›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 433-441.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.057

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Size effect of foundation pits and calculation method of safety factor of heave-resistant stability considering excavation width

WANG Hong-xin   

  1. Shanghai Urban Construction Municipal Engineering (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200065, China
  • Received:2016-06-08 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09

Abstract: Project practices show that the narrow foundation pits, behaving a significant size effect, have better stability and smaller deformation than wide ones; so the embedded depth of envelope structure for narrow pits can be properly reduced at same excavation depth. However, most present stability analysis method of foundation pits design did not consider the influence of the excavation width on the safety factors, which leads to conservative design for a narrow pit. In order to make slip surface come into being for narrow pits, by moving the center of the slip arc, let the slip arc through the bottom of the enclosure wall and the intersection of excavation bottom and contralateral enclosure wall. The safety factor of stability calculated based on this slip surface can consider influence of excavation width. According to this idea, foundation pits are divided into different types by different widths, corresponding to the different calculation methods of This method can be transformed to the calculation method in the existing norms at wide pit, which can ensure the its unity with the existing specifications; for narrow pit, . The analysis shows that ignoring the size effect in the excavation design and one-sided emphasis on the insertion ratio is unscientific. Because applying traditional slip surface form of safety factor of heave-resistant stability and no excessive change on the calculation method; the calculation method are suitable for use in the design and construction of foundation pits. This calculation method of provides a theoretical basis for the narrow pit to reduce insertion depth.

Key words: foundation pit, heave-resistant stability, size effect, excavation width, embedded depth

CLC Number: 

  • TU 473.2

[1] XU Ri-qing, CHENG Kang, YING Hong-wei, LIN Cun-gang, LIANG Rong-zhu, FENG Su-yang, . Deformation response of a tunnel under foundation pit unloading considering buried depth and shearing effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 195-207.
[2] GUO Jian, CHEN Jian, HU Yang. Time series prediction for deformation of the metro foundation pit based on wavelet intelligence model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 299-304.
[3] LUO Zhao-gang, WANG Shi-ji, YANG Zhen-bei, . Quantitative analysis of fracture evolution of expansive soils under wetting-drying cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[4] TONG Xing, YUAN Jing, JIANG Ye-xiang, LIU Xing-wang, LI Ying, . Calculation of layered unloading additional stress of foundation pit based on Mindlin solution and the analysis of multiple factors influencing the rebound deformation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[5] HONG Chen-jie, HUANG Man, XIA Cai-chu, LUO Zhan-you, DU Shi-gui, . Study of size effect on the anisotropic variation coefficient of rock joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[6] WANG Cheng-tan, WANG Hao, QIN Wei-min, ZHONG Guo-qiang, CHEN Wu, . Evaluation of collapse possibility of deep foundation pits in metro stations based on multi-state fuzzy Bayesian networks [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1670-1679.
[7] WANG Hong-xin, SHEN Xu-kai, . Heave-resistant stability analysis method of foundation pit considering support [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1680-1689.
[8] YANG Xue-xiang, JIAO Yuan-fa, YANG Yu-yi, . Development and test of aerated inflation controlled anchors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[9] WANG Guo-hui, CHEN Wen-hua, NIE Qing-ke, CHEN Jun-hong, FAN Hui-hong, ZHANG Chuan, . Impacts of pit excavation on foundation piles in deep silty soil by centrifugal model tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[10] YAN Chao-ping, LONG Zhi-lin, ZHOU Yi-chun, KUANG Du-min, CHEN Jia-min, . Investigation on the effects of confining pressure and particle size of shear characteristics of calcareous sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 581-591.
[11] WEI Gang, ZHANG Xin-hai, LIN Xin-bei, HUA Xin-xin, . Variations of transverse forces on nearby shield tunnel caused by foundation pits excavation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[12] GUO Yuan-cheng, LI Ming-yu, ZHANG Yan-wei, . Incremental analytical method for prestressed anchor and soil nail wall composite support system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[13] DING Zhi, ZHANG Xiao, JIN Jie-ke, WANG Li-zhong, . Measurement analysis on whole excavation of foundation pit and deformation of adjacent metro tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 415-423.
[14] ZHOU Meng-jia, WEN Yan-feng, DENG Gang, WANG Yun-jia, SONG Er-xiang, . Three-dimensional discrete element simulation of random breaking strength and size effect in single particle splitting test of rockfill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 503-510.
[15] SHEN Hong, LI Xiao, LEI Mei-qing, XU Wen-bo, YU Xiu-ling, . Conception and model test of shear bond supporting system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2574-2580.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!