›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 1189-1194.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.04.037

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A normal cloud model-based study of grading prediction of rockburst intensity in deep underground engineering

WANG Ying-chao1, 2,JING Hong-wen1, 2,ZHANG Qiang2,YU Li-yuan2,XU Zhi-min3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. School of Resources and Geoscience, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2013-11-21 Online:2015-04-11 Published:2018-06-13

Abstract: Rockburst is a type of geologic hazards frequently occurring in the deep underground engineering construction. The prediction and classification of rockburst remains an unrsolved problem in underground rock engineering. To evaluate the rockburst intensity, a novel comprehensive evaluation model based on the normal cloud model and Delphi method is developed to overcome the issue of fuzziness and randomness in evaluating the rockburst intensity. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the controlling factors of rockburst, four factors are chosen as the indices for the intensity evaluation, including the ratio of uniaxial compressive strength and tensile strength, ?c / ?t, the ratio of tangential stress and uniaxial compressive strength, ?? /?c, the rock brittleness index, Is, and the elastic strain energy index, Wet. The Delphi method is adopted to determine the weighting coefficient for each evaluation index. The normal cloud model is used to calculate the cloud characteristics for each evaluation index in rockburst classification, which generates the normal cloud droplets, and the undetermined mapping between the rockburst intensity and the evaluation index are realized, keeping the randomness in the evaluation process. Finally, the proposed model is validated with a series of typical rock projects. The obtained results show a good agreement with practical rockburst classification, and the accuracy of cloud model is higher than that of the efficacy coefficient method and set pair analysis method. indicating that the normal cloud theory is applicable and effective for classifying the rockburst intensity.

Key words: rockburst, deep underground engineering, cloud model, degree of certainty, Delphi method

CLC Number: 

  • TU 457
[1] LI Tong, FENG Xia-ting, WANG Rui, XIAO Ya-xun, WANG Yong, FENG Guang-liang, YAO Zhi-bin, NIU Wen-jing, . Characteristics of rockburst location deflection and its microseismic activities in a deep tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.
[2] ZHOU Hui, CHEN Jun, ZHANG Chuan-qing, ZHU Yong, LU Jing-jing, JIANG Yue, . Experimental study of the rockburst model material with low-strength and high-brittleness [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2039-2049.
[3] SU Guo-shao, YAN Si-zhou, YAN Zhao-fu, ZHAI Shao-bin, YAN Liu-bin, . Evolution characteristics of acoustic emission in rockburst process under true-triaxial loading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[4] YAN Jian, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, MENG Wei, . Influence of high geotemperature on rockburst occurrence in tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[5] LUO Dan-ni, SU Guo-shao, HE Bao-yu, . True triaxial test on rockburst of granites with different water saturations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.
[6] MEI Shi-ming, HU Xiao-chuan, SU Guo-shao, CHEN Guan-yan, . Model test study of the influence of intermediate principal stress on rockburst in tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3959-3968.
[7] ZHAO Fei, WANG Hong-jian, HE Man-chao, YUAN Guang-xiang, LUO Yao-wu, . Acoustic emission characteristics of granite specimens with different heights in rockburst tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 135-146.
[8] ZHU Si-tao, JIANG Fu-xing, ZHU Hai-zhou, ZHANG Jun-jie, LIAN Hong-quan, HAN Guo-qing, . Study of mechanism of rockburst accident in heading face in high stress area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 337-343.
[9] WANG Zhi-dong, LI Li-yun, CHEN Tao, LIU Bing-quan, . Study of energy release in model tests on pillar rockburst [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 177-185.
[10] XIANG Peng, JI Hong-guang, CAI Mei-feng, ZHANG Yue-zheng. Dynamic energy release mechanism and geometric scale feature of ejection rockburst source [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 457-466.
[11] SI Xue-feng, GONG Feng-qiang, LUO Yong, LI Xi-bing, . Experimental simulation on rockburst process of deep three-dimensional circular cavern [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 621-634.
[12] MA Chun-chi, LI Tian-bin, ZHANG Hang, WANG Jian-feng,. An evaluation and early warning method for rockburst based on EMS microseismic source parameters [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 765-774.
[13] MENG Wei, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, ZHANG Jun-bo, WU Fang-yin, XIA Wu-yang. Two-stage back analysis of initial geostress field in rockburst area based on lateral pressure coefficient [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4191-4200.
[14] LIU Xin-jin, SU Guo-shao, FENG Xia-ting, YAN Liu-bin,YAN Zhao-fu, ZHANG Jie, LI Yan-fang. Dynamic prediction method of laboratory rockburst using sound signals [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3573-3580.
[15] ZHANG Yan-bo, YANG Zhen, YAO Xu-long, LIANG Peng, TIAN Bao-zhu, SUN Lin,. Experimental study of rockburst early warning method based on acoustic emission cluster analysis and neural network identification [J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 89-98.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] TAN Xian-jun, CHEN Wei-zhong, YANG Jian-ping, YANG Chun-he. Study of THM-damage coupling model of gas storage in salt rock with interlayer[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3633 -3641 .
[2] WEI Xing,WANG Gang,YU Zhi-ling. FEM of traffic-load-induced settlement of road on soft clay[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011 -2015 .
[3] WEN Shi-yi, LI Jing , SU Xia , YAO Xiong. Studies of mesomechanical structure characters of surrounding rock failure under complex stress state[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2399 -2406 .
[4] MAO Ning,ZHANG Yao-liang. Typical examples of simple methods to find empirical formulas[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2978 -2982 .
[5] LIU Jie,LI Jian-lin,QU Jian-jun,Cheng Xing,LI Jian-wu,LUO Shi-wei. Multiple factors analysis of influence of developing horizontal displacement at Dagangshan dam abutment slope based on unloading rock mass mechanics[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619 -3626 .
[6] LI Wei-hua, ZHAO Cheng-gang, DU Nan-xin. Analysis of effects of saturated soft interlayer on seismic responses of metro station[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3958 -3963 .
[7] HAN Xian-min. Study of construction technology and mechanical effect of Guanjiao tunnel in shallow-buried sandy stratum in Xining-Golmud 2nd line[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 297 -302 .
[8] JIANG Zheng-wei, PENG Jian-bing, WANG Qi-yao. Adverse geological problems and countermeasure of Xi’an Metro Line 3[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 317 -321 .
[9] LIU Yong-hai, ZHU Xiang-rong, CHANG Lin-yue. Determining preconsolidation pressure by mathematic analysis based on casagrande method[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 211 -214 .
[10] LI Xing-gao, LIU Wei-ning. Discussion on computing water and earth pressures on retaining wall separately[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 419 -424 .