›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 687-693.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.010

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Strength characteristics and solidification mechanism of sulphate salty soil solidified with sodium silicate

LÜ Qing-feng1, SHEN Bei1, WANG Sheng-xin2, MENG Hui-fang1, CHANG Cheng-rui1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Western Disaster and Environment Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 2. Geological Hazards Research and Prevention Institute, Gansu Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2015-06-17 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51469001).

Abstract: Chemical consolidation is one of the most effective methods for solving the engineering problems of saline soil, such as salt expansion, collapse and erosion. Based on the unconfined compressive strength test, X-ray diffraction, chemical analysis and scanning electronmicroscope, the solidification mechanism and strength characteristics of the sulphate saline soil solidified by lime, fly ash and sodium silicate are analyzed. The results show that when the lime content is less than 8%, the compressive strength and shear strength of lime-reinforced soil, fly ash and sodium silicate are higher than those of the sulphate saline soil solidified by lime and fly ash; the strengths of the former grow almost linearly with the concentration of sodium silicate. The alkali-activated action on fly ash caused by sodium silicate and adsorption between sodium silicate and saline soil generate mass gels, leading to an increase in contact area between framework grains, a reduction in intergranular pore, and a transformation from point-contact to surface-contact. The grains of saline soil bond each other into 3D framework via gels, resulting in an increase in the strength of saline soil. Meanwhile, the salt expansion behavior of saline soil is also restrained effectively due to the sharp reduction in the content of induced by complex physicochemical reactions as saline soil is solidified.

Key words: sodium silicate, saline soil, strength, microstructure, chemical analysis

CLC Number: 

  • TU 448

[1] XU Gang, ZHANG Chun-hui, YU Yong-jiang, . Experiments of overburden breaking and compression frame of fully mechanized caving face and the prediction model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] GUI Yue, WU Cheng-kun, ZHAO Zhen-xing, LIU Sheng-jun, LIU Rui, ZHANG Qiu-min. Effects of microbial decomposition of organic matter on engineering properties of peat soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[3] LIU Jie, YANG Yu-hua, YAO Hai-lin, LU Zheng, YUE Chan, . Experimental study on treatment of dispersive clay based on different modification methods [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[4] ZOU Xian-jian, WANG Yi-teng , WANG Chuan-ying, . Three-dimensional morphological feature of rock structural surfaces and dominant anti-slip direction using the borehole images [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[5] LI Li-hua, YU Xiao-ting, XIAO Heng-lin, MA Qiang, LIU Yi-ming, YANG Xing, . Mechanical properties of reinforcement about rice husk ash mixed soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[6] GAO Wei, HU Cheng-jie, HE Tian-yang, CHEN Xin, ZHOU Cong, CUI Shuang, . Study on constitutive model of fractured rock mass based on statistical strength theory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[7] ZHAO Yi-qing, WU Chang-gui, JIN Ai-bing, SUN Hao, . Experimental study of sandstone microstructure and mechanical properties under high temperature [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2233-2240.
[8] YUAN Qing-meng, KONG Liang, ZHAO Ya-peng, . An elastoplastic model for energy soils considering filling and bonding effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[9] WU Zai-hai, JI Hong-guang, JIANG Hai-qiang, QI Zhao-jun, KOU Yun-peng, . Study of mechanical properties of frozen saline cemented tailings backfill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1874-1880.
[10] ZHU Nan, LIU Chun-yuan, ZHAO Xian-hui, WANG Wen-jing, . Micro-structure characteristics of structured clay under different stress paths in K0 consolidated drained tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[11] YU Lu, YANG Qing, YANG Gang, ZHANG Jin-li. Analysis of the resistance of elliptical tip of torpedo anchor by plastic limit analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[12] LIU Xin-yu, ZHANG Xian-wei, YUE Hao-zhen, KONG Ling-wei, XU Chao, . SHPB tests on dynamic impact behavior of granite residual soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[13] RONG Chi, CHEN Wei-zhong, YUAN Jing-qiang, ZHANG Zheng, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Qing-yan, LIU Qi, . Study on new sodium silicate-ester grouting material and its properties of grouted-sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[14] LIU Hai-feng, ZHU Chang-qi, WANG Ren, WANG Xin-zhi, CUI Xiang, WANG Tian-min, . Shear test on reef limestone-concrete bonding interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1540-1548.
[15] ZHANG Mao-chu, SHENG Qian, CUI Zhen, MA Ya-li-na, ZHOU Guang-xin. Effect of loading rate on tensile strength of rock materials and morphology of fracture joint surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1169-1178.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!