Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 3259-3269.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0083

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Pull-out test on geosynthetic reinforced sand based on digital image analysis

WANG Jia-quan1, 2, QI Hang-xiang1, 2, LIN Zhi-nan1, 2, TANG Yi1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi 545006, China; 2. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Engineering Research Center of Geotechnical Disaster and Ecological Control, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi 545006, China
  • Received:2022-01-17 Revised:2022-03-02 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41962017), the Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi of China (2022GXNSFDA035081), the High Level Innovation Team and Outstanding Scholars Program of Guangxi Institutions of Higher Learning of China and the Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (YCSW2021310).

Abstract:

Due to the complexity of the reinforced soil interface, the empirical methods are often used when laying geogrid in reinforced soil engineering construction, which largely causes the waste of geogrids and engineering safety hazards. Clarifying the influence range of the interfacial action of reinforced soil with different fillers is helpful to determine the reasonable reinforcement spacing of reinforced soil structures. In order to reveal the influence range of interface action between reinforcement and soil of different fillers, a series of pull-out tests was carried out with four types of sand and geogrid under different normal stresses. By combining with digital image measurement technology, the evolution laws of interfacial shear band thickness, particle displacement vector, peak pullout resistance, and strain of geogrid for different types of sand were analyzed. The results show that the thickness of interfacial shear band H increases with the increase of normal stress σv and the average particle size of sand d50. Through the multivariate fitting method, the function expressions among the thickness of the interfacial shear band H, the normal stress σ v and the average particle size of the sand 50 are obtained. In the pull-out process of geogrid, the displacement vector of sand particles is significantly different when the geogrid is taken as the boundary. The displacement vector of particles above the geogrid is significantly larger than that below the geogrid, and there is a concentration band of particle displacement vectors in a certain range above and below the geogrid. The peak pullout resistance increases with the increase of normal stress σ v and the average particle size of sand 50. The geogrid strain of each section of different types of sand shows a decreasing trend from the front to the rear.

Key words: types of sand, pull-out test, geogrid strain, interface shear band, displacement vector

CLC Number: 

  • TU431
[1] HUANG Wei, JIAN Wen-bin, YANG Jian, DOU Hong-qiang, LUO Jin-mei, . Prototype test and load transfer characteristic analysis of multi-disk anchor rod [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(2): 520-530.
[2] WANG Jia-quan, KANG Bo-wen, ZHOU Yuan-wu, TANG Ying, . Effect of coarse particle content on pull-out behavior of reinforced-soil interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1249-1260.
[3] JIANG Tong, ZHAI Tian-ya, ZHANG Jun-ran, ZHAO Jin-di, WANG Li-jin, SONG Chen-yu, PAN Xu-wei. Diametric splitting tests on loess based on particle image velocimetry technique [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(8): 2120-2126.
[4] FENG Zhong-ju, JIANG Guan, ZHAO Rui-xin, LONG Hou-sheng, WANG Zheng-bin, ZHANG Zheng-xu, . Study on pre-stress long term loss of anchor cable considering coupled multiple factors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(8): 2215-2224.
[5] CHEN Cheng, DUAN Yong-da, RUI Rui, WANG Lun. Study of single and two-layer geogrid reinforced ballasted trackbed using pull-out test and discrete element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 954-962.
[6] YANG Jian, JIAN Wen-bin, HUANG Wei, HUANG Cong-hui, LUO Jin-mei, LI Xian-zhong, . Pull-out test and ultimate bearing capacity calculation of grouting branch-type anchor [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 1126-1132.
[7] FENG Jun, WANG Yang, ZHANG Yu-feng, HUANG Lin, HE Chang-jiang, WU Hong-gang, . Experimental comparison of anchorage performance between basalt fiber and steel bars [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[8] ZHAO Xiang-zhuo, ZHANG Hong-wei, CAO Chen , ZHANG Ming,. Optimisation of bolt rib spacing and anchoring force under different conditions of surrounding rock [J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1263-1270.
[9] CUI Qiang, CHENG Yong-feng, LU Xian-long, XIE Feng, SUN Fu-tao, . In-situ pull-out test and parametric study of load-displacement model for hole digging foundation in the strong weathered rock mass [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4597-4604.
[10] ZHENG Jun-jie, CAO Wen-zhao, ZHOU Yan-jun, JIANG Jin-guo. Pull-out test study of interface behavior between triaxial geogrid and soil [J]. , 2017, 38(2): 317-324.
[11] CAI Jian-tao. Pull-out test on interface behavior between expansive soils and geogrids [J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 204-208.
[12] XIA Yuan-you , CHEN Chun-shu , BAKRI Mudthir , WANG Zhi-de , ZHOU Xiong,. Analysis of horizontal displacement of soil induced by shallow tunnel excavation [J]. , 2015, 36(2): 354-360.
[13] MIAO Chen-xi ,ZHENG Jun-jie ,CUI Ming-juan ,XIE Ming-xing ,ZHAO Jian-bin,. Discrete element simulation of interface characteristic and frictional properties of triaxial geogrid [J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 423-430.
[14] ZHANG Chong-lei , JIANG Guan-lu , YUAN Sheng-yang , WANG Wei , . Dynamic response analysis of column-net structure subgrade and reinforced cushion under cyclic loading [J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1664-1670.
[15] MIAO Chen-xi ,ZHENG Jun-jie ,CUI Ming-juan ,XIE Ming-xing ,ZHAO Jian-bin,. Study of influence of joint protuberance on geogrid reinforcement performance by discrete element method [J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1181-1186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .