›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1761-1766.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2407

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experiment on connecting form between cutoff wall and composite geomembrane of cofferdam with existing wall mud

LI Bo1, XIAO Xian-bo2, XU Tang-jin3, ZHOU Song3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China; 2. Huzhou Vocational and Technical College, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China; 3. Construction and Design Department, Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2016-10-12 Online:2018-05-11 Published:2018-06-12
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Central Research Institutes of Basic Research and Public Service Special Operations (CKSF2017012/YT), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51308067), Zhejiang Public Welfare Technology Research Project (LGF18E080004), Huzhou Natural Science Fund Project (2016GY19) and the Systematic Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety (2016ZDK011, 2014ZDK0010).

Abstract: The combination of cutoff wall and composite geomembrane is usually used as the imperious system recent years. The uncoordinated deformation between the cutoff wall and the fillings will cause the composite geomembrane cracks. The connecting form between cutoff wall and composite geomembrane is studied through geotechnical centrifuge tests. Four model tests considering the cutoff wall, wall mud, the backfilled materials and the connecting form are performed to investigate the variation of the strain of the composite membrane. When the geomembrane is laid horizontally on the top level of the cutoff wall, it is seriously strengthened at the connection near the cutoff wall, and the geomembrane is broken down when the differential settlement increases to a certain value. When the geomembrane is first laid vertically above the cutoff wall and then horizontally extended outward, the tensile strain of geomembrane is less at the connection. The longer the distance to the connection point, the less the strain. The existence of wall mud can effectively alleviate the local strain of the geomembrane.

Key words: cofferdam, centrifugal model test, composite geomembrane, strain, cutoff wall, mud

CLC Number: 

  • TV 223.4

[1] ZHANG Ke, LI Na, CHEN Yu-long, LIU Wen-lian, . Evolution characteristics of strain field and infrared radiation temperature field during deformation and rupture process of fractured sandstone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[2] LI Li-hua, YU Xiao-ting, XIAO Heng-lin, MA Qiang, LIU Yi-ming, YANG Xing, . Mechanical properties of reinforcement about rice husk ash mixed soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[3] DUAN Jun-yi, YANG Guo-lin, HU Min, QIU Ming-ming, YU Yun, . Experimental study on deformation characteristics of reinforced soil cushion subjected to loading and unloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[4] WANG Kang-yu, ZHUANG Yan, GENG Xue-yu, . Experimental study on critical dynamic stress of coarse-grained soil in railway subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[5] ZHU Nan, LIU Chun-yuan, ZHAO Xian-hui, WANG Wen-jing, . Micro-structure characteristics of structured clay under different stress paths in K0 consolidated drained tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[6] ZHANG Qing-yan, CHEN Wei-zhong, YUAN Jing-qiang, LIU-Qi, RONG Chi, . Experimental study on evolution characteristics of water and mud inrush in fault fractured zone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1911-1922.
[7] LIANG Ke, CHEN Guo-xing, HANG Tian-zhu, LIU Kang, HE Yang, . A new prediction model of small-strain shear modulus of sandy soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1963-1970.
[8] LIU Xin-yu, ZHANG Xian-wei, YUE Hao-zhen, KONG Ling-wei, XU Chao, . SHPB tests on dynamic impact behavior of granite residual soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[9] ZHANG Zhen, ZHANG Zhao, YE Guan-bao, WANG Meng, XIAO Yan, CHENG Yi, . Progressive failure mechanism of stiffened deep mixed column-supported embankment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[10] TAO Shuai, DONG Yi, WEI Chang-fu, . Small-strain stiffness test system of soil under controllable environmental humidity [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2132-2142.
[11] LI Jia-long, LI Gang, YU Long. Inelasticity-separated plane-strain element model and its application to Drucker-Prager model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1492-1501.
[12] HOU Zhi-qiang, WANG Yu, LIU Dong-qiao, LI Chang-hong, LIU Hao. Experimental study of mechanical properties of marble under triaxial unloading confining pressure after fatigue loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1510-1520.
[13] HAN Chao, PANG De-peng, LI De-jian. Analysis of energy evolution during the step loading and unloading creep experiments of sandstone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[14] LI Min, MENG De-jiao, YAO Xin-yu, . Optimization of requirement for two kinds of ash solidified materials used in oil contaminated saline soil considering temperature sensitivity [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1203-1210.
[15] ZHOU En-quan, ZONG Zhi-xin, WANG Qiong, LU Jian-fei, ZUO Xi. Dynamic characteristics of pipe buried in rubber-silt lightweight mixtures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!