Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2389-2400.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2122

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area

HE Jing-bin1, FENG Zhong-ju1, DONG Yun-xiu1, 2, HU Hai-bo1, LIU Chuang3, GUO Sui-zhu1, ZHANG Cong1, WU Min1, WANG Zhen4   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Longdong University, Qingyang, Gansu 745000, China; 3. Department of Transport of Hainan Province, Haikou, Hainan 570204 China; 4. Shandong Hi-speed Technology Development Group Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shangdong 250001, China
  • Received:2019-12-18 Revised:2020-04-21 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Hainan Provincial Transportation Science and Technology Project (HNZXY2015-045R).

Abstract: In order to study the dynamic response characteristics of pile foundation under the pile-soil-fault coupling effect, four different types of seismic waves with the peak acceleration of 0.35g are selected for shaking table test. The acceleration response, relative displacement of pile top, bending moment of pile body and damage of pile foundation under different types of seismic waves are studied. The test results show that the parameters of the pile on hanging wall are obviously larger than those on the footwall of the fault, showing the hanging wall effect. The peak acceleration of pile top is greater than that of pile bottom, and the upper soil layer has filtering effect on the input seismic wave. The acceleration response of pile top has hysteresis compared with that of pile bottom. The acceleration at the top of the pile and the amplification coefficient α of the peak acceleration are the largest for the El-Centro wave. The α difference between the hanging wall and footwall is the largest for the Kobe wave. The peak values of relative displacement of pile top and bending moment of pile foundation are the largest for the Kobe wave. The bending moment of pile body is larger at the soil interface. When different types of seismic wave are applied, the peak value of bending moment of pile body does not exceed the bending capacity of pile body. It is suggested that the pile foundation of bridge near fault in strong earthquake area can be checked according to different seismic waveforms.

Key words: geotechnical engineering, piles foundation, shaking table test, dynamic response, meizoseismal area, near fault

CLC Number: 

  • TU 473
[1] LAI Tian-wen, LEI Hao, WU Zhi-xin, WU Hong-gang, . Shaking table test study on basalt fiber reinforced plastics in high slope protection [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 390-400.
[2] XU Chao, LUO Min-min, REN Fei-fan, SHEN Pan-pan, YANG Zi-fan. Experimental study on seismic behaviour of reinforced soil flexible abutment composite structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[3] LI Fu-xiu, WU Zhi-jian, YAN Wu-jian, ZHAO Duo-yin, . Research on dynamic response characteristics of loess tableland slopes based on shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(9): 2880-2890.
[4] ZHUANG Yan, LI Shao-bang, CUI Xiao-yan, DONG Xiao-qiang, WANG Kang-yu, . Investigation on dynamic response of subgrade and soil arching effect in piled embankment under high-speed railway loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(9): 3119-3130.
[5] XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, DU Xiu-li, CHEN Su, HAN Jun-yan, . Study on solid-liquid phase transition characteristics of saturated sand based on large shaking table test on free field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[6] YANG Chang-wei, TONG Xin-hao, WANG Dong, TAN Xin-rong, GUO Xue-yan, CAO Li-cong, . Shaking table test of dynamic response law of subgrade with ballast track under earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[7] QIAO Xiang-jin, LIANG Qing-guo, CAO Xiao-ping, WANG Li-li, . Research on dynamic responses of the portal in bridge-tunnel connected system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[8] REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, LAI Lin. Centrifugal shaking table test on dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope in strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[9] HAN Jun-yan, LI Man-jun, ZHONG Zi-lan, XU Jing-shu, LI Li-yun, LAN Jing-yan, DU Xiu-li. Seismic response of soil under non-uniform excitation based on shaking table test of buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[10] ZHANG Lu-ming, ZHOU Yong, FAN Gang, CAI Hong-yu, DONG Yun. Seismic behavior research and reinforcement effect evaluation of composite retaining structures with nuclear safety level anti-dip layered soft rock slope under strong earthquakes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[11] WANG Li-an, ZHAO Jian-chang, HOU Xiao-qiang, LIU Sheng-wei, WANG Zuo-wei. Lamb problem for non-homogeneous saturated half-space [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[12] PAN Dan-guang, CHENG Ye, CHEN Qing-jun. Shaking table test of the effect of underground shopping mall structure on ground motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[13] LI Ping, ZHANG Yu-dong, BO Tao, GU Jun-ru, ZHU Sheng. Study of ground motion effect of trapezoidal valley site based on centrifuge shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[14] FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, WANG Cheng-long, CHEN Zhi-xiong. Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[15] SHI Xu-chao, SUN Yun-de. Analysis of the evolution of excess pore water pressure in soft soil under linear unloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1333-1338.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[3] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[4] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[5] CHU Xi-hua, XU Yuan-jie. Studies on transformation from M-C criterion to Drucker-Prager criterions based on distortion energy density[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .
[6] GUO Jun-hui, CHEN Wei-guo, ZHANG Bin. Research on creep property of geogrids at a low temperature[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3009 -3012 .
[7] LENG Wu-ming, YANG Qi, LIU Qing-tan, NIE Ru-song. Study of new method for calcutating response of piled bridge abutment in soft ground[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3079 -3085 .
[8] ZHOU Xiao-jie, JIE Yu-xin, LI Guang-xin. Numerical simulation of piping based on coupling seepage and pipe flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3154 -3158 .
[9] JIANG Xiao-wei, WAN Li, WANG Xu-sheng, WU Xiong, CHENG Hui-hong. Estimation of depth-dependent hydraulic conductivity and deformation modulus using RQD[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3163 -3167 .
[10] LIU Xiao, TANG Hui-ming, LUO Hong-ming, CHEN Sou-yi. Study of seepage flow for Chinese design codes of landslide stabilization[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3173 -3180 .