›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1716-1724.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.06.021

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of scarp topography on seismic ground motion under inclined P waves

DING Hai-ping1, 2, YU Yan-yan1, ZHENG Zhi-fa1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Structure Engineering of Jiangsu Province, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215011, China; 2. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China
  • Received:2015-10-16 Online:2017-06-12 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51278323) and the Major Research Plan Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (91215301).

Abstract: In this study, the seismic ground motion of the scarp topography under inclined P waves was analyzed using numerical simulation method. The effects of the incident degree, the slope angle, and the incident direction of seismic ground motion were discussed as well. It is found that from the bottom of scarp to the top, the amplification factor increased gradually, whereas it had no influence on the incident degree, the slope angle and the incident direction. When the incident degree was constant, the amplification factor of the scarp upside region was greater than that of the scarp downside region, regardless of the incident directions. At the same time, the amplification factor at the crest of the slope increased with the increase of the slope angle. When the slope angle was constant and the waves travelled away from the slope, the amplification factor of x component increased, while the amplification factor of z component decreased with the increase of incident angle. The results show that for waves travelling into the slope, the maximum amplification factor is generally found around the crest of the slope. For waves travelling away from the slope, the maximum amplification factor shifted from the slope crest. Moreover, the larger the slope angle, the farther the departure. The amplification factor of x component was larger for waves travelling away from the slope as compared to waves travelling into the slope, but the amplification factor of z component had no obvious change with the incident direction.

Key words: scarp topography, inclined P wave, ground motion, amplification factor

CLC Number: 

  • P 315.9

[1] PAN Dan-guang, CHENG Ye, CHEN Qing-jun. Shaking table test of the effect of underground shopping mall structure on ground motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[2] LI Ping, ZHANG Yu-dong, BO Tao, GU Jun-ru, ZHU Sheng. Study of ground motion effect of trapezoidal valley site based on centrifuge shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[3] XIA Kun, DONG Lin, PU Xiao-wu, LI Lu. Earthquake response characteristics of loess tableland [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[4] HE Ying, YU Qin, LIU Zhong-xian, . Simulation of multi-point spatially correlated earthquake ground motions of sedimentary valleys considering scattering effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2739-2747.
[5] XIONG Zhong-ming, ZHANG Chao, CHEN Xuan. Model test on ground motion parameters of site with fissures under seismic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 421-428.
[6] XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, GAO Liu-cheng, CHEN Su, DU Xiu-li, . Shaking table test on effects of ground motion duration compression ratio on seismic response of liquefied foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 147-155.
[7] WANG Wen-pei, LI Bin, FENG Zhen, ZHANG Bo-wen, GAO Yang, . Failure mechanism of a high-steep rock slope considering site effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 297-304.
[8] ZHU Jiao, XU Han-gang, CHEN Guo-xing, . Comparison of 1D equivalent-linear and nonlinear seismic site responses for quaternary deep sediment layers in Suzhou region [J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1479-1490.
[9] HAN Jun-yan, DU Xiu-li, HOU Ben-wei, LI Li-yun, ZHONG Zi-lan, ZHAO Mi (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing , China. A simplified analysis model for pipe-soil structural seismic responses under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4651-4658.
[10] ZHOU Yan-guo, TAN Xiao-ming, LIANG Tian, HUANG Bo, LING Dao-sheng, CHEN Yun-min,. Evaluation of soil liquefaction by ground motion intensity index by centrifuge model test [J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1869-1877.
[11] LI Xiao-jun, WANG Xiao-hui, LI Liang, HAN Jie,. Design and performance test of 3D laminar shear container for shaking table [J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1524-1532.
[12] HUANG Xiao-fu, ZHANG Ying-bin, ZHAO Xing-quan, YU Peng-cheng, XING Hao, ZHANG Jue, CHEN Yan-yan,. A preliminary study of kinetic characteristic of rock-fall under seismic loading [J]. , 2017, 38(2): 583-592.
[13] WANG Xin, CAI Ming, . Coupled numerical analysis of ground motion near excavation boundaries in underground mines [J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3347-3354.
[14] CHEN Guo-xing ,JIN Dan-dan ,ZHU Jiao ,LI Xiao-jun , . Nonlinear seismic response of estuarine basin and design parameters of ground motion [J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1721-1736.
[15] SUN Rui, ZHAO Qian-yu, YUAN Xiao-ming. Comparison between acceleration response spectra on liquefaction and non-liquefaction sites [J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 299-305.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!