Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 2748-2754.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0591

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Impact of uncertainty in in-situ shear-wave velocity on the judgement of site stiffness

CHEN Zhuo-shi, YUAN Xiao-ming, SUN Rui, WANG Ke   

  1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China
  • Received:2018-04-10 Online:2019-07-11 Published:2019-07-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2018A01), the Key Special Project of National Key R&D Plan, International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation (2016YFE0105500) and the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (QC2017037).

Abstract: Uncertainty in geotechnical engineering greatly results in engineering risk. In this study, the first large-scale uncertainty experiment on the in-situ shear-wave velocity (Vs) was carried out on 20 typical sites in 7 major regions of China. A total of 11 kinds of common engineering instruments were completed by using single hole method in 47 units, and 600 groups of Vs were obtained finally. According to this in-situ database, the corresponding formula between Coefficient of variation (COV) of time-average shear-wave velocity (Vs, z) and the calculated depth (Z) was fitted. We revealed the impact of in-situ Vs uncertainty on the judgement of site stiffness and pointed out the possible potential misjudging area of site classification in China. At the current level of in-situ Vs test in China, COV of Vs, z is negatively correlated with depth, which indicates that it reaches the max value of 15% near the site surface and then decreases significantly with the increasing of the depth. In the depth range from 0 m to 10 m, the COV of Vs, z decreases rapidly; in the depth range of 10-20 m, the COV of Vs, z decreases slowly; after the depth of 20 m, the COV of Vs, z is less than 5% and basically unchanged; the COV of equivalent shear wave velocity (Vse) used for site classification of Class III and IV sites in China is basically the same as that of the field classification index Vs, 30 used in Europe and America. Based on China building code GB50011-2010, Class I and Class II sites with the soil thickness less than 5 m or Vse close to 500 m/s should consider the potential impact of Vs uncertainty, while other types of Class II and Class III and Class IV sites could ignore the uncertainty.

Key words: shear-wave velocity, uncertainty, site stiffness, Time-average Shear-wave Velocity

CLC Number: 

  • P 642
[1] TIAN Mi, SHENG Xiao-tao, . Method for determining minimum test data quantity for geotechnical engineering investigation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 400-408.
[2] LI Shu-cai, HE Peng, LI Li-ping, ZHANG Qian-qing, SHI Shao-shuai, XU Fei, LIU Hong-liang. Reliability analysis method of sub-classification of tunnel rock mass and its engineering application [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 967-376.
[3] ZHANG Biao, DAI Xing-guo. A cloud model for predicting rockburst intensity grade based on index distance and uncertainty measure [J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 257-265.
[4] QI Xiao-hui, LI Dian-qing, CAO Zi-jun, TANG Xiao-song, . Uncertainty analysis of slope stability considering geological uncertainty [J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1385-1396.
[5] FANG Yan-bing, SU Yong-hua, XIAO Wang, LIANG Bin. Non-probabilistic reliability model for implicit performance function based on subinterval method [J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1171-1178.
[6] BI Jun, CHEN Wen-wu, . Influence of forms of parameter m and largest matric suction point on the parameters of Van Genuchten model [J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3604-3612.
[7] ZHANG Feng, ZHOU Feng, WANG Xu-dong,. Robust geotechnical design of a single pile under vertical loads in layered soils [J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3311-3318.
[8] XIN Jun-xia, WU Xing-zheng, GAO Wei, REN Guo-jia, MA Jun-xiang, FAN Lei, . Copula-based analysis of load-displacement curves of cement-fly ash-gravel pile [J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 424-434.
[9] TANG Xiao-song , LI Dian-qing , CAO Zi-jun , ZHOU Chuang-bing , PHOON Kok-kwang , . A Bootstrap method for analyzing slope reliability based on limited shear-strength parameter data [J]. , 2016, 37(3): 893-901.
[10] WU Xing-zheng , JIANG Liang-wei , LUO Qiang , KONG De-hui , ZHANG Liang , . Analysis of model uncertainty for stability reliability of embankment slope [J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 665-672.
[11] XIE Xin-yu , FENG Xiang , WU Xiao-ming,. Reliability analysis of progressive failure of strain softening slope [J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 679-684.
[12] LIU Fang , LI Zhen , JIANG Ming-jing , HUANG Yu , . Exceedance probability of liquefaction-induced lateral displacement considering seismic randomness [J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3548-3555.
[13] SHAN Bo, CHEN Jian-ping, WANG Qing. Debris flow susceptibility analysis based on theories of minimum entropy and uncertainty measurement [J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1445-1454.
[14] LI Xiao-jun ,ZHANG Zhen-yuan,. A combined indicator-ordinary Kriging method for estimating thicknesses of discontinuous geological strata [J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2881-2887.
[15] TANG Ren-hua, CHEN Chang-fu. Analysis and calculation method of reliability of anchored retaining wall [J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1389-1394.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!