Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 4838-4847.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1913

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of determination methods of site Rayleigh damping coefficients in seismic responses analysis of underground structures

XU Zi-gang, DU Xiu-li, XU Cheng-shun, ZHANG Chi-yu, JIANG Jia-wei   

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2018-10-16 Online:2019-12-11 Published:2020-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFC1504305), the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51421005) and the Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China (IRT13044).

Abstract: The accuracy of the structural seismic responses largely depends on the calculation of the Rayleigh damping coefficients in the dynamic time and history analysis. By analyzing the seismic responses of a stratified site under different earthquake actions, the results in time domain and frequency domain based on commonly used damping coefficients are compared with each other. A new method for calculating Rayleigh damping coefficients for time domain analysis with hysteretic damping ratio is proposed. The influence of different calculation methods of Rayleigh damping coefficient on the seismic responses of a single-story two-span underground subway station is discussed based on the proposed method. The results show that the average error of the seismic responses of the site is minimum between the new method and the frequency domain method. The results of the modified full Rayleigh damping agree well with the new method for the seismic responses of the underground structure. The calculation method for Rayleigh damping coefficients proposed in this paper has the advantage of high precision and simple operation, can be widely used in seismic response analyses of site and underground structures.

Key words: Rayleigh damping, underground structure, frequency domain, time domain, seismic response

CLC Number: 

  • TU435
[1] YU Hai-tao, ZHANG Zheng-wei, LI Pan, . Improved equivalent response acceleration method for seismic design of underground structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2401-2410.
[2] HAN Jun-yan, LI Man-jun, ZHONG Zi-lan, XU Jing-shu, LI Li-yun, LAN Jing-yan, DU Xiu-li. Seismic response of soil under non-uniform excitation based on shaking table test of buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[3] PAN Dan-guang, CHENG Ye, CHEN Qing-jun. Shaking table test of the effect of underground shopping mall structure on ground motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[4] WANG Chong, HU Da-wei, REN Jin-ming, ZHOU Hui, LU Jing-jing, LIU Chuan-xin, . Influence of erosive environment on permeability and mechanical properties of underground structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3457-3464.
[5] XU Zi-gang, DU Xiu-li, XU Cheng-shun, HAN Run-bo, QIAO Lei. Research on generalized response displacement method for seismic analysis of underground structures with complex sections [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3247-3254.
[6] HAN Jun-yan, ZHONG Zi-lan, LI Li-yun, ZHAO Mi, WAN Ning-tan, DU Xiu-li. Nonlinear seismic response of free-field soil under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2581-2592.
[7] LU Jun-long, ZHANG Yin, . Experimental study of the seismic response of the assembled multi-ribbed wall structure-subsoil system in frequency domain [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2163-2171.
[8] ZOU You-xue, WANG Rui, ZHANG Jian-mi, . Analysis on the seismic response of stone columns composite foundation in liquefiable soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[9] ZHUANG Hai-yang, FU Ji-sai, CHEN Su, CHEN Guo-xing, WANG Xue-jian, . Liquefaction and deformation of the soil foundation around a subway underground structure with a slight inclined ground surface by the shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[10] SUN Guang-chen, XIE Jia-you, HE Shan, FU He-lin, JIANG Xue-liang, ZHENG Liang, . Dynamic responses of bridge-tunnel approaching parts under different seismic excitation directions in soft surrounding rock [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 893-902.
[11] LI Cheng-wu, FU Shuai, XIE Bei-jing, LI Guang-yao, WAN Tian-yu. Characteristics and generation mechanism of low-frequency magnetic field generated during the damage of coal under static load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 481-488.
[12] XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, DU Xiu-li, CHEN Su, HAN Jun-yan, . Large-scale shaking table model test of liquefiable free field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3767-3777.
[13] LIU Zhong-xian, ZHANG Zheng, WANG Shao-jie, LIANG Jian-wen, WANG Hai-liang, . 3D seismic response broadband-simulation of the alluvial basin in urban region based on the FMM-IBEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 4101-4110.
[14] XU Ming, TANG Ya-feng, LIU Xian-shan, LUO Bin, TANG Dao-yong,. Seismic dynamic response of rock slope anchored with adaptive anchor cables [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[15] HAN Bing, LIANG Jian-wen, ZHU Jun,. Effect of lenticle on seismic response of structures in deep water-saturated poroelastic soft site [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2227-2236.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!