Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1645-1656.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0983

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental study on the mechanical response of buried pipelines under different subsidence patterns

ZHANG Yu1, LIANG Hao1, LIN Liang2, ZHOU You2, ZHAO Qing-song3   

  1. 1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China; 2. Qingdao Fusion Bridgehead Development Co., Ltd., Qingdao, Shandong 266500, China; 3. Chambroad Holding Group, Binzhou, Shandong 256599, China
  • Received:2022-06-28 Accepted:2022-11-30 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51890914, 52179119), the Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (ZR2019MEEO01) and the Provincial National Science Foundation of Shanxi (2021JM-373).

Abstract: The frequent occurrence of buried pipeline accidents caused by the ground collapse and subsidence makes it urgent to carry out experimental studies on the mechanical response under different subsidence effects. A systematical survey of the pipeline strain, earth pressure and soil deformation was conducted considering the effects of ground subsidence and collapse. The result showed that due to the arching effect at the top of the pipeline, the strain and earth pressure firstly increased and then decreased with the extension of the collapse zone, while they increased as the subsidence zone extended during the collapse and settlement. In the subsidence and collapse zones, the pipeline along the axial direction exhibited a saddle shape with both ends convex and concave in the middle. Pipeline deformation was more significantly affected by the subsidence. When the subsidence and collapse were both 50 mm, the maximum strain at the top, bottom and middle of the pipeline increased by approximately 18.8%, 249% and 273% compared to the ground collapse, respectively. It could be seen by comparing the ratio of the increasing area to the decreasing area of earth pressure around the pipeline λ that λ in the subsidence was increased by 78% compared with that in the collapse; therefore, the pipeline was subjected to larger earth pressure during the subsidence. Based on the modified Marston calculation model, a method for predicting the vertical earth pressure during ground subsidence was proposed, and the accuracy of the method was verified using the model test results.

Key words: pipeline, ground subsidence, soil collapse, pipeline strain, earth pressure around the pipeline

CLC Number: 

  • TE832
[1] REN Jian-dong, ZHAO Yi-xin, SUN Zhong-bo, WANG Wen, LIU Shi-min. Protective coal pillar optimization and multi-parameter evolution characteristics of buried pipeline in gas-coal superposition area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(9): 2679-2695.
[2] YANG Yang, TIAN Ying-hui, ZHANG Chun-hui, WANG Rong, WANG Zhi-chao, WANG Le, . Penetration resistance evolution characteristics and mesoscopic mechanism of submarine pipeline in sandy seabed [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1001-1008.
[3] FAN Hao-bo, ZHOU Ding-kun, LIU Yong, SONG Yu-xiang, ZHU Zheng-guo, ZHU Yong-quan, GAO Xin-qiang, GUO Jia-qi, . Mechanical response characteristics of lining structure of pipeline karst tunnels in water-rich areas [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 1884-1898.
[4] SHI Jiang-wei, FAN Yan-bo, PEI Wei-wei, CHEN Yong-hui, ZHANG Xian, . An investigation of deformation mechanisms of jointed pipelines due to underneath tunnel excavation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[5] WANG Jin-an, ZHOU Jia-xing, LI Fei . Study on temporal and spatial evolution law of landslide and mechanical response of overburden pipe [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2155-2167.
[6] HAN Jun-yan, HOU Ben-wei, ZHONG Zi-lan, ZHAO Mi, LI Li-yun, DU Xiu-li. Research on shaking table test scheme of buried pipeline under multi-point non-uniform seismic excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2127-2139.
[7] WANG Teng, WU Rui. Study of vertical penetration resistance of seabed pipelines in cohesive soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 871-878.
[8] WANG Yu-fei, LIU Run. Study on vertical-horizontal failure envelopes of shallow-embedded pipelines on sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 1129-1139.
[9] FENG Ling-yun, ZHU Bin, DAI Jia-lin, KONG De-qiong, . Modelling lateral pipe-soil interaction on soft clay using large displacement sequential limit analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4907-4915.
[10] FAN Ning, NIAN Ting-kai, JIAO Hou-bin, ZHENG De-feng, . Effect and mechanism of disaster reduction of pipelines with double-elliptic streamline contour against impact of submarine landslides [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 413-420.
[11] LI Hai-li, ZHANG Chen-rong, LU Kai,. Nonlinear analysis of response of buried pipelines induced by tunneling [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 289-296.
[12] WANG Xiao-wen, ZHANG Jian-min, LEE C F, . Wave-induced interaction of saturated sandy seabed with pipeline [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2499-2508.
[13] HAN Jun-yan, DU Xiu-li, HOU Ben-wei, LI Li-yun, ZHONG Zi-lan, ZHAO Mi (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing , China. A simplified analysis model for pipe-soil structural seismic responses under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4651-4658.
[14] WEI Gang, LIN Xiong, JIN Rui, DING Zhi,. Security discrimination of adjacent underground pipelines during the construction of twin shield tunnels [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 181-190.
[15] HUANG Xiao-kang, LU Kun-lin, ZHU Da-yong,. Simulation test study of deformations of pipelines located at different geometric positions arising from shield tunneling [J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 123-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .