Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 4605-4616.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0400

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of the longitudinal deformation of existing shield tunnel induced by temporary surface surcharge

KANG Cheng1, MEI Guo-xiong2,3,4, LIANG Rong-zhu1,2, WU Wen-bing1,2,3,4, FANG Yu-xiang1, KE Zhai-bang5   

  1. 1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Engineering Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 4. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 5. Anhui Institute of Building Research & Design, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
  • Received:2018-03-19 Online:2018-12-11 Published:2019-01-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41807262, 51678547), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (CUG170647) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2018CFB179).

Abstract: Illegal temporary surface surcharge can induce additional ground stress, which may cause adverse effects or damage to the existing shield tunnel structure. However, current methods for predicting tunnel longitudinal responses to surface surcharge generally simplify the tunnel as an Euler-Bernoulli beam resting on Winkler foundation, which ignores the shearing deformation of shield tunnel and cannot consider effect of the burial depth on the coefficient of subgrade reaction. In this study, a new analytical method is developed to evaluate the existing shield tunnel deformation subjected to surface surcharge, considering the tunnel shearing effect and the burial depth of the tunnel. In the proposed method, the shield tunnel is treated as Timoshenko beam resting on Winkler foundation and the effect of burial depth of shield tunnel on the coefficient of subgrade reaction is considered. The effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method is verified by a three-dimensional finite element analysis and measured data from a case. Parametric analysis indicates that a shallowly buried shield tunnel suffers large settlement when the distance between the load center and tunnel axis is relatively close. Increasing the equivalent bending stiffness and the coefficient of subgrade reaction would remarkably reduce tunnel settlement. The tunnel settlement was hardly sensitive to equivalent shear stiffness. However, increasing equivalent shear stiffness would significantly reduce the dislocation between the adjacent rings. In general, the proposed method will serve to be theory support for reasonably predicting the shield tunnel responses to surface surcharge.

Key words: surface surcharge, shield tunnel, theoretic analysis, deformation of tunnel

CLC Number: 

  • TU 432
[1] MI Bo, XIANG Yan-yong, . Model experiment and calculation analysis of excavation-seepage stability for shallow shield tunneling in sandy ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[2] YANG Zhen-xing, CHEN Jian, SUN Zhen-chuan, YOU Yong-feng, ZHOU Jian-jun, LÜ Qian-qian, . Experimental study on improved seawater slurry for slurry shield [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 501-508.
[3] WEI Gang, ZHANG Xin-hai, LIN Xin-bei, HUA Xin-xin, . Variations of transverse forces on nearby shield tunnel caused by foundation pits excavation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[4] WANG Zhong-kai, XU Guang-li. Influence range and quantitative prediction of surface deformation during shield tunnelling and exiting stages [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
[5] ZHANG Ding-wen, LIU Zhi-xiang, SHEN Guo-gen, E Jun-yu, . Measurement of earth pressure of shallow buried tunnel with super large diameter and applicability evaluation of calculation method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 91-98.
[6] ZHANG Zhi-guo, LI Sheng-nan, ZHANG Cheng-ping, WANG Zhi-wei, . Analysis of stratum deformation and lining response induced by shield construction considering influences of underground water level rise and fall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[7] HUANG Da-wei, ZHOU Shun-hua, FENG Qing-song, LUO Kun, LEI Xiao-yan, XU You-jun, . Analysis for vertical earth pressure transference on overlaying soils of shield tunnel under uniform surface surcharge [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[8] MO Zhen-ze, WANG Meng-shu, LI Hai-bo, QIAN Yong-jin, LUO Gen-dong, WANG Hui, . Laboratory investigation on pore water pressure variation caused by filter cake effect during slurry-EPB shield tunneling in silty sand layer [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2257-2263.
[9] YAO Ai-jun, ZHANG Jian-tao, GUO Hai-feng, GUO Yan-fei. Influence of unloading-loading of foundation on shield tunnel underneath [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2318-2326.
[10] ZHONG Yu, CHEN Jian, CHEN Guo-liang, WU Jia-ming, . Shield tunnel structure information modelling method based on building information modeling technology [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1867-1876.
[11] YANG Wen-bo, CHEN Zi-quan, XU Zhao-yang, YAN Qi-xiang, HE Chuan, WEI Kai, . Dynamic response of shield tunnels and surrounding soil induced by train vibration [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 537-545.
[12] LI Chang-jun, CHEN Wei-zhong, YANG Jian-ping, LIU Jin-quan, . Variation of segment joint opening of underwater shield tunnel in operation period [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3783-3793.
[13] WEI Gang, LIN Xiong, JIN Rui, DING Zhi,. Security discrimination of adjacent underground pipelines during the construction of twin shield tunnels [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 181-190.
[14] JIANG Yan, YANG Guang-hua, CHEN Fu-qiang, XU Chuan-bao, ZHANG Yu-cheng, . Force determination and monitoring feedback analysis of typical sections of lining structure of cross-sea shield tunnel under high head in Zhanjiang bay [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 275-286.
[15] HUANG Xiao-kang, LU Kun-lin, ZHU Da-yong,. Simulation test study of deformations of pipelines located at different geometric positions arising from shield tunneling [J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 123-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!