Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 954-962.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1191

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study of single and two-layer geogrid reinforced ballasted trackbed using pull-out test and discrete element method

CHEN Cheng, DUAN Yong-da, RUI Rui, WANG Lun   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • Received:2020-08-12 Revised:2020-10-13 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708438) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018IVB029).

Abstract: Geogrid is used to reinforce the trackbed by increasing the confining pressure and reducing the vertical cumulative settlement and lateral displacement of ballast. In order to further study the reinforcement mechanism of geogrid reinforced ballast, pull-out tests of single and double-layer geogrids with large and small apertures under static load were carried out by using self-designed equipment, and the influences of grid aperture, reinforcement depth and number of layers on pull-out resistance were analyzed. The standard values of pull-out resistance at different depths were obtained by single-layer tests, and the coefficient of double-layer reinforcement was proposed to quantify the reinforcement capacity of double-layer geogrids, and the best laying way was also discussed. Double-layer geogrids with aperture size of 65 mm placed in 200-300 mm were simulated by DEM. The distribution of internal stress chain and contact force vector of geogrid reinforced ballast during pull-out process were analyzed from the micro view. The results show that, for the graded ballast, the geogrid with 65 mm aperture performed better than that with 32 mm aperture; the ultimate pullout resistance of double-layer laying was greater than the sum of the standard values of the two-layer laying. The double-layer reinforcement effect is related to the geogrid aperture and the layer spacing. The simulation results also verified the superposition of reinforcement effect between the two-layer geogrids during pull-out process, and the distribution of normal contact force vector showed that the double-layer geogrid had interlocking reinforcement effect.

Key words: ballast, geogrid, pull-out test, double-layer reinforcement, reinforcement effect coefficient, DEM

CLC Number: 

  • TU 443
[1] FENG Zhong-ju, JIANG Guan, ZHAO Rui-xin, LONG Hou-sheng, WANG Zheng-bin, ZHANG Zheng-xu, . Study on pre-stress long term loss of anchor cable considering coupled multiple factors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(8): 2215-2224.
[2] XIANG Fu-lin, YANG Tian-liang, GU Kai, SHI Bin, LIU Chun, LIU Su-ping, ZHANG Cheng-cheng, JIANG Yue-hua, . Discrete element numerical simulation of cable-soil deformation compatibility in borehole distributed optical fiber monitoring [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(6): 1743-1754.
[3] HONG Cheng-yu, YANG Qiang, ZHAO Yong, CHEN Deng-wei, YU Wei. Strain monitoring mechanism of geogrids based on optical fiber sensing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(6): 1755-1764.
[4] CHEN Xiao-bin, YANG Ning-yu, ZHU Yu, ZHANG Jun-qi, QIAO Shi-fan, . Investigation on stress-strain relationship of TDA-graded aggregate mixtures in large-scale triaxial test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 921-931.
[5] YANG Jian, JIAN Wen-bin, HUANG Wei, HUANG Cong-hui, LUO Jin-mei, LI Xian-zhong, . Pull-out test and ultimate bearing capacity calculation of grouting branch-type anchor [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 1126-1132.
[6] XUE Ya-dong, ZHOU Jie, ZHAO Feng, LI Xing. Rock breaking mechanism of TBM cutter based on MatDEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 337-346.
[7] WANG Ming-nian, JIANG Yong-tao, YU Li, DONG Yu-cang, DUAN Ru-yu, . Analytical solution of startup critical hydraulic gradient of fine particles migration in sandy soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(8): 2515-2524.
[8] YANG Chang-wei, TONG Xin-hao, WANG Dong, TAN Xin-rong, GUO Xue-yan, CAO Li-cong, . Shaking table test of dynamic response law of subgrade with ballast track under earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[9] YANG Ji-ming, ZHANG Xiao-yong, ZHANG Fu-you, ZENG Chao-feng, MEI Guo-xiong, . Mesoscopic study on bearing characteristics of pile foundation under pile-soil-cap combined interaction in sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2271-2282.
[10] YAN Feng-xiang, BAI Xiao-hong, DONG Xiao-qiang, . Experimental study of the frictional resistance characteristics of geogrids and construction residue interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(12): 3939-3946.
[11] ZHOU Zong-qing, LI Li-ping, SHI Shao-shuai, LIU Cong, GAO Cheng-lu, TU Wen-feng, WANG Mei-xia, . Study on tunnel water inrush mechanism and simulation of seepage failure process [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(11): 3621-3631.
[12] CHEN Qing-fa, YIN Ting-chang, GAO Yuan, . Three-dimensional demarcation method of homogeneous structural domains of jointed rock masses at underground mine [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3181-3188.
[13] ZHOU Cui-ying, HUANG Si-yu, LIU Zhen, LU Yi-qi, . The interface process and its dynamic model of red-bed soft rock softening [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3189-3196.
[14] WANG Yin, ZHOU Ling-xin, YANG Qing. New drag coefficient model for irregular calcareous sand particles and its application into fluid-particle coupling simulation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 2009-2015.
[15] YIN Feng, ZHOU Hang, LIU Han-long, CHU Jian, . Experimental investigation on dynamic characteristics of XCC pile-geogrid composite foundation under static and dynamic loads of vehicles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1324-1330.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LIU Xiao,TANG Hui-ming,LIU Yu. A new model for landslide displacement prediction based on set pair analysis and fuzzy-Markov chain[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3399 -3405 .
[2] HU Da-wei, ZHOU Hui, XIE Shou-yi, ZHANG Kai, SHAO Jian-fu, FENG. Study of Biot’s coefficients of marble during plastic deformation phase[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3727 -3732 .
[3] SHI Xu-chao,HAN Yang. Water absorption test of soft clay after rebound under unloading[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 732 -736 .
[4] YUAN Xi-zhong, LI Ning , ZHAO Xiu-yun, YANG Yin-tao. Analysis of sensitivity of frozen ground bearing capacity to climate change in Northeast China permafrost regions[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3265 -3272 .
[5] BAI Bing, LI Xiao-chun, SHI Lu, TANG Li-zhong. Slope identity of elastoplastic stress-strain curve and its verification and application[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3789 -3792 .
[6] TANG Li-min. Regularization algorithm of foundation settlement prediction model[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3945 -3948 .
[7] CAI Hui-teng, WEI Fu-quan, CAI Zong-wen. Study of silty clay dynamic characteristics in Chongqing downtown area[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 224 -228 .
[8] SONG Ling , LIU Feng-yin , LI Ning . On mechanism of rotary cone penetration test[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 787 -0792 .
[9] JIN Jie-fang , LI Xi-bing , YIN Zhi-qiang , ZOU Yang. A method for defining rock damage variable by wave impedance under cyclic impact loadings[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1385 -1393 .
[10] ZHOU Yan-jun , GENG Ying-chun , WANG Gui-bin , TANG Hong-lin , LI Zu-kui. Testing and analyzing rock mechanical characteristics for deep formation[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1625 -1630 .