Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 2713-2722.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0601

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Solution and analysis of dynamic response for rigid buried pipe in multi-layered soil based on SBFEM

ZHANG Hai-ting1, YANG Lin-qing2, GUO Fang3   

  1. 1. Henan Vocational College of Water Conservancy and Environment, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China; 2. School of Architectural Engineering, Tianhe College of Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510540, China; 3. Henan Vocational College of Agriculture, Zhongmou, Henan 451450, China
  • Received:2018-04-13 Online:2019-07-11 Published:2019-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508203) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018MS61).

Abstract: In this paper, an improved scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) is used to solve the dynamic response of rigid buried pipe in multi-layered soil combined with finite element method. A new coordinate transformation relation is introduced into the improved SBFEM, with a similar line instead of the similar center in traditional SBFEM. Then the dynamic stiffness matrix equation can be obtained by using weighted residual method for multi-layered soil. Finally, the dynamic stiffness matrix is coupled with finite element method at the boundary between the near field and far field to solve the dynamic response for rigid buried pipe in multi-layered soil. The comparison with an existing solution validates the accuracy of the proposed method. And the influence of heterogeneity characteristic of layered soil, Poisson’s ratio and buried depth on the dynamic response of the buried pipe is further investigated through a parametric analysis which provides the necessary numerical basis for the engineering practice. As the results show, the heterogeneity characteristic of layered soil and Poisson’s ratio have significant influence on the dynamic response of the buried pipeline. With the increase of the buried depth, the dynamic response of the pipeline under the same load decreases.

Key words: scaled boundary finite element method, multi-layered soil, weighted residual method, dynamic stiffness, buried pipe

CLC Number: 

  • TU 81
[1] ZHOU En-quan, ZONG Zhi-xin, WANG Qiong, LU Jian-fei, ZUO Xi. Dynamic characteristics of pipe buried in rubber-silt lightweight mixtures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
[2] HAN Jun-yan, HOU Ben-wei, ZHONG Zi-lan, ZHAO Mi, LI Li-yun, DU Xiu-li. Research on shaking table test scheme of buried pipeline under multi-point non-uniform seismic excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2127-2139.
[3] CHEN Chang-fu, ZENG Song-lin, LIU Yi-jun. Calculation of the internal forces of pile-anchor cable structure considering the prestressed loss based on weighted residual method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4569-4576.
[4] HAN Jun-yan, DU Xiu-li, HOU Ben-wei, LI Li-yun, ZHONG Zi-lan, ZHAO Mi (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing , China. A simplified analysis model for pipe-soil structural seismic responses under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4651-4658.
[5] ZOU De-gao, LIU Suo, CHEN Kai, KONG Xian-jing, YU Xiang,. Static and dynamic analysis of seismic response nonlinearity for geotechnical engineering using quadtree mesh and polygon scaled boundary finite element method [J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 33-40.
[6] LUO Tao, E. T. Ooi, A. H. C Chan, FU Shao-jun,. A combined DEM-SBFEM for modelling particle breakage of rock-fill materials [J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1463-1471.
[7] LIU Jian-lei , MA Meng , LI Lin-jie , KE Zai-tian , GAO Yan,. Study of bearing capacity evaluation for bridge piles by measured dynamic stiffness [J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 571-576.
[8] WANG Jian-hua , YANG Zhao-huan , . Model tests on interaction between pipeline and soft clay under axial loading [J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 61-65.
[9] MA Meng ,LIU Jian-lei ,SUN Ning ,KE Zai-tian ,LI Lin-jie,. Analysis of factors influencing dynamic stiffness of pile foundations [J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1939-1944.
[10] GONG Xiao-nan , SUN Zhong-ju , YU Jian-lin , . Analysis of displacement of adjacent buried pipeline caused by ground surcharge [J]. , 2015, 36(2): 305-310.
[11] LIU Xiao-qiang ,LIANG Fa-yun ,ZHANG Hao ,CHU Feng,. Energy variational solution for settlement of buried pipeline induced by tunneling [J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 217-222.
[12] LIN Zhi-yong , DAI Zi-hang , . Interaction coefficients method for calculating piles group settlements considering reinforcing and restraining effect [J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 221-226.
[13] CHEN Deng-hong ,DU Cheng-bin,. A computational model for structure-foundation dynamic interaction in time domain [J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1164-1172.
[14] ZHENG Chang-jie ,DING Xuan-ming ,LIU Han-long ,Lü Ya-ru . Analytic method of torsional vibration response of cast-in-place concrete large-diameter pipe pile in viscoelastic soil [J]. , 2013, 34(7): 1943-1950.
[15] QIN Shi-wei , MO Long , SHI Hui-zhi . Characteristics of horizontal vibration of end-bearing piles in liquefied soils under axial force [J]. , 2013, 34(4): 987-995.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!