›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (S2): 513-518.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S2.071

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study of large-span underground engineering supporting structure

XIAO Cong-miao1, 2, ZHANG Ding-li1, ZHU Huan-chun3, ZHANG Cheng-ping1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. The Second Artillery Engineering Design and Research Institute, Beijing 100011, China; 3. Itasca Wuhan Consulting China Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2015-04-16 Online:2015-08-31 Published:2018-06-14

Abstract: According to the characteristics of long span underground engineering’s complex structure and high safety risk, the paper establishes a synthetically evaluation system by theoretical analysis, numerical simulation and experience evaluation. Through a variety of plastic mechanical calculation method, the Caquot formula, Fenner formula, modified Fenner and Kastner formulas are applied to project practice; select one method is most suitable analyze way for large span structures in hard rock. Using Q system and engineering analogy, determine the supporting parameters of anchor bolt in large-span underground engineering. The length of anchor bolt depends directly on the excavation span in Q system, at same time we can get support parameters of shotcrete. By analyzing the same level span underground works, determined that cable length should longer than 40% of the underground work’s span. Through the three-dimensional discrete element to evaluate the stability of supporting structures. In numerical calculations, rock strength criterion can be defined by the strain-softening model of HB. Constitutive relations of structural surface can use ideal elastoplastic model in Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion. After applying three rows of prestressed-cables at the upper side wall, the of deformation of side wall is significantly reduced. At the same time, the number of potential instability surrounding rock mass and scope are effective significantly controlled. By stress analysis of supporting structure,it is show that the 60% of the anchor’s axial force is between 2.0-2.25 MN; the underground engineering has a good safety. Through the synthetically evaluation system including plastic area analysis, numerical simulation and experience analysis, the formation of three-in-one evaluation system is reached. This system can be used for large-span support structure’s rationality evaluation. Through the analysis, The supporting design scheme can effectively deal with the failure phenomenon of rock block stability risk. In local lowly safety parts, anchor and anchor-cable stress level is comparatively high, can reduce the anchor-cable’s pretension force and increase the number of random anchor.

Key words: large span, supporting structure, stability, comprehensive evaluation

CLC Number: 

  • TU 375.4
[1] SU Yong-hua, LI Cheng-cheng. Stability analysis of slope based on Green-Ampt model under heavy rainfall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[2] ZHU Yan-peng, TAO Jun, YANG Xiao-hui, PENG Jun-guo, WU Qiang, . Design and numerical analyses of high-fill slope strengthened by frame with prestressed anchor-plates [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[3] LU Hai-feng, MENG Xiang-shuai, YAN Wei, YAO Duo-xi, . Circular sliding solution of mining stability and failure depth of floor layered structure on coal face [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 166-174.
[4] LIU Shun-qing, HUANG Xian-wen, ZHOU Ai-zhao, CAI GUO-jun, JIANG Peng-ming, . A stability analysis method of soil-rock slope based on random block stone model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[5] LIU Hong-yan. Influence of macroscopic and mesoscopic flaws on mechanical behavior of rock mass and slope stability [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[6] NIE Xiu-peng, PANG Huan-ping, SUN Zhi-bin, XIE Song-mei, HOU Chao-qun. Upper bound analysis of seismic stability of 3D reinforced slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[7] ZHU Cai-hui, CUI Chen, LAN Kai-jiang, DONG Yong-qiang. The effects of the degradation of brick-clay structure and demolition of embedded buildings on the stability of Yulin City Wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[8] CHEN Chong, WANG Wei, LÜ Hua-yong, . Stability analysis of slope reinforced with composite anti-slide pile model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3207-3217.
[9] CHEN Jian-gong, LI Hui, HE Zi-yong, . Homogeneous soil slope stability analysis based on variational method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[10] JIANG Ze-feng, ZHANG Ge, ZHU Da-yong, WANG Jun, . Critical sliding field method for slope under anchorage force and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2799-2806.
[11] WANG Hong-lei, SUN Zhi-zhong, LIU Yong-zhi, WU Gui-long, . The monitoring analysis of the thermal-mechanical response on embankment with thawed interlayer along Qinghai-Tibet Railway [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2815-2824.
[12] HAN Tong-chun, LIN Bo-wen, HE Lu, SU Yu-qin, . Three-dimensional slope modelling method and its stability based on coupled GIS and numerical simulation software [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2855-2865.
[13] CHEN Zheng, HE Ping, YAN Du-min, GAO Hong-jie, NIE Ao-xiang, . Upper-bound limit analysis of tunnel face stability under advanced support [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[14] ZHU Ren-jie, CHE Ai-lan, YAN Fei, WEN Hai, GE Xiu-run, . Dynamic evolution of rock slope with connective structural surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1907-1915.
[15] YU Guo, XIE Mo-wen, ZHENG Zheng-qin, QIN Shi-he, DU Yan, . Research on slope stability calculation method based on GIS [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] TAN Xian-jun, CHEN Wei-zhong, YANG Jian-ping, YANG Chun-he. Study of THM-damage coupling model of gas storage in salt rock with interlayer[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3633 -3641 .
[2] WEI Xing,WANG Gang,YU Zhi-ling. FEM of traffic-load-induced settlement of road on soft clay[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011 -2015 .
[3] WEN Shi-yi, LI Jing , SU Xia , YAO Xiong. Studies of mesomechanical structure characters of surrounding rock failure under complex stress state[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2399 -2406 .
[4] MAO Ning,ZHANG Yao-liang. Typical examples of simple methods to find empirical formulas[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2978 -2982 .
[5] LIU Jie,LI Jian-lin,QU Jian-jun,Cheng Xing,LI Jian-wu,LUO Shi-wei. Multiple factors analysis of influence of developing horizontal displacement at Dagangshan dam abutment slope based on unloading rock mass mechanics[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619 -3626 .
[6] LI Wei-hua, ZHAO Cheng-gang, DU Nan-xin. Analysis of effects of saturated soft interlayer on seismic responses of metro station[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3958 -3963 .
[7] HAN Xian-min. Study of construction technology and mechanical effect of Guanjiao tunnel in shallow-buried sandy stratum in Xining-Golmud 2nd line[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 297 -302 .
[8] JIANG Zheng-wei, PENG Jian-bing, WANG Qi-yao. Adverse geological problems and countermeasure of Xi’an Metro Line 3[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 317 -321 .
[9] LIU Yong-hai, ZHU Xiang-rong, CHANG Lin-yue. Determining preconsolidation pressure by mathematic analysis based on casagrande method[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 211 -214 .
[10] LI Xing-gao, LIU Wei-ning. Discussion on computing water and earth pressures on retaining wall separately[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 419 -424 .