Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 453-465.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1301

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A semi-analytical model for analyzing the transport of organic pollutants through the geomembrane composite cut-off wall and aquifer system

ZHENG Zi-jing1, 2, ZHU Yun-hai3, WANG Qiao1, 2, XIE Hai-jian1, 2, CHEN Yun2, 4   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310028, China; 3. Huadong Engineering Corporation limited, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China; 4. The Architectural Design & Research Institute of Zhejiang University Co, Ltd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310028, China
  • Received:2021-08-11 Revised:2021-10-21 Online:2022-02-11 Published:2022-02-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Research and Development Program for “Pioneer” and “Leading Goose” of Zhejiang Province (2022C03051), the National Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1806005, 2018YFC1802303), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41931289, 41977223) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province for Distinguished Young Scholars (LR20E080002).

Abstract: In order to evaluate the antifouling performance of the composite cut-off wall composed of geomembrane and soil- bentonite to the organic pollutants, a one-dimensional transient diffusion model was established to describe the diffusion behavior of pollutants through the composite cut-off wall when the pollutants were degraded in the source region. The solution of the analytical model was calculated by the Laplace transform and the Talbot numerical inversion. When the effects of pollutant diffusion and degradation were considered under the 3rd type inlet boundary condition, the 100-year breakthrough concentration of the type I (geomembrane/soil-bentonite) and type II (soil-bentonite/geomembrane/soil-bentonite) composite cut-off walls decreased by 59% and 53% than that under the 1st type inlet boundary condition, respectively. Since the permeability coefficient of geomembrane was assumed to be higher than 10–12 m/s, the convection of pollutants in the composite cut-off wall cannot be ignored. Thus, the type II composite cut-off wall enabled the soil-bentonite to play a dominant role in isolating the organic pollutants better. By reducing the permeability coefficient of geomembrane from 10–10 m/s to 10–16 m/s, the breakthrough time of type I composite cut-off wall was increased from 26 years to 188 years, and that of type II composite cut-off wall was increased from 32 years to 81 years, correspondingly. The antifouling performance of the composite cut-off wall can be effectively increased by adopting the methods, such as adjusting the negative head loss inside and outside the wall by a pumping well, and increasing the degradation capacity of pollutants in the source region.

Key words: degradable organic pollutant, inlet boundary condition, geomembrane, composite cut-off wall, numerical inversion;

CLC Number: 

  • X 53
[1] HOU Juan, XING Xing, XU Dong, LU Xiang-qian, . Experimental study on dynamic shear characteristics of a geomembrane-geotextile interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(2): 365-376.
[2] GAO Jun-li, XU Hong-fei, CAO Wei, YUAN Chuan . Drawing test and mesoscopic analysis of ribbed geomembrane / sandy soil interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4668-4674.
[3] LI Bo, XIAO Xian-bo, XU Tang-jin, ZHOU Song,. Experiment on connecting form between cutoff wall and composite geomembrane of cofferdam with existing wall mud [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1761-1766.
[4] LIU Jun, LI Bo. Study of connecting form between cutoff wall and composite geomembrane [J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 531-536.
[5] YUAN Jun-ping ,CAO Xue-shan ,HE Gui-ling ,WANG Bao ,LIU Ying-hao ,YIN Zong-ze , . Field test study of mechanism of bulge phenomenon under geomembrane in plain reservoir [J]. , 2014, 35(1): 67-73.
[6] GAO Jun-li,ZHANG Meng-xi. Stability analysis of reinforced geomembrane liner system [J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2608-2614.
[7] GAO Jun-li, ZHANG Meng-xi. A formula for calculating additional stresses in interface between geomembrane and sand [J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3459-3463.
[8] GAO Jun-li,ZHANG Meng-xi,LIN Yong-liang,QIU Cheng-chun. Analysis of interaction mechanism of reinforced geomembrane and sandy soil interface [J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2465-2471.
[9] GAO Jun-li,ZHANG Meng-xi,ZHANG Wen-jie. Interface property between sand and reinforced geomembrane [J]. , 2011, 32(11): 3225-3230.
[10] XU Si-fa, WANG Guo-cai, WANG Zhe. Evaluation of tensile forces of geomembrane placed on waste landfill slope due to temperature variation and filling height [J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3120-3124.
[11] WANG Guang-yue,LI Hua-luan,LI Yan-qin. Experimental research on creep properties of composite geomembrane [J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1599-1603.
[12] CEN Wei-jun, SHEN Chang-song, TONG Jian-wen. Study of construction behavior of composite geomembrane rockfill dam on thick alluvium deposit [J]. , 2009, 30(1): 175-180.
[13] LIN Wei-an, ZHU Bin, CHEN Yun-min, ZHAN Liang-tong. Tension analysis of geomembrane in landfill slope considering interface strain-softening [J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2063-2069.
[14] GONG Lv-hua , LI Qing-yun , BAO Cheng-gang,. Development of geomembrane strain gauge and its application (Ⅰ): gauges [J]. , 2005, 26(9): 1502-1507.
[15] GONG Lü-hua , LI Qing-yun , BAO Cheng-gang,. Development of geomembrane strain gauge and its application (II): Application [J]. , 2005, 26(12): 2035-2040.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .