›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 329-333.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.044

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study of shear strength of silty soils modified with surfactants

WANG Yan1, FU Jun-xing 1, TANG Qiang2,HU An-xiang1, LIU Jia-xin1   

  1. 1. Architectural, Civil Engineering and Environmental College, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China; 2. School of Urban Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215131, China
  • Received:2015-12-03 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (51308310), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LQ13E080007) and the Ningbo Natural Science Foundation of China (2014A610105).

Abstract: Surfactants can entry into soil and ground water environment through a number of ways, such as industrial, agricultural and daily activities, and thus lead to environment pollution and the change of soil behaviour. Silty soils are separately modified with anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) and cationic surfactant cetrimonium bromide(CTAB), then the strengths of modified silty soils are investigated. The internal friction angle become small when modify by surfactants, and the internal friction angle turn to be more and much smaller as increasing the concentration of surfactants. When the concentration of surfactants reached 2%, the internal friction angle of silty soil decreased approximately by 23.9%. The cohesion decreased by 91.8% when adding 2% SDBS to silty soil, namely, the cohesion of SDBS modified silty soil decrease quite a bit, while that of CTAB modified silty soil increase, and the maximum growth rate is 41.8%. The solution pH have a very slight effect on the internal friction of modified silty soil, while the cohesion of surfactants modified silty soil tend to decline as increasing pH. The change of pH can lead to the change of electric charge on soil surface, resulting in changes of electrostatic interaction between soil particles, and influencing the cohesion of silty soils.

Key words: surfactant, modified silty soil, shear strength, cohesion, internal friction angle

CLC Number: 

  • TU 411
[1] LIU Jie, YANG Yu-hua, YAO Hai-lin, LU Zheng, YUE Chan, . Experimental study on treatment of dispersive clay based on different modification methods [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[2] ZOU Xian-jian, WANG Yi-teng , WANG Chuan-ying, . Three-dimensional morphological feature of rock structural surfaces and dominant anti-slip direction using the borehole images [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[3] BAI Xue-yuan, WANG Xue-bin, SHU Qin, . Continuum-discontinuum simulation of effects of internal friction angle on local fracture of circular cavern surrounding rock under hydrostatic pressure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[4] CAI Gai-pin, XUAN Lü-wei, ZHANG Xue-tao, GUO Jin. Investigation into the crushing process in multi-scale cohesive particle model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1809-1817.
[5] YU Lu, YANG Qing, YANG Gang, ZHANG Jin-li. Analysis of the resistance of elliptical tip of torpedo anchor by plastic limit analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[6] LIU Jian-min, QIU Yue, GUO Ting-ting, SONG Wen-zhi, GU Chuan, . Comparative experimental study on static shear strength and postcyclic strength of saturated silty clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[7] FAN Ke-wei, LIU Si-hong, LIAO Jie, FANG Bin-xin, WANG Jian-lei, . Experimental study on shearing characteristics of pebbles-filled soilbags [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[8] TU Yuan, WANG Kui-hua, ZHOU Jian, HU An-feng, . Application of effective stress method and effective consolidation stress method for strength calculation in preloading ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[9] LI Xiao-gang, ZHU Chang-qi, CUI Xiang, ZHANG Po-yu, WANG Rui, . Experimental study of triaxial shear characteristics of carbonate mixed sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[10] WANG Long, ZHU Jun-gao, GUO Wan-li, LU Yang-yang, . Compression model for cohesionless soils and its verification [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 229-234.
[11] ZHANG Chen-yang, CHEN Min, HU Ming-jian, WANG Xin-zhi, TANG Jian-jian, . Effect of fine particles content on shear strength of calcareous sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[12] WANG Huan, CHEN Qun, WANG Hong-xin, ZHANG Wen-ju, . Triaxial tests on fly ash with different compaction and matric suction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[13] XIE Hui-hui, XU Zhen-hao, LIU Qing-bing, HU Gui-yang, . Evolution of peak strength and residual strength of weak expansive soil under drying-wetting cycle paths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[14] LI Xin-ming, KONG Ling-wei, GUO Ai-guo, . Experimental study of ageing effect on mechanical properties of Nanyang undisturbed expansive soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[15] LI Shu-zhao, WANG Zhong-chang, JIA Xu, HE Lin-lin, . Simplified calculation method for cyclic bearing capacity of suction anchors with taut mooring in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!