›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 3505-3510.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

冻结粉土三轴压缩变形破坏与能量特征分析

杨玉贵,赖远明,李双洋,董元宏   

  1. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所 冻土工程国家重点实验室,兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2009-08-03 出版日期:2010-11-10 发布日期:2010-11-24
  • 作者简介:杨玉贵,男,1982年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土力学试验及本构模型研究。
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院西部行动计划项目(No. KZCX2-XB2-10);国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(No. 40730736);国家自然科学基金特殊人才培养冰川冻土学科点( No. J0930003/ J0109);国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(No. 2008AA11Z103);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 40801029).

Experimental study of deformation failure and energy properties of frozen silt under triaxial compression

YANG Yu-gui,LAI Yuan-ming,LI Shuang-yang,DONG Yuan-hong   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2009-08-03 Online:2010-11-10 Published:2010-11-24

摘要:

对不同温度和不同围压下的青藏冻结粉土进行了三轴压缩与加卸载试验,得到冻结粉土应力-应变关系曲线、抗压强度等力学参数随温度与围压变化的关系。结果表明,冻结粉土典型应力-应变曲线在低围压下大致可以分为线弹性、峰前塑性变形与峰后软化3个阶段。当? 3 < 3.0 MPa时,应力-应变曲线具有明显的峰后软化现象,随围压的增大,软化现象逐渐减弱,当? 3 达到14 MPa,应变软化现象重新变得明显;冻结粉土的强度与变形模量均随围压的增加先升后降;低围压作用下冻结粉土体积随轴向应变的增加先缩后胀,而高围压下体积变形只有体缩;低围压下冻结粉土体积塑性变形耗散能先是随着体积塑性变形增大而增大,之后由于剪胀而减少,高围压下体积塑性变形耗散能始终增加;剪切塑性变形耗散能与塑性剪应变之间近似成抛物线的关系。

关键词: 冻结粉土, 压缩强度, 应力-应变曲线, 三轴压缩

Abstract:

To study the mechanical characteristics of frozen silt of Qinghai-Tibet, the triaxial compression and the loading and unloading tests were performed at temperatures of -2 °C, -4 °C, and -6 °C under the confining pressures of 1.0-14.0 MPa. The stress-strain curve, strength and other mechanical characteristics of frozen silt were obtained. Results indicate that the stress–strain curves could be divided into three stages: the linear elastic stage, the plastic stage, and the strain-softening stage. When ? 3 <3.0 MPa, the strain-softening stage appeared and mitigated as the increase of confining pressure; when ? 3 increased to 14.0 MPa, the strain-softening stage would appear again. The strength and elastic modulus of frozen silt increased with increase of confining pressure; then decreased with further increase of confining pressures. The volume of frozen silt reduced with the increase of axial strain at first; then expanded with further increase of axial strain under low confining pressures; however, the volume only reduced under high confining pressures. The plastic volumetric strain dissipated energies increased to a peak value with increase of volume under low confining pressures, then decreased with decreasing in plastic volumetric strain for dilatation; but the plastic volumetric strain dissipated energies increased with increasing plastic volumetric strain all the time under high confining pressures. The plastic shear strain dissipated energies increased with increase of plastic shear strain; and the plastic shear strain has a good parabolic relationship with the dissipated energy.

Key words: frozen silt, compressive strength, stress-strain curve, triaxial compression

中图分类号: 

  • TU 445
[1] 高峰, 曹善鹏, 熊信, 周科平, 朱龙胤, . 冻融循环作用下受荷青砂岩的脆性演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 445-452.
[2] 周翠英, 梁宁, 刘镇, . 红层软岩压缩破坏的分形特征与级联失效过程[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 21-31.
[3] 田军, 卢高明, 冯夏庭, 李元辉, 张希巍. 主要造岩矿物微波敏感性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2066-2074.
[4] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[5] 李晓照, 戚承志, 邵珠山, 屈小磊, . 基于细观力学脆性岩石剪切特性演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1358-1367.
[6] 宋洪强, 左建平, 陈 岩, 黎立云, 洪紫杰, . 基于岩石破坏全过程能量特征改进的能量跌落系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 91-98.
[7] 彭守建, 王 哲, 许 江, 大久保诚介, 汤 杨, . 三轴压缩条件下饱水岩石破坏后区荷载 速率效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 72-82.
[8] 崔德山, 陈 琼, 项 伟, 王菁莪, . 黄土坡滑坡饱和滑带土三轴压缩应力松弛试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 209-216.
[9] 张 德,刘恩龙,刘星炎,宋丙堂, . 冻结粉土强度准则探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3237-3245.
[10] 许宏发,柏 准,齐亮亮,耿汉生,马林建,刘 斌, . 基于全应力-应变曲线的软岩蠕变寿命估计[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1973-1980.
[11] 陈卫昌,王思敬,李 黎,张晓平,王彦兵, . 改性料礓石力学性质试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1796-1804.
[12] 马旭强,施锡林,尹洪武,杨春和,李银平,马洪岭,. 三轴压缩下含夹层盐岩破坏机制[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 644-650.
[13] 张晋勋,杨 昊,单仁亮,隋顺猛,薛东朝,. 冻结饱水砂卵石三轴压缩强度试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 3993-4000.
[14] 杜海民,马 巍,张淑娟,周志伟. 围压与含水率对冻结砂土破坏应变能密度影响特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1943-1950.
[15] 贾 珺,肖本林,柯长仁. 基于虚内键模型的三维均质岩石本构关系模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 740-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[2] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[3] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[4] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[5] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[6] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[7] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[8] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[9] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .
[10] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .