Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1207-1214.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1618

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental study of pullout behavior of horizontal anchor plates in geogrid reinforced sand

ZHU Hong-hu1, 2, GAO Yu-xin1, LI Yuan-hai2, NI Yu-fei1   

  1. 1. School of Earth Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; 2. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics & Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2021-09-22 Revised:2021-12-28 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program Project (2018YFC1505104), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077235) and the Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering (SKLGDUEK1902).

Abstract: Geogrid reinforcements can effectively improve the pullout capacity of anchor plates, but the failure mechanism and influencing factors during the uplift process need to be further investigated. In this paper, a series of uplift tests was carried out on horizontal anchor plates in sand to investigate their pullout characteristics, and the influence of various factors was analyzed, including sand density, anchor embedment depth, and number of geogrids and their locations. The particle image velocimetry (PIV) technology was used to explore the deformation and failure mechanism of the sand around anchor plates. The results show that for the pullout capacity of an anchor plate is significantly enhanced by one layer of contact-type geogrid, and the reinforcing effect is better than that with non-contact geogrid. This phenomenon is associated with mobilized friction of the geogrid and the increased weight of sand within the failure surface. When two layers of geogrids are installed, the lower geogrid plays a dominant role in restricting the lateral soil deformation and homogenizing the stress distribution, and the contribution of the upper geogrid is relatively low. Whether geogrids are applied or not will alter the deformation mechanism at the anchor-sand interface. With geogrid reinforcement, the failure surface converges inward, and the shear strain distribution is more uniform.

Key words: geogrid reinforcement, uplift of anchor plate, pullout capacity, particle image velocimetry (PIV), interface behavior

CLC Number: 

  • TU 470
[1] LIU Fang-cheng, WU Meng-tao, YANG Jun, . Experimental study of strength characteristics of geogrid reinforced rubber sand mixtures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 580-591.
[2] XIONG Xiao-rong, TANG Hua, LIAO Ming-jin, YIN Xiao-tao, WANG Dong-ying,. Laboratory model test on “wedge-effect” of pullout capacity of tunnel-type anchorage [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 181-190.
[3] ZHENG Jun-jie, CAO Wen-zhao, ZHOU Yan-jun, JIANG Jin-guo. Pull-out test study of interface behavior between triaxial geogrid and soil [J]. , 2017, 38(2): 317-324.
[4] LIAO Ming-jin , WANG Quan-cai , YUAN Cong-hua , TANG Hua , ZHANG Shui-hua,. Research on the pull-out capacity of the tunnel-type anchorage based on wedge-effect [J]. , 2016, 37(1): 185-192.
[5] CAI Jian-tao. Pull-out test on interface behavior between expansive soils and geogrids [J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 204-208.
[6] LI Zheng ,WANG Bo ,HE Chuan ,LI Fu-hai ,ZHU Pei ,SONG Yang , . Experimental study of corrosion resistance of multiple anticorrosive bolts [J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1071-1077.
[7] QI Chang-Guang , FAN Gao-feng , CUI Yun-liang , ZHANG Qiang,. Geotechnical physical model test using artificial synthetic transparent soil [J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3157-3163.
[8] LIN Yong-liang , ZHANG Bo , ZHANG Meng-xi , ZHAO Gang-fei . Micro and meso-mechanism study of interface behavior of earth reinforced with denti-inclusions [J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2863-2868.
[9] HUANG Fu,YANG Xiao-li,ZHAO Lian-heng,HUANG Kan. Upper bound solution of ultimate pullout capacity of strip plate anchor based on Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. , 2012, 33(1): 179-184.
[10] LIU Ming-liang,ZHU Zhen-de,LIU Jin-yuan. Experimental study of failure mechanism of uplifting anchor [J]. , 2011, 32(3): 697-702.
[11] LI Qi-ren, WANG Ming-yuan, CAI Jian-tao, SHI Ge-liang. Effect of water content on pull-out behavior of interface between geogrid and compacted expansive soil [J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 175-178.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .