.U21A20158,No.U1765203);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.51979010);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(No.CKSF2021484/YT)。

Difficulties and solutions of wetting deformation test of gravelly soil core wall material

ZUO Yong-zhen, CHENG Zhan-lin, PAN Jia-jun, ZHOU Yue-feng, ZHAO Na   

  1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2022-08-15 Accepted:2022-10-08 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Project of the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20158, U1765203), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979010) and the Special Fund of Chinese Central Government for Basic Scientific Research Operations in Commonweal Research Institute (CKSF2021484/YT).

摘要: 砾石土心墙料的大尺寸样品湿化变形试验难度极大,这主要是砾石土料的性质决定了其饱和固结排水困难、样品难以达到饱和状态、试验周期太长。从试验技术、测试方法等方面进行攻关,分析试验成果出现偏差的原因并修正,针对砾石土湿化变形离散性大、存在应力饱和问题,进行了艰难地研究探索。通过对湿化试验过程中的体变修正、进水量修正、饱和度实时计算、成果离散性处理等关键细节的严格把控,最终成功地完成了典型砾石土料的湿化变形试验,获得了规律性较好的砾石土心墙料湿化变形成果。试验过程中出现的异于常规的现象,如围压施加过程中三轴压力室的整体向上变形、高应力状态下没有湿化变形量等,通过试验数据分析和理论分析,最终都得到了合理的解释,加深了对砾石土心墙料土工试验技术和砾石土料湿化变形的认识。

关键词: 砾石土心墙料, 湿化变形, 单线法, 大三轴, 试验技术

Abstract: The wetting deformation test on the large specimens of gravelly soil core wall material is a challenging task, because the physical properties of gravelly soil material lead to difficulties of saturation, consolidation and drainage for a specimen and a long test cycle. In this study, we tackled the above key issues from the aspects of test technology and test methods, analyzed and corrected the deviation of test results in previous research, and performed detailed exploration in the aspects of large discreteness of the wetting deformation of gravelly soil and the problem of stress saturation. Through strict control of key details such as volumetric deformation correction, water inflow correction, real-time saturation calculation and discrete processing of results in the process of wetting test, the wetting deformation test on the typical gravelly soil materials was successfully completed and reasonable wetting deformation results were obtained. Abnormal phenomena in the test, such as overall upward deformation of the triaxial pressure chamber during the application of confining pressure and no obvious wetting deformation under high stress, have been reasonably explained through data and theoretical analyses. The understanding of geotechnical test technology and wetting deformation of gravelly soil materials has been deepened.

Key words: gravelly soil core material, wetting deformation, single-line method, large-scale triaxial test, test technology

中图分类号: 

  • TU411
[1] 陈平山, 吕卫清, 梁小丛, 周红星, 王婧, 马佳钧, . 含细粒珊瑚土抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 337-344.
[2] 常洲, 张留俊, 黄平明, 晏长根, 贾卓龙, 徐合清, . 炭质页岩的颗粒破碎及其路用性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3117-3126.
[3] 葛苗苗, 李宁, 盛岱超, 朱才辉, PINEDA Jubert, . 水力耦合作用下非饱和压实黄土 细观变形机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2437-2448.
[4] 介玉新, 张延亿, 杨光华, . 土石料湿化变形计算方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 11-20.
[5] 丁艳辉, 张丙印, 钱晓翔, 殷 殷, 孙 逊. 堆石料湿化变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2975-2981.
[6] 付宏渊, 刘 杰, 曾 铃, 卞汉兵, 史振宁, . 考虑荷载与浸水条件的预崩解炭质泥岩 变形与强度试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1273-1280.
[7] 牛玺荣,姚仰平,陈忠达,. 吕梁山压实花岗岩风化土的强度特性及本构模型[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2833-2840.
[8] 金 磊,曾亚武,张 森. 块石含量及形状对胶结土石混合体力学性能影响的大型三轴试验[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 141-149.
[9] 牛玺荣 ,高江平 ,张恩韶,. 压实花岗岩风化土物理力学性状试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 701-710.
[10] 冯 蕊,何蕴龙. 深厚覆盖层上高砾石土心墙堆石坝变形监测分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 485-491.
[11] 史小萌 ,刘保国 ,肖 杰,. 水泥和石膏胶结相似材料配比的确定方法[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1357-1362.
[12] 杜秦文 ,刘永军 ,曹周阳,. 变质软岩路堤填料湿化变形规律研究[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 41-46.
[13] 褚福永 ,朱俊高 ,殷建华 . 基于大三轴试验的粗粒土剪胀性研究[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2249-2254.
[14] 蒋明镜,胡海军,彭建兵. 结构性黄土一维湿陷特性的离散元数值模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 1121-1130.
[15] 褚福永 ,朱俊高 ,殷建华,. K0固结粗粒土剪胀特性大型三轴试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3431-3436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .