›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S1): 367-373.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.045

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study of II class mining technical factors influencing results of pre-assessment of rockburst risk

PAN Jun-feng,XIA Yong-xue,FENG Mei-hua,QIN Zi-han   

  1. 1. Coal Mining Branch, China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; 2. Coal Mining and Designing Department, Tiandi Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100013, China
  • Received:2016-10-23 Online:2017-06-22 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the State Key Project of Research and Development Plan(2016YFC0801401, 2016YFC0801403), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51574149), the Productivity Transformation Foundation of Tiandi Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (KJ-2015-TDKC-05), the Technology Innovation Foundation of China Coal Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd.(2016MS010), and the Key Foundation of Tiandi Science and Technology Co., Ltd.(KJ-2016-TDKC-01).

Abstract: To overcome the deficiency of current risk pre-assessment method, the II class mining technical factors are defined and pointed out to reveal how the II class mining technical factors inherently induce the abnormal vibrations of coal and rock, and trigger disasters.The results show that: the greater the rate of face advance mining, coal and rock shake more frequent and the greater probability of the high-energy shock event, To decrease in low-level microseismic events, and high-energy event frequency increased, overall microseismic activity enhancement when the workface with a uneven advance rate, The method of blasting to relief stress in coal seam aimed the burst start-up areas of the roadway's sides, So the energy released of per kg dynamite during blasting much larger than the amount of energy released of blasting in roof or ground; the 7-18 h is the most effective period of dangerous lift. The original balance of stress field were broken by the repair in roadway's sides; the wall rock from a relatively stable state becomes unstable; the greater the rate of repair in roadway's sides, and the greater probability of the high-energy shock event. A sharp rise in the various levels of microseismic events, and the risk associated with high-energy events because of the ceasing and recovery production of workface.II class mining technology factors temporary intervention, breaking the original balance state, make coal rock macro adjustment, micro fracture suddenly disorder, stimulate coal rock impact events occur.

Key words: pre-assessment of rockburst risk, II class mining technical factors, mining rates, repair in roadway's sides, rockburst

CLC Number: 

  • TU 713

[1] CHEN Bing-rui, FENG Xia-ting, FU Qi-qing, WANG Bo, ZHU Xin-hao, LI Tao, LU Cai-ping, XIA Huan, . Integration and high precision intelligence microseismic monitoring technology and its application in deep rock engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2422-2431.
[2] LI Tong, FENG Xia-ting, WANG Rui, XIAO Ya-xun, WANG Yong, FENG Guang-liang, YAO Zhi-bin, NIU Wen-jing, . Characteristics of rockburst location deflection and its microseismic activities in a deep tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.
[3] ZHOU Hui, CHEN Jun, ZHANG Chuan-qing, ZHU Yong, LU Jing-jing, JIANG Yue, . Experimental study of the rockburst model material with low-strength and high-brittleness [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2039-2049.
[4] SU Guo-shao, YAN Si-zhou, YAN Zhao-fu, ZHAI Shao-bin, YAN Liu-bin, . Evolution characteristics of acoustic emission in rockburst process under true-triaxial loading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[5] LUO Dan-ni, SU Guo-shao, HE Bao-yu, . True triaxial test on rockburst of granites with different water saturations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.
[6] YAN Jian, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, MENG Wei, . Influence of high geotemperature on rockburst occurrence in tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[7] MEI Shi-ming, HU Xiao-chuan, SU Guo-shao, CHEN Guan-yan, . Model test study of the influence of intermediate principal stress on rockburst in tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3959-3968.
[8] ZHAO Fei, WANG Hong-jian, HE Man-chao, YUAN Guang-xiang, LUO Yao-wu, . Acoustic emission characteristics of granite specimens with different heights in rockburst tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 135-146.
[9] WANG Zhi-dong, LI Li-yun, CHEN Tao, LIU Bing-quan, . Study of energy release in model tests on pillar rockburst [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 177-185.
[10] ZHU Si-tao, JIANG Fu-xing, ZHU Hai-zhou, ZHANG Jun-jie, LIAN Hong-quan, HAN Guo-qing, . Study of mechanism of rockburst accident in heading face in high stress area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 337-343.
[11] XIANG Peng, JI Hong-guang, CAI Mei-feng, ZHANG Yue-zheng. Dynamic energy release mechanism and geometric scale feature of ejection rockburst source [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 457-466.
[12] SI Xue-feng, GONG Feng-qiang, LUO Yong, LI Xi-bing, . Experimental simulation on rockburst process of deep three-dimensional circular cavern [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 621-634.
[13] MA Chun-chi, LI Tian-bin, ZHANG Hang, WANG Jian-feng,. An evaluation and early warning method for rockburst based on EMS microseismic source parameters [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 765-774.
[14] MENG Wei, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, ZHANG Jun-bo, WU Fang-yin, XIA Wu-yang. Two-stage back analysis of initial geostress field in rockburst area based on lateral pressure coefficient [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4191-4200.
[15] LIU Xin-jin, SU Guo-shao, FENG Xia-ting, YAN Liu-bin,YAN Zhao-fu, ZHANG Jie, LI Yan-fang. Dynamic prediction method of laboratory rockburst using sound signals [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3573-3580.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!