Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 1019-1028.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1030

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dynamic structural mechanical behavior and response characteristics of large key blocks

LIU Yi-yang1, SONG Xuan-min1, ZHU De-fu1, 2, LI Zhu3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of In-situ Property-improving Mining of Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. College of Mining Technology, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2019-06-14 Revised:2019-08-21 Online:2020-03-11 Published:2020-05-26
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51904200) and the Independent Research Projects of State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (SKLCRSM19KF019).

Abstract: The roof of the stope in the western region is thick and hard. The broken rock often forms large key blocks. The stability of the surrounding rock is poor with leads to strong support response. Thus, investigating the dynamic structural mechanical behavior of blocks is of great significance to the control of stope surrounding rocks in the western region. According to the dynamic structure formed by the relative rotation of key blocks, a kinematic mechanical analysis model is established. In this study, according to the change of geometric relationship between blocks, the relationship between the extrusion area and the angle of rotation is derived, and the dynamic process of the relative rotation of blocks is divided into three rotation stages. Based on the "voussoir beam" theory, the relationship between the extrusion force and the rotation angle of blocks in different stages is deduced, the structural stability and mechanical behavior are analyzed. Combined with the instability conditions, the working resistance of support is taken as the response characteristic, finding the most unstable position of the structure during the turning process, and then a method of calculating support working resistance is developed, and its correctness of the formula is proved by practical cases. The theoretical calculation results show that: with the increase of the rotation angle θ, the extrusion force T1 generally shows an increasing trend. When the blockness i<1, T1 increases or decreases in a quadratic parabola with θ change. However, when i>1, the curve gradually shows a linear change. As the blackness is large, the increase rate of T1 with θ is smaller. From the analysis of instability conditions, it can be revealed that the large key blocks are prone to slip instability in the early stage of rotation, but its anti-rotation deformation instability ability is relatively strong. For the characteristics of large blockness, weak self-stability of the structural and strong response of the support, it is necessary to design a reasonable support working resistance. By analyzing the stress conditions in the three rotation stages, it is found that the most unstable block is at the critical angle between the initial and middle rotation stage. Finally a formula of calculating the working resistance of support is given in the state of instability.

Key words: large key blocks, dynamic structure, extrusion area, stability analysis, response characteristics

CLC Number: 

  • TD 325
[1] NIE Xiu-peng, PANG Huan-ping, SUN Zhi-bin, XIE Song-mei, HOU Chao-qun. Upper bound analysis of seismic stability of 3D reinforced slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[2] CHEN Jian-gong, LI Hui, HE Zi-yong, . Homogeneous soil slope stability analysis based on variational method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[3] HAN Tong-chun, LIN Bo-wen, HE Lu, SU Yu-qin, . Three-dimensional slope modelling method and its stability based on coupled GIS and numerical simulation software [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2855-2865.
[4] YU Guo, XIE Mo-wen, ZHENG Zheng-qin, QIN Shi-he, DU Yan, . Research on slope stability calculation method based on GIS [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[5] ZHANG Long-fei, WU Yi-ping, MIAO Fa-sheng, LI Lin-wei, KANG Tian. Mechanical model and stability analysis of progressive failure for thrust-type gently inclined shallow landslide [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4767-4776.
[6] QIN Yu-qiao, TANG Hua, FENG Zhen-yang, YIN Xiao-tao, WANG Dong-ying, . Slope stability evaluation by clustering analysis [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2977-2983.
[7] LI Qing-chuan, LI Shu-cai, WANG Han-peng, ZHANG Hong-jun,ZHANG Bing, ZHANG Yu-qiang,. Stability analysis and numerical experiment study of excavation face for tunnels overlaid by quicksand stratum [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2681-2690.
[8] ZHANG Hai-tao, LUO Xian-qi, SHEN Hui, BI Jin-feng. Vector-sum-based slip surface stress method for analysing slip mass stability [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1691-1698.
[9] LI Ning, GUO Shuang-feng, YAO Xian-chun,. Further study of stability analysis methods of high rock slopes [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 397-406.
[10] ZHU Yan-peng, YANG Xiao-yu, MA Xiao-rui, YANG Xiao-hui, YE Shuai-hua, . Several questions of double reduction method for slope stability analysis [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 331-338.
[11] NIE Zhi-bao, ZHENG Hong, ZHANG Tan. Determination of slope critical slip surfaces using strength reduction method and wavelet transform [J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1827-1831.
[12] ZHANG Kun, XU Qing, WANG Yi-fan, A Hu-bao. Application of self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm in searching for critical slip surface of slope [J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1503-1509.
[13] FU Gui-jun, ZHANG Si-yuan, ZHANG Yu-jun. A rheological model for dual-pore-fracture rock mass and its application to finite element analysis of underground caverns [J]. , 2017, 38(2): 601-609.
[14] DENG Dong-ping, LI Liang. Three-dimensional limit equilibrium method for slope stability based on assumption of stress on slip surface [J]. , 2017, 38(1): 189-196.
[15] LI Yao, LI Shu-cai, LIU Bin, NIE Li-chao, ZHANG Feng-kai, XU Lei, WANG Chuan-wu,. Forward simulation and complex signal analysis of borehole radar detection for underground adverse geological bodies [J]. , 2017, 38(1): 300-308.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CUI Hao-dong, ZHU Yue-ming. Back analysis of seepage field of Ertan high arch dam foundation[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3194 -3199 .
[2] HE Si-ming, WU Yong, LI Xin-po. Research on mechanism of uplift rock-socketed piles[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 333 -337 .
[3] LIU Qing-bing,XIANG Wei,ZHANG Wei-feng,CUI De-shan. Experimental study of ionic soil stabilizer-improves expansive soil[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2286 -2290 .
[4] KUANG Yu-chun, WU Kai-song, YANG Ying-xin, MA De-kun. Simulation model of drilling process of three-cone bit[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 235 -238 .
[5] DU Wen-qi, WANG Gang. Statistical analysis of earthquake-induced sliding displacements of earth structures[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 520 -0525 .
[6] YAN Zhi-hua, LIU Zhi-wei, LIU Hou-jian. Treatment and parameter selection of high slope of a power plant located in the terraces of Yellow River[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 465 -468 .
[7] XU Zhen-hao , LI Shu-cai , LI Li-ping , HOU Jian-gang , SUI Bin , SHI Shao-shuai. Risk assessment of water or mud inrush of karst tunnels based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1757 -1766 .
[8] ZHONG Sheng ,WANG Chuan-ying ,WU Li-xin ,TANG Xin-jian ,WANG Qing-yuan. Borehole radar response characteristics of point unfavorable geo-bodies: forward simulation of its surrounding rock and filling condition[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1191 -1195 .
[9] MENG Zhen, CHEN Jin-jian, WANG Jian-hua, YIN Zhen-yu. Study of model test on bearing capacity of screw piles in sand[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 141 -145 .
[10] LUO Gang , HU Xie-wen , GU Cheng-zhuang . Study of kinetic failure mechanism and starting velocity of consequent rock slopes under strong earthquake[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 483 -490 .