Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 229-234.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2213

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Compression model for cohesionless soils and its verification

WANG Long1, 2, ZHU Jun-gao1, 2, GUO Wan-li3, LU Yang-yang1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. Jiangsu Research Center for Geotechnical Engineering Technology, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210098, China; 3. Geotechnical Engineering Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China
  • Received:2018-12-05 Revised:2019-05-24 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1508505), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX18_0563), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018B662X14) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1865104, 51479052).

Abstract: The establishment of soil constitutive model is often grounded on the isotropic compression model. Based on the analysis of the isotropic compression characteristics of the cohesionless soils, it is found that the value of the compression index is closely related to the current void ratio and spherical stress. On this basis, an expression of the compression index formulated as a separable function of the current void ratio and spherical stress is established. Then, a three-parameter compression model that describes the compression characteristics of the cohesionless soils is obtained. The comparisons with test data of four types of sands show that the model can properly fit the relationships between void ratios and stress of cohesionless soils with different initial void ratios. Compared with the compression models established by taking the limit compression curve as the refence line, the proposed model is more useful in fitting the relationships between void ratios and stresses of cohesionless soils in low-stress regions. The model also provides a foundation for establishing constitutive models of cohesionless soil.

Key words: cohesionless soil, compression model, void ratio, stress

CLC Number: 

  • TU 411
[1] WANG Ke, SHENG Jin-chang, GAO Hui-cai, TIAN Xiao-dan, ZHAN Mei-li, LUO Yu-long, . Study on seepage characteristics of rough crack under coupling of stress-seepage erosion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2] LUO Bin-yu, YE Yi-cheng, HU Nan-yan, LI Peng-cheng, CHEN Chang-zhao, . Mohr’s circle analysis and numerical simulation of stress state of pillar under combined compression-shear loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 63-73.
[3] QIN Ai-fang, HU Hong-liang. Swelling characteristics of Gaomiaozi Ca-bentonite saturated in alkaline solution and prediction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 123-131.
[4] ZHENG Fang, SHAO Sheng-jun, SHE Fang-tao, YUAN Hao, . True triaxial shear tests of remolded loess under different matrix suctions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 156-162.
[5] XU Yan, ZHOU Xiao-min, HE Xiao-nan, WU Tao, ZHANG Jian-ling, LI Sen. Thermal-solid coupling analysis of shaft wall and surrounding rocks in a mine shaft [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 217-226.
[6] LIU Quan-sheng, WANG Dong, ZHU Yuan-guang, YANG Zhan-biao, BO Yin. Application of support vector regression algorithm in inversion of geostress field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328.
[7] LI Li-hua, YU Xiao-ting, XIAO Heng-lin, MA Qiang, LIU Yi-ming, YANG Xing, . Mechanical properties of reinforcement about rice husk ash mixed soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[8] ZHU Jian-feng, XU Ri-qing, LUO Zhan-you, PAN Bin-jie, RAO Chun-yi, . A nonlinear constitutive model for soft clay stabilized by magnesia cement considering the effect of solidified agent content [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[9] CHEN Hao, HU Xiao-rong. Triple-shear failure criteria and experimental verification for unsaturated soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2380-2388.
[10] TONG Xing, YUAN Jing, JIANG Ye-xiang, LIU Xing-wang, LI Ying, . Calculation of layered unloading additional stress of foundation pit based on Mindlin solution and the analysis of multiple factors influencing the rebound deformation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[11] LIU Zheng-hong, ZHANG Long, ZHENG Jian-guo, ZHANG Wei, YU Yong-tang, . Testing device and experimental study on anti-seepage ability of sliding micrometer tube [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2504-2515.
[12] HOU Gong-yu, JING Hao-yong, LIANG Jin-ping, TAN Jin-xin, ZHANG Yong-kang, YANG Xi, XIE Xin, . Experimental study on surrounding rock deformation and acoustic emission characteristics of rectangular roadway under different loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[13] ZHUANG Xin-shan, ZHAO Han-wen, WANG Jun-xiang, HUANG Yong-jie, HU Zhi . Quantitative research on morphological characteristics of hysteretic curves of remolded weak expansive soil under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[14] WANG Kang-yu, ZHUANG Yan, GENG Xue-yu, . Experimental study on critical dynamic stress of coarse-grained soil in railway subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[15] ZHU Nan, LIU Chun-yuan, ZHAO Xian-hui, WANG Wen-jing, . Micro-structure characteristics of structured clay under different stress paths in K0 consolidated drained tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!