›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1680-1688.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.06.019

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Observation and back analysis of settlement of piled-raft foundation in soft soil

XIAO Jun-hua1, ZHAO Xi-hong2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, Shandong 250101, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
  • Received:2015-05-21 Online:2016-06-13 Published:2018-06-09

Abstract: The settlement of Shanghai World Financial Center (SWFC), which is piled-raft foundation, is analyzed in this study. Then the corresponding foundation pit resilience, settlement developing with time and structure stiffness are investigated, and the variation of superstructure stiffness is predicted according to the settlement as well. It is found that the settlement progress of deep piled-raft foundation in soft soil is depending on a various of factors such as loading rate, pit resilience, additional stress transferring in the scopes of shaft and its embedded soils, dewatering and so on. The settlement-time curve of foundation is not an ideal hyperbola, even if the loading rate of construction is relatively stable. At the initial stage of building construction, the low settlement rate is mainly related to the rebound of soil deep foundation pit. While the high settlement rate is found when the building reaches completion, which is probably caused by the additional stress that has transferred to the soil layer under pile toe. It is found that 4.5 m thick raft in settlement development is still considered as an elastic body, and the contribution of superstructure stiffness to the raft is limited. Moreover, the superstructure stiffness is gradually formed with the progress of construction. Three methods are employed to conduct the back analysis of settlement of the SWFC, and calculated results are compared with the settlement data. It is shown that in-situ data is fitted well with the results obtained by the Mindlin solution, referring to “Shanghai code”, in which the proper experience coefficient is considered as 0.40-0.55 and the water buoyancy is set as 70%. By analyzing interaction of deep piled-raft foundation in soft soil, the superstructure stiffness should not be overvalued.

Key words: observed settlement, back analysis, structure stiffness

CLC Number: 

  • TU 473

[1] LI Lian-xiang, LIU Jia-dian, LI Ke-jin, HUANG Heng-li, JI Xiang-kai, . Study of parameters selection and applicability of HSS model in typical stratum of Jinan [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[2] DONG Zhi-hong, NIU Xin-qiang, DING Xiu-li, WENG YongHong, HUANG Shu-ling, PEI Qi-tao, ZHANG Lian, . Deformation characteristics and feedback analysis of surrounding rock of underground powerhouse at left bank of Wudongde Hydropower Station [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 326-336.
[3] SUN Ming-she, MA Tao, SHEN Zhi-jun, WU Xu, WANG Meng-shu,. Study of lining sharing surrounding rock pressure in composite lining structure [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 437-445.
[4] WANG Shao-jie, LU Ai-zhong, ZHANG Xiao-li. Analytical method of displacement back analysis for horseshoe tunnel excavated in transverse isotropic rock mass [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 495-504.
[5] LI Jian-peng, NIE Qing-ke, LIU Quan-sheng, YU Jun-chao,. Risk assessment method of karst ground collapse based on weight back analysis [J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1395-1400.
[6] WANG Hong-bo, ZHANG Qing-song, LIU Ren-tai, LI Shu-cai,ZHANG Le-wen, ZHENG Zhuo, ZHANG Lian-zheng. Inverse analysis of seepage field from packer permeability test [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 985-992.
[7] MENG Wei, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, ZHANG Jun-bo, WU Fang-yin, XIA Wu-yang. Two-stage back analysis of initial geostress field in rockburst area based on lateral pressure coefficient [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4191-4200.
[8] TIAN Mao-lin, XIAO Hong-tian, YAN Qiang-gang,. Displacement back analysis of rock parameters of Hoek-Brown criterion using nonlinear regression method [J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 343-350.
[9] YUAN Yan-ling, GUO Qin-qin, ZHOU Zheng-jun, WU Zhen-yu, CHEN Jian-kang, YAO Fu-hai,. Back analysis of material parameters of high core rockfill dam considering parameters correlation [J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 463-470.
[10] ZHANG She-rong, HU An-kui, WANG Chao, PENG Zhen-hui, . Three-dimensional intelligent inversion method for in-situ stress field based on SLR-ANN algorithm [J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2737-2745.
[11] ZHENG Ya-fei, ZHANG Lu-lu, ZHANG Jie, ZHENG Jian-guo, YU Yong-tang,. Multi-objective probabilistic inverse analysis of rainfall-induced landslide based on time-varied data [J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3371-3377.
[12] ZHANG Zhi-zeng , LI Xiao-chang , WANG Ke-zhong,. Uniqueness of displacement back analysis of circular tunnel in transversely isotropic rock mass when considering shear stress [J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 449-460.
[13] WANG Kai-he, LUO Xian-qi, SHEN Hui, ZHANG Hai-tao. GSA-BP neural network model for back analysis of surrounding rock mechanical parameters and its application [J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 631-638.
[14] CHEN Jing-yu , ZHAO Lian-heng , LI Liang , TAN Han-hua,. Back analysis of shear strength parameters based on Excel spreadsheet and upper bound limit analysis method [J]. , 2016, 37(3): 827-834.
[15] PEI Qi-tao, DING Xiu-li, LU Bo, HUANG Shu-ling, FU Jing, HAN Xiao-yu. Two-stage back analysis method of initial geostress field in dam areas considering distribution characteristics of geostress [J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2961-2970.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!