›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 1009-1019.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0926

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Method of sliding distance calculation for translational landslides

TANG Ran1, 2, XU Qiang1, WU Bing3, FAN Xuan-mei1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (SKLGP), Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China; 2. Sichuan Institute of Geology Engineering Investigation, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China; 3. Shenzhen Water Planning and Design Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, China
  • Received:2017-05-01 Online:2018-03-12 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41521002) and the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41630640).

Abstract: Translational landslides are widely spread in red layers area in Sichuan Basin. This type of landslide develops in sub-horizontal bedrock composed of sandstone and mudstone, normally with the dip angle of 3 to 5 degrees, 10 degrees at most. Based on geo-mechanical model and sliding process analysis, with the application of the principle of energy conservation, we derived the theoretical sliding distance calculation formula of translational landslide. Three groups of physical simulation tests were established. Group test Ⅰ simulated the sliding distance under the water pressure generated under different conditions of widths and different water heads. Then the theoretical formula was tested by comparing the calculated results and group Ⅰ physical simulation test results. By comparison, the overall distribution shape of uplift pressure under the bottom of sliding body was close to rectangle with very few groundwater penetration points along the shear outlet. To verify the theoretical formula, group tests Ⅱ and Ⅲ were established thereafter. Each group of tests fixed the width and water head respectively. Meanwhile the shear outlet of physical model was set to two types totally blocked and totally seeping water. The results of three groups of physical simulation tests verified the reliability and applicability of theoretical formula. Applying the theoretical formula to Shizishan landslide to calculate the sliding distance, and the calculation results showed the good applicability of the method. The research has some guidance and practical value to prevention and mitigation of translational landslides.

Key words: translational landslide, sliding distance, calculation model, physical simulation, distribution shape of uplift pressure

CLC Number: 

  • TU 457

[1] XU Yi-qing, DENG Shao-yu, GE Qi. Prediction models for short-term and long-term pre-stress loss of anchor cable [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[2] XU Jiang, SONG Xiao-zheng, PENG Shou-jian, ZHANG Chao-lin, LI Qi-xian, ZHANG Xiao-lei, . Physical simulation experiment on influence of borehole spacing along the seam on effect of gas drainage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4581-4589.
[3] ZHENG Guang, XU Qiang, PENG Shuang-qi. Calculation model of the long-runout distance of rock avalanche [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4897-4906.
[4] WANG Li-yan, GONG Wen-xue, CAO Xiao-ting, JIANG Peng-ming, WANG Bing-hui. Anti-liquefaction characteristics of gravel steel slag [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3741-3750.
[5] LI Wei, XU Qiang, WU Li-zhou, LI Si-qi, . Influence of seepage forms of confined water on translational landslide [J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1401-1410.
[6] XU Jiang, SU Xiao-peng, PENG Shou-jian, LIU Yi-xin, FENG Dan, LIU Long-rong, . Test on gas migration characteristics during coal bed methane exploitation under different lengths of drilling hole in distressed zone [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 103-111.
[7] YUE Zhe, YE Yi-cheng, WANG Qi-hu, YAO Nan, SHI Yao-bin. A model for calculation of compressive strength of rock-like materials based on dimensional analysis [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 216-221.
[8] HU Ming-jian, JIANG Hang-hai, CUI Xiang, RUAN Yang, LIU Hai-feng, ZHANG Chen-yang,. Preliminary study of conductivity and correlation problems of calcareous sand [J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 158-162.
[9] JIANG Yi, WEI Siyu, SHANG Yan-jun, GAO Qiang, LI Yan-yan,. Study of mechanical properties of deep mixed ground [J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 266-272.
[10] YI Qing-lin, ZHAO Neng-hao, LIU Yi-liang, . Model of landslide stability calculation based on energy conservation [J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 1-10.
[11] ZHANG Dong-mei, GAO Cheng-peng, YIN Zhen-yu, WANG Ru-lu, YANG Tian-liang,. Particle flow simulation of seepage erosion around shield tunnel [J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 429-438.
[12] ZHANG Chao-lin, PENG Shou-jian, XU Jiang, GENG Jia-bo, YANG Hong-wei, LUO Xiao-hang, . Temporospatial evolution of gas pressure during coal and gas outburst [J]. , 2017, 38(1): 81-90.
[13] YANG Guang-hua, HUANG Zhong-ming, JIANG Yan, XU Chuan-bao,. Improvement of calculation model of double-row piles for supporting deep excavation [J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 1-15.
[14] MA Geng, ZHANG Fan, LIU Xiao, FENG Dan, ZHANG Peng-wei,. Experimental study of impact of crustal stress on fracture pressure and hydraulic fracture [J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 216-222.
[15] LIU Bao , PHAM Duc Phong , SU Qian, GUI Bo,. Deformation characteristics of subgrade graded gravel with different water contents [J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1365-1372.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!