Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 3635-3644.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2286

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of dynamic response of horseshoe cross-section tunnel under vibrating load induced by high-speed train

YANG Wen-bo, ZOU Tao, TU Jiu-lin, GU Xiao-xu, LIU Yu-chen, YAN Qi-xiang, HE Chuan   

  1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2018-12-19 Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China(2016YFC0802201) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51678499).

Abstract: In this paper, both physical tests and numerical simulation were conducted to study the dynamic response characteristics of the tunnels with horseshoe cross-section under high-speed train loads. Based on time domain and frequency domain analysis, the frequency response function (FRF) and peak particle acceleration (PPA) are used as evaluation indicators. Under the train vibration loads, the dynamic response of tunnels is analyzed at the speeds of 300 km/h and 350 km/h in the physical tests, respectively. The numerical model is developed by FLAC3D to study the dynamic response of the tunnel under moving loads of high-speed train. Results show that the dynamic response of the tunnel is not attenuated in the circumferential direction as the distance from the vibration source increases. The tunnel response shows a clear attenuation from the inverted arch to the arch. However, there is an increasing trend from the arch to the vault. The test results also show that dynamic response of the horseshoe cross-section tunnel is greater than dynamic response of the circular tunnel, and the average difference is about 3.8 dB in frequency range of 40?200 Hz. It indicates that the tunnel cross-section greatly affects the dynamic response of the tunnel, which should be considered in design. Furthermore, the PPA of the tunnel is the largest at the inverted arch under single-point excitation load. The peak acceleration is the smallest at the tunnel dome. The PPA of the tunnel at monitoring points shows obvious periodic effect under moving train loads of high-speed train. The PPA reaches the highest value when the train travels at the monitoring section. The PPA of the tunnel under moving train loads shows a clear amplification compared with tunnel response under the single-point excitation load. Therefore, it is important to consider the effect of moving trains when studying the tunnel dynamic behaviour under train induced vibration loads.

Key words: horseshoe cross-section tunnel, high-speed train, vibration load, physical test, FLAC3D, dynamic response

CLC Number: 

  • TU435
[1] QIAO Xiang-jin, LIANG Qing-guo, CAO Xiao-ping, WANG Li-li, . Research on dynamic responses of the portal in bridge-tunnel connected system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[2] HE Jing-bin, FENG Zhong-ju, DONG Yun-xiu, HU Hai-bo, LIU Chuang, GUO Sui-zhu, ZHANG Cong, WU Min, WANG Zhen, . Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[3] REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, LAI Lin. Centrifugal shaking table test on dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope in strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[4] WANG Li-an, ZHAO Jian-chang, HOU Xiao-qiang, LIU Sheng-wei, WANG Zuo-wei. Lamb problem for non-homogeneous saturated half-space [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[5] FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, WANG Cheng-long, CHEN Zhi-xiong. Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[6] LU Wei, ZHAO Dong, LI Dong-bo, MAO Xiao-fei. Analytical method for dynamic response of fully grouted anchorage system of rammed earth sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[7] LIU Jian-min, QIU Yue, GUO Ting-ting, SONG Wen-zhi, GU Chuan, . Comparative experimental study on static shear strength and postcyclic strength of saturated silty clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[8] ZHANG Heng-yuan, QIAN De-ling, SHEN Chao, DAI Qi-quan. Experimental investigation on dynamic response of pile group foundation on liquefiable ground subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[9] WU Qi, DING Xuan-ming, CHEN Zhi-xiong, CHEN Yu-min, PENG Yu, . Seismic response of pile-soil-structure in coral sand under different earthquake intensities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[10] XIA Kun, DONG Lin, PU Xiao-wu, LI Lu. Earthquake response characteristics of loess tableland [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[11] YU Yi-fan, WANG Ping, WANG Hui-juan, XU Shu-ya, GUO Hai-tao, . Physical model test of seismic dynamic response to accumulative landslide [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[12] MU Rui, PU Shao-yun, HUANG Zhi-hong, LI Yong-hui, ZHENG Pei-xin, LIU Yang, LIU Ze, ZHENG Hong-chao, . Determination of ultimate bearing capacity of uplift piles in combined soil and rock masses [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[13] LU Jun-long, ZHANG Yin, . Experimental study of the seismic response of the assembled multi-ribbed wall structure-subsoil system in frequency domain [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2163-2171.
[14] JIANG Li-Chun, LUO En-Min, SHEN Bin-Bin, . A dynamic response of blasting to stereoscopic goaf group based on the multi-degree of freedom model method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2407-2415.
[15] ZOU You-xue, WANG Rui, ZHANG Jian-mi, . Analysis on the seismic response of stone columns composite foundation in liquefiable soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!