Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2443-2455.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0852

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis on the seismic response of stone columns composite foundation in liquefiable soils

ZOU You-xue1, 2, 3, WANG Rui1, 2, 3, ZHANG Jian-min1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. National Engineering Laboratory for Urban Rail Transit Green and Safety Construction Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2017-05-02 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678346, 51708332).

Abstract: With the application of a plasticity model for large post-liquefaction deformation of sand to model the liquefiable soil and an equivalent nonlinear incremental model to model stone columns (SC), three-dimensional dynamic responses of stone columns composite foundation in liquefiable soil are numerically investigated using finite difference code FLAC3D. The analysis investigates the effect of the SC’s high stiffness and improved drainage on soil liquefaction mitigation, the excess pore water pressure (EPWP) build-up and dissipation, the deformation process of the liquefiable soil from small to large deformation in the pre- and post-liquefaction regimes, and the variation of stress distribution between SC and surrounding soils. The results show that the model and the program can reasonably reproduce the seismic response of stone columns composite foundation in liquefiable soils and its effect of liquefaction mitigation. The vertical stress and horizontal shear stress gradually concentrate to SC during earthquake shaking and vertical effective stress ratio may decrease to 1/6-1/3, the deformation in soil and SC is incompatible and the ratio of shear strain in the soil and SC may reach 7-10. A ratio of SC permeability to soil permeability larger than 100 significantly decreases the EPWP, while the stiffness of SC slightly decreases EPWP but helps reduce the surface peak acceleration.

Key words: seismic response, liquefiable foundation, stone columns, liquefaction mitigation, FLAC3D

CLC Number: 

  • TU 435
[1] HAN Jun-yan, LI Man-jun, ZHONG Zi-lan, XU Jing-shu, LI Li-yun, LAN Jing-yan, DU Xiu-li. Seismic response of soil under non-uniform excitation based on shaking table test of buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[2] PAN Dan-guang, CHENG Ye, CHEN Qing-jun. Shaking table test of the effect of underground shopping mall structure on ground motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[3] YANG Wen-bo, ZOU Tao, TU Jiu-lin, GU Xiao-xu, LIU Yu-chen, YAN Qi-xiang, HE Chuan. Analysis of dynamic response of horseshoe cross-section tunnel under vibrating load induced by high-speed train [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[4] HAN Jun-yan, ZHONG Zi-lan, LI Li-yun, ZHAO Mi, WAN Ning-tan, DU Xiu-li. Nonlinear seismic response of free-field soil under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2581-2592.
[5] MU Rui, PU Shao-yun, HUANG Zhi-hong, LI Yong-hui, ZHENG Pei-xin, LIU Yang, LIU Ze, ZHENG Hong-chao, . Determination of ultimate bearing capacity of uplift piles in combined soil and rock masses [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[6] SUN Guang-chen, XIE Jia-you, HE Shan, FU He-lin, JIANG Xue-liang, ZHENG Liang, . Dynamic responses of bridge-tunnel approaching parts under different seismic excitation directions in soft surrounding rock [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 893-902.
[7] XU Zi-gang, DU Xiu-li, XU Cheng-shun, ZHANG Chi-yu, JIANG Jia-wei. Comparison of determination methods of site Rayleigh damping coefficients in seismic responses analysis of underground structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4838-4847.
[8] XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, DU Xiu-li, CHEN Su, HAN Jun-yan, . Large-scale shaking table model test of liquefiable free field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3767-3777.
[9] LIU Zhong-xian, ZHANG Zheng, WANG Shao-jie, LIANG Jian-wen, WANG Hai-liang, . 3D seismic response broadband-simulation of the alluvial basin in urban region based on the FMM-IBEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 4101-4110.
[10] YANG Xiu-rong, JIANG An-nan, JIANG Zong-bin. Creep test and damage model of soft rock under water containing condition [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 167-174.
[11] LIU Jian, ZHAO Guo-yan, LIANG Wei-zhang, WU Hao, PENG FU-hua,. Numerical simulation of uniaxial compressive strength and failure characteristics in nonuniform rock materials [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 505-512.
[12] XU Ming, TANG Ya-feng, LIU Xian-shan, LUO Bin, TANG Dao-yong,. Seismic dynamic response of rock slope anchored with adaptive anchor cables [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[13] HAN Bing, LIANG Jian-wen, ZHU Jun,. Effect of lenticle on seismic response of structures in deep water-saturated poroelastic soft site [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2227-2236.
[14] YAO Yu, WANG Rui, LIU Tian-yun, ZHANG Jian-min,. Seismic response of high concrete face rockfill dams subject to non-uniform input motion [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2259-2266.
[15] LIU Fei-yue, YANG Tian-hong, ZHANG Peng-hai1, ZHOU Jing-ren, DENG Wen-xue, HOU Xian-gang, ZHAO Yong-chuan, . Dynamic inversion of rock fracturing stress field based on acoustic emission [J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1517-1524.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!