Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 4185-4193.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1640

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental comparison of anchorage performance between basalt fiber and steel bars

FENG Jun1, WANG Yang2, ZHANG Yu-feng1, HUANG Lin1, HE Chang-jiang1, WU Hong-gang3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China; 3. Northwest Research Institute Co., Ltd., of CREC, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2018-09-04 Online:2019-11-11 Published:2019-11-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51178402), the Technology Development Plan of China Railway Corporation (2015- key -32) and China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited (Scientific Research) (2015-KJ037-G006-03).

Abstract: Basalt fiber (BFRP) anchor has many advantages, such as high tensile strength, good corrosion resistance, etc. It is a good substitute for reinforcement in geotechnical anchorage structure, and has attracted much attention in recent years. Four groups of field pull-out tests were carried out in the loess stratum to study the failure modes and anchorage performance difference between the 25 mm diameter BFRP bolts and steel bolts. The results show that the failure signs on inner and outer surface of grouting coexist in the process of drawing for large diameter soil anchor. However, the ultimate failure mode is controlled by the interface between grouting and soil (the 2nd interface), and the damage degree of the interface between BFRP bolt and grouting (the 1st interface) is evidently higher than that of steel bolt. The ultimate bearing capacity of two bolts is similar, and the interfacial bond strength decreases with increasing anchorage length. The bond performance between the steel bolt and grouting is better than that of the BFRP bolt, which is mainly caused by the different processing technology and material mechanical properties between the two bolts. At the same load level and position, the axial force of BFRP bolt is larger than that of steel bolt, and the attenuation rate of axial force is slightly smaller than that of steel bolt; the peak shear stress of BFRP bolt is also smaller than that of steel bolt.

Key words: losses, BFRP bolts, field pull-out tests, bearing capacity, failure mode

CLC Number: 

  • TU 470
[1] LI Chao, LI Tao, JING Guo-ye, XIAO Yu-hua, . Study on the ultimate bearing capacity of surrounding soil underlying gripper of shaft boring machine [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] HUANG Wei, XIAO Wei-min, TIAN Meng-ting, ZHANG Lin-hao, . Model test research on the mechanical properties of irregular columnar jointed rock masses [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[3] ZHOU Qiang, LI Kang-ping, DUAN Ya-hui, CAO Zi-jun, LI Dian-qing, . Safety criteria for bearing capacity of foundation based on the generalized reliability ratio of safety margin [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[4] WU Xing-zheng, WANG Rui-kai, XIN Jun-xia, . Geometric reliability analysis of geotechnical structures at a specific site [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2070-2080.
[5] ZHAO Ming-hua, PENG Wen-zhe, YANG Chao-wei, XIAO Yao, LIU Ya-nan. Upper bound analysis of lateral bearing capacity of rigid piles in sloping ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[6] MENG Qing-bin, QIAN Wei, HAN Li-jun, YU Li-yuan, WANG Cong-kai, ZHOU Xing. Experimental study on formation mechanism and mechanical properties of regenerated structure of very weak cemented rock mass [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[7] YANG Xue-xiang, JIAO Yuan-fa, YANG Yu-yi, . Development and test of aerated inflation controlled anchors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[8] JIANG Nan, HUANG Lin, FENG Jun, ZHANG Sheng-liang, WANG Duo, . Research on design and calculation method of tunnel-type anchorage of railway suspension bridge [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[9] FAN Ke-wei, LIU Si-hong, LIAO Jie, FANG Bin-xin, WANG Jian-lei, . Experimental study on shearing characteristics of pebbles-filled soilbags [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[10] DAI Guo-liang, ZHU Wen-bo, GUO Jing, GONG Wei-ming, ZHAO Xue-liang, . Experiments on vertical uplift bearing capacity of suction caisson foundation in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[11] WANG Qin-ke, MA Jian-lin, CHEN Wen-long, YANG Yan-xin, HU Zhong-bo, . Centrifugal model tests and calculation method of uplift bearing capacity of rock-socketed pedestal pile overburden soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[12] ZHANG Lei, WANG Ning-wei, JING Li-ping, FANG Chen, DONG Rui, . Comparative experiments of different electrode materials on electro-osmotic consolidation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3493-3501.
[13] HAN Gang, ZHOU Hui, CHEN Jian-lin, ZHANG Chuan-qing, GAO Yang, SONG Gui-hong, HONG Wang-bing, . Engineering geological properties of interlayer staggered zones at Baihetan hydropower station [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3559-3568.
[14] ZHANG Yi-hu, WU Ai-qing, ZHOU Huo-ming, WANG Shuai, LUO Rong, FAN Lei. Review of bearing capacity and deformation characteristics of tunnel- type anchorage for suspension bridge [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3576-3584.
[15] LIU Xin-rong, DENG Zhi-yun, LIU Yong-quan, LIU SHU-lin, LU Yu-ming, . Study of cumulative damage and failure mode of horizontal layered rock slope subjected to seismic loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!