›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 1289-1297.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.05.008

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A new theory and application progress of the modified hydraulic test on pre-existing fracture to determine in-situ stresses

WANG Cheng-hu1, 2, XING Bo-rui3   

  1. 1. Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, 100085, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, 100085, China; 3. Guangdong Provincial Institute of Geological Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
  • Received:2016-07-07 Online:2017-05-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41274100), and the Fundamental Research Funds for State Level Scientific Institutes (ZDJ2012-20).

Abstract: Since many pre-existing fractures (i.e. more than 15) are required by the hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF) method, the application of HTPF method to various stress measurement conditions is restricted. To overcome the shortcomings, a mechanical equation is developed to describe the shearing stresses intrinsically occurring on geological discontinuity planes. The least square method and the trial searching algorithm code are used to calculate the frictional coefficient of pre-existing fractures and further to calculate in-situ stress tensors by the inversion technique. Theoretically, the hydraulic test on each pre-existing fracture is utilized to establish two mechanical equations, and three tests on pre-existing fractures is used to determine the in-situ stress tensor. Practically, to guarantee the convergence of the inversion code, at least five pre-existing fractures are required. Thus, the developed method is called the modified-HTPF method, which is further applied to measure in-situ stress in Weifang area, Shandong Province. During the process of stress measurement, the complete in-situ stress tensor is determined by the shut-in pressures from the hydraulic fracturing test on pre-existing fractures and the azimuth and dip angle data from Televiewer logging of five geological fractures. The in-situ stress tensors are characterized as 8.85 MPa, N58.12°W∠14.18°; 6.61 MPa, N26.2°E∠ 21.54°; and 5.01 MPa, N62.86°E∠63.86°. Compared with the data by the classic hydraulic fracturing (HF) method, the medium and minimum principal stresses determined by these two methods are similar, but there exists a large difference between the maximum principal stresses. The orientations of the maximum and minimum principal stresses determined by the modified-HTPF method are in good agreement with the classic HF method. The modified-HTPF method offers a new access to determine a complete stress tensor using a single borehole.

Key words: hydraulic fracturing, modified-HTPF, in-situ stress measurement, field operation, shut-in pressure

CLC Number: 

  • TU 473.1

[1] SHAO Chang-yue, PAN Peng-zhi, ZHAO De-cai, YAO Tian-bo, MIAO Shu-ting, YU Pei-yang, . Effect of pumping rate on hydraulic fracturing breakdown pressure and pressurization rate [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2411-2421.
[2] LOU Ye, ZHANG Guang-qing. Experimental analysis of fracturing fluid viscosity on cyclic hydraulic fracturing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 109-118.
[3] WANG Chuan-ying, WANG Yi-teng, HAN Zeng-qiang, WANG Jin-chao, ZOU Xian-jian, HU Sheng, . An in-situ stress measurement method based on borehole shape analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[4] WU Jin-wen, FENG Zi-jun, LIANG Dong, BAO Xian-kai, . Characteristics of granite failure by injecting high-temperature-vapour under uniaxial stress [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2637-2644.
[5] ZHANG Fan, MA Geng, FENG Dan, . Hydraulic fracturing simulation test and fracture propagation analysis of large-scale coal rock under true triaxial conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1890-1897.
[6] ZHANG Wei, QU Zhan-qing, GUO Tian-kui, SUN Jiang. Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing in hot dry rocks under the influence of thermal stress [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 2001-2008.
[7] ZHANG Bo, LI Yao, YANG Xue-ying, ZHU Piao-yang, ZHU Chun-di, LIU Zi-hao, LIU Wen-jie, LUO Zhi-heng, . Design and application of a hydraulic pressure supply device for hydraulic fracturing experiments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 2022-2028.
[8] XU Chen-yu, BAI Bing, LIU Ming-ze, . Experimental study of the fracture characteristics of granite under CO2 injection condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1474-1482.
[9] WANG Pu, WANG Chen-hu, YANG Ru-hua, HOU Zhen-yang, WANG Hong, . Preliminary investigation on the deep rock stresses prediction method based on stress polygon and focal mechanism solution [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4486-4496.
[10] LI Dong, LU Yi-yu, RONG Yao, ZHOU Dong-ping, GUO Chen-ye, ZHANG Shang-bin, ZHANG Cheng-ke, . Rapid uncovering seam technologies for large cross-section gas tunnel excavated through coal seams using directional hydraulic fracturing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 363-369.
[11] LIANG Tian-cheng, LIU Yun-zhi, FU Hai-feng, YAN Yu-zhong, XIU Nai-ling, WANG Zhen. Experimental study of hydraulic fracturing simulation for multistage circulating pump injection [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 355-361.
[12] LI Dong-qi, LI Zong-li, Lü Cong-cong. Analysis of fracture strength of rock mass considering fissure additional water pressure [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3174-3180.
[13] CHENG Wan, JIANG Guo-sheng, ZHOU Zhi-dong, WEI Zi-jun, ZHANG Yu, WANG Bing-hong, ZHAO Lin, . Fracture competition of simultaneous propagation of multiple hydraulic fractures in a horizontal well [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4448-4456.
[14] JIANG Ting-ting, ZHANG Jian-hua, HUANG Gang, . Experimental study of fracture geometry during hydraulic fracturing in coal [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3677-3684.
[15] ZHONG Shan, JIANG Quan, FENG Xia-ting, LIU Ji-guang, . A case of in-situ stress measurement in Chinese Jinping underground laboratory [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 356-366.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!