›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 387-394.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2235

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dynamic stability evaluation on Huaping bedding bank slope of Jinshajiang River Bridge in Huali Expressway under seismic action

YIN Xiao-tao1, 2, YAN Fei2, QIN Yu-qiao1, 2, ZHOU Lei1, 3, WANG Dong-ying1, 3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. National Engineering Laboratory for prevention and control of meteorological disasters in land traffic, Broadvision Engineering Consultants, Kunming, Yunnan 650041, China; 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100000, China
  • Received:2016-09-20 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Traffic Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province[2014(A)01, (2016)140(A)] and the Natural Science Foundation of China (51778609, 51608518, 41202226).

Abstract: Seismic stability of Huaping bedding slope of Jinshajiang River bridge in Huali Expressway is studied. Safety factor, slip surface and scope of width 900 m and height 450 m are suggested by Janbu-simplified method based on slide. Safety factors and deformations of seven kinds of seismic working conditions such as horizontal acceleration being 0.00g, 0.10g, 0.15g, 0.20g, 0.25g, 0.30g and 0.35g are respectively computed by strength reduction method of finite elements on basis of Phase2D using quasi-static method, simulated object being model test. After curves of safety factor or defromation and horizontal acceleration of different seismic load conditions are compared with each other. The results show that: (1) Safety factor near to 1.0, the deviation is least, otherwise the deviation and discreteness increase, which is caused by disunity of limit condition defined by the two methods. Critical horizontal acceleration done by safety factor is 0.20g. (2) Fail mode presented by shear strain is bridge pier being tensile-shear fail, sliding in T2 tuff stratum and horizontally sheared out in front. Sensitivity order of deformation response in slope is horizontal displacement more sensitive than vertical displacement than shear strain. Limit value done by deformation evolution is 0.15g-0.20g, corresponding horizontal displacement being 10.2 mm. These are all proved by model test. (3) Finally, the critical horizontal acceleration of Huaping bedding slope comprehensively being 0.2g, safety factors of exceedance probability being 10% for 50 years and that of exceedance probability being 2% for 100 years are respectively 1.2 and 1.1. Huaping slope is safe under current seismic fortification criterion. In practice, safety factor considered material strength reserve is often selected as evaluating indicator of slope stability; but a strong operability and warning displacement considered deformation mechanism is selected for engineering safety monitoring. So, slope stability needed to be estimated by safety factor combined with critical displacement.

Key words: bedding slope, safety factor, critical displacement, critical horizontal earthquake acceleration, stability estimation

CLC Number: 

  • TU 457

[1] XIAO Ming-qing, XU Chen, . Discussion on stability analysis method of tunnel surrounding rock based on critical stable section [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[2] ZHANG Hai-na, CHEN Cong-xin, ZHENG Yun, SUN Chao-yi, ZHANG Ya-peng, LIU Xiu-min, . Analysis of flexural toppling failure of rock slopes subjected to the load applied on the top [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[3] CHEN Zheng, HE Ping, YAN Du-min, GAO Hong-jie, NIE Ao-xiang, . Upper-bound limit analysis of tunnel face stability under advanced support [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[4] WU Guan-ye, ZHENG Hui-feng, XU Jian-rong. Model test study of stability and failure mechanism of three-dimensional complicated block system slope with deeply reinforcement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[5] JU Neng-pan, DENG Tian-xin, LI Long-qi, JIANG Jin-yang, ZHANG Chen-yang. Centrifugal shaking table test on toppling deformation mechanism of steep bedding slope under strong earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 99-108.
[6] YIN Xiao-tao, XUE Hai-bin, TANG Hua, REN Xing-wen, SONG Gang,. Dialectical unity of slope local and global stability analysis methods [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[7] XU Ming, TANG Ya-feng, LIU Xian-shan, LUO Bin, TANG Dao-yong,. Seismic dynamic response of rock slope anchored with adaptive anchor cables [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[8] LI Qing-chuan, LI Shu-cai, WANG Han-peng, ZHANG Hong-jun,ZHANG Bing, ZHANG Yu-qiang,. Stability analysis and numerical experiment study of excavation face for tunnels overlaid by quicksand stratum [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2681-2690.
[9] YAN Min-jia, XIA Yuan-you, LIU Ting-ting. Limit analysis of bedding rock slopes reinforced by prestressed anchor cables under seismic loads [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[10] WEN Shu-jie, LIANG Chao, SONG Liang-liang, LIU Gang,. Search strategy of three-dimensional critical slip surface based on minimum potential energy [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2708-2714.
[11] ZHANG Hai-tao, LUO Xian-qi, SHEN Hui, BI Jin-feng. Vector-sum-based slip surface stress method for analysing slip mass stability [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1691-1698.
[12] LI Ning, GUO Shuang-feng, YAO Xian-chun,. Further study of stability analysis methods of high rock slopes [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 397-406.
[13] WANG Zhen, YE Xiao-ming, LIU Yong-xin,. Improved Janbu slices method considering progressive destruction in landslide [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 675-682.
[14] YIN Guang-zhi, WANG Wen-song, WEI Zuo-an, CAO Guan-sen,ZHANG Qian-gui, JING Xiao-fei,. Analysis of the permanent deformation and stability of high tailings dam under earthquake action [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3717-3726.
[15] CHEN Zu-yu, LI Kang-ping, LI Xu, ZHAN Cheng-ming,. A preliminary study of allowable factor of safety in gravity retaining wall stability analysis [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 1-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!