›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1691-1698.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1218

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Vector-sum-based slip surface stress method for analysing slip mass stability

ZHANG Hai-tao, LUO Xian-qi, SHEN Hui, BI Jin-feng   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240
  • Received:2016-05-27 Online:2018-05-11 Published:2018-06-12
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2011CB013505) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51279100).

Abstract: The vector sum method (VSM) based on real stress state has been applied recently for analysing the slope stability, considering its clear physical meaning. However, the factor of safety (FoS) defined by VSM could be negative in the case where total normal force vector projection is negative, and its absolute value is larger than total shear force vector projection. Moreover, deduced by Pan’s Principle, the direction of shear resistance stress vector of every point on potential slip surface is currently defined to be opposite to that of the projection of the potential slip direction of the possible slip mass on the tangential surface through this point. However, according to the definition of VSM safety factor and Pan’s Principle, the direction of the projection of the potential slip direction on the tangential surface through this point is opposite to that of the total resistance stresses including shear and normal ones. In this study, a vector-sum-based slip surface stress method for analysing slip mass stability was proposed to overcome these two disadvantages above of VSM. The slip surface was treated as a thin slip band, and forces undertaken by an arbitrary element of the slip band was analysed. The direction of the limit resisting shear stress of an arbitrary element was defined as the opposite direction of the real shear stress, and the possible slip direction was defined as the opposite direction of the resultant limit resisting shear force. Finally, FoS was defined as the ratio of the projection of the limit resisting shear force vector sum in the opposite possible slip direction to that of real dynamic shear force vector sum in the possible slip direction. Compared with the limit equilibrium method, the proposed method satisfied the force and moment equilibrium equations and compatibility conditions without any assumption. Compared with the shear strength reduction method, the proposed method defined that the FoS was explicit form avoiding iteration. The classic two-dimension static slope case was used to verify the proposed method with comparisons among main methods for slope stability analysis, which indicated that the proposed method was feasible. Additionally, the proposed method was applied to a three-dimensional engineering case to study its stability during the excavation process, which showed the proposed method could be used for practical application.

Key words: safety factor, vector sum, potential slip direction, limiting shear resistance stress vector, stability analysis

CLC Number: 

  • TU 431

[1] XIAO Ming-qing, XU Chen, . Discussion on stability analysis method of tunnel surrounding rock based on critical stable section [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[2] LIU Yi-yang, SONG Xuan-min, ZHU De-fu, LI Zhu. Dynamic structural mechanical behavior and response characteristics of large key blocks [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[3] WANG Wei, CHEN Guo-qing, ZHENG Shui-quan, ZHANG Guang-ze, WANG Dong, . Study on the vector sum method of slope considering tensile-shear progressive failure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[4] NIE Xiu-peng, PANG Huan-ping, SUN Zhi-bin, XIE Song-mei, HOU Chao-qun. Upper bound analysis of seismic stability of 3D reinforced slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[5] CHEN Jian-gong, LI Hui, HE Zi-yong, . Homogeneous soil slope stability analysis based on variational method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[6] ZHANG Hai-na, CHEN Cong-xin, ZHENG Yun, SUN Chao-yi, ZHANG Ya-peng, LIU Xiu-min, . Analysis of flexural toppling failure of rock slopes subjected to the load applied on the top [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[7] HAN Tong-chun, LIN Bo-wen, HE Lu, SU Yu-qin, . Three-dimensional slope modelling method and its stability based on coupled GIS and numerical simulation software [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2855-2865.
[8] CHEN Zheng, HE Ping, YAN Du-min, GAO Hong-jie, NIE Ao-xiang, . Upper-bound limit analysis of tunnel face stability under advanced support [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[9] WU Guan-ye, ZHENG Hui-feng, XU Jian-rong. Model test study of stability and failure mechanism of three-dimensional complicated block system slope with deeply reinforcement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[10] YU Guo, XIE Mo-wen, ZHENG Zheng-qin, QIN Shi-he, DU Yan, . Research on slope stability calculation method based on GIS [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[11] ZHANG Long-fei, WU Yi-ping, MIAO Fa-sheng, LI Lin-wei, KANG Tian. Mechanical model and stability analysis of progressive failure for thrust-type gently inclined shallow landslide [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4767-4776.
[12] YIN Xiao-tao, XUE Hai-bin, TANG Hua, REN Xing-wen, SONG Gang,. Dialectical unity of slope local and global stability analysis methods [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[13] YIN Xiao-tao, YAN Fei, QIN Yu-qiao, ZHOU Lei, WANG Dong-ying, . Dynamic stability evaluation on Huaping bedding bank slope of Jinshajiang River Bridge in Huali Expressway under seismic action [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[14] DAI Zhong-hai, HU Zai-qiang, YIN Xiao-tao, WU Zhen-jun,. Deformation stability analysis of gentle reverse inclined layer-like rock slope under engineering load [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 412-418.
[15] QIN Yu-qiao, TANG Hua, FENG Zhen-yang, YIN Xiao-tao, WANG Dong-ying, . Slope stability evaluation by clustering analysis [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2977-2983.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!