Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1849-1862.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1023

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles    

Discrete element simulation on aeolian sand-geogrid pull-out test with different boundary conditions

DU Wei1, NIE Ru-song1, 2, LI Lie-lie3, TAN Yong-chang1, ZHANG Jie1, QI Yan-lu4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. MOE Key Laboratory of Engineering Structures of Heavy Haul Railway, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 3. College of Water Resources and Hydropower, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450045, China; 4. Xinjiang Railway Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, China
  • Received:2022-07-04 Accepted:2022-09-13 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research and Development Program of China Railway Urumqi Bureau Group Co., Ltd. (WLMQ-KGHZGS-HRTL-GGB-2020-0032), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878666) and the National Engineering Laboratory of High-speed Railway Construction Technology Open Fund Project (HSR201905).

Abstract:

The boundary and loading device of the physical model of laboratory geogrid pull-out tests are usually rigid, but the boundary conditions of the geogrid in engineering application cannot always correspond to the physical model boundary of laboratory pull-out test. In order to study the effect of boundary conditions on the pull-out test results, this paper uses three-dimensional discrete element method to carry out numerical simulation on the pull-out tests of geogrid-reinforced aeolian sand based on the laboratory triaxial and pull-out tests. The effects of four combination conditions, namely rigid top surface and rigid front wall (RTRP), flexible top surface and rigid front wall (FTRP), rigid top surface and flexible front wall (RTFP), and flexible top surface and flexible front wall (FTFP), on the macroscopic and mesoscopic characteristics of reinforced soil interface are studied. The relationship between pull-out force and pull-out displacement, interface shear strength, force chain, porosity distribution and particle rotation law were analyzed under different combination conditions. The displacement of rigid loading plate and flexible boundary particles, the deformation of geogrids under FTFP combination, and the evolution law of shear band during pull-out were examined. The results show that the rigid and flexible boundary of the front wall of the model has a great influence on the pull-out force curve pattern and interface friction angle. Under rigid front wall boundary conditions, the pull-out force and displacement curves are machining softening, while the pull force and displacement curves are approximately double-folded under the boundary condition of flexible front wall. When the front wall of the model changes from rigid to flexible, the friction angle of the interface decreases by 7º− 8º. When the normal pressure is less than 90 kPa, it is suggested that the peak reduction coefficients of the FTRP combination, RTFP combination and FTFP combination should be 0.9, 0.6 and 0.7, respectively. In the process of pull-out test, the specimen volumes under the four combinations expand and show dilatancy. The shear band thickness distributions of RTRP and FTRP are 5.38 and 10.79 times of the medium particle diameter. The shear bands of RTFP and FTFP have a wider distribution range. The research results are helpful to further reveal the interaction mechanism between geogrid and aeolian sand under rigid and flexible loading modes as well as rigid and flexible front wall boundary.

Key words: pull-out test, boundary conditions, discrete element method, aeolian sand

CLC Number: 

  • TU411
[1] TIAN Sheng-kui, LIU Guan-shi, ZHAO Qing-song, XU Guo-fang, CAI Ming-xuan, . Experimental study of capillary water rising in aeolian sand using a moisture field testing technique based on image RGB information [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(9): 2525-2536.
[2] LIU Jia-ying, XU Zhi-chao , WEI Gang, HU Cheng-bao, SUN Miao-miao , WANG Yu-ting. Complex network analysis of force chain structure for granular materials under loading and unloading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(9): 2767-2778.
[3] LUO Zuo-sen, ZHU Zuo-xiang, SU Qing, LI Jian-lin, DENG Hua-feng, YANG Chao, . Creep simulation and deterioration mechanism of sandstone under water-rock interaction based on parallel bond model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(8): 2445-2457.
[4] DENG Peng-hai, LIU Quan-sheng, HUANG Xing, . Progressive fracture and swelling deformation of tunnel floor: a new floor heave mechanism [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(5): 1512-1529.
[5] YANG Yang, TIAN Ying-hui, ZHANG Chun-hui, WANG Rong, WANG Zhi-chao, WANG Le, . Penetration resistance evolution characteristics and mesoscopic mechanism of submarine pipeline in sandy seabed [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1001-1008.
[6] HUANG Wei, JIAN Wen-bin, YANG Jian, DOU Hong-qiang, LUO Jin-mei, . Prototype test and load transfer characteristic analysis of multi-disk anchor rod [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(2): 520-530.
[7] DENG Peng-hai, LIU Quan-sheng, HUANG Xing, PAN Yu-cong, BO Yin, . Combined finite-discrete element numerical study on the buckling failure mechanism of horizontally layered soft rock mass [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 508-523.
[8] SHEN Hao-han, ZHANG Hai, FAN Jun-kai, XU Rui-yang, ZHANG Xiao-ming. Influence of contact radius on rock mechanical property and its application in discrete element method software EDEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 580-590.
[9] YANG Lei, TU Dong-mei, ZHU Qi-yin, WU Ze-xiang, YU Chuang, . Experimental research on discrete element method of particle cyclic thermal consolidation considering the influence of variable temperature amplitude [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 591-600.
[10] LIU Yun-he, WANG Qi, NING Zhi-yuan, MENG Xiao, DONG Jing, YANG Di-xiong, . Development of a linear parallel bond model considering damage and parameter influence analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(3): 615-624.
[11] WANG Jia-quan, QI Hang-xiang, LIN Zhi-nan, TANG Yi, . Pull-out test on geosynthetic reinforced sand based on digital image analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(12): 3259-3269.
[12] DONG Qi, WANG Yuan, FENG Di, . Discrete element simulation and experimental study on the initiation pressure of hydraulic fracturing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(12): 3270-3280.
[13] LIU Biao, WANG Qiao, ZHANG Zong-liang, ZHOU Wei, FENG Y T, PENG Zhang-zhen, LI Yun-sheng, XU Jun, GUO Kai, . Calculation of stress field and particle breakage paths for granular system based on the combined boundary-discrete element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(12): 3493-3502.
[14] XIAO Fei, KONG Ling-wei, LIU Guan-shi, FENG Heng, DONG Yi-yi, ZENG Er-xian, . Uplift model test and capacity calculation method of metal grillage foundation in medium dense aeolian sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 65-75.
[15] ZHANG Heng-zhi, XU Chang-jie, HE Zhai-bing, HUANG Zhan-jun, HE Xiao-hui, . Study of active earth pressure of finite soils under different retaining wall movement modes based on discrete element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 257-267.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .