›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 863-873.

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Numerical analysis of cone penetration tests under different gravity fields by distinct element method

JIANG Ming-jing1, 2,WANG Xin-xin1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2011-10-01 Online:2013-03-11 Published:2013-03-20

Abstract: The cone penetration tests under seven different gravity fields were studied by a commercial distinct element method (DEM) code PFC2D (particle flow code) in order to investigate the relationship between cone penetration tests under high and low gravity fields. The numerical results show that cone penetration has an apparent effect on the upper zone of the ground under low gravity fields, while it has a significant effect on the lower zone of the ground under high gravity fields. The maximum (steady) values of the normalized cone tip resistance and the maximum values of normalized mean stress and deviatoric stress increase linearly with the reciprocal of gravity accelerations. The soil around the penetrometer undergoes apparently loading and unloading process during the penetration process, with the smaller gravity field corresponding to the more apparent loading and unloading phenomenon, while the upper zone of the ground undergoes the loading and unloading process more apparently than the lower zone under the same gravity field.

Key words: different gravity fields, cone penetration test, distinct element method

CLC Number: 

  • O 241
[1] LI Hong-jiang, TONG Li-yuan, LIU Song-yu, BAO Hong-yan, YANG Tao, . Parameter sensitivity of horizontal bearing capacity of large diameter and super-long bored pile [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1825-1833.
[2] LIU Sun, JIANG Ming-jing, FU Chang, ZHU Jun-gao,. Distinct element analysis of cone penetration tests in structured sand ground [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 933-942.
[3] LI Lei, JIANG Ming-jing, ZHANG Fu-guang, . Quantitative simulation of triaxial test considering residual strength on deep rock using DEM and parameter analysis [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1082-1090.
[4] TIAN Mi, ZHANG Fan, LI Li-hua, . Comparative study on the quantitative analysis methods of inherent spatial variability of soil properties based on indirect test data [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4673-4680.
[5] ZHANG Fu-guang, JIANG Ming-jing, . Distinct element analysis of plane strain test on soil unloading around a foundation pit [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 339-348.
[6] LIN Jun, CAI Guo-jun, LIU Song-yu, ZOU Hai-feng, . Identification of soil layer boundaries using mechanical layered method base on piezocone penetration test data [J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1413-1423.
[7] DONG Lin, WANG Lan-min, XIA Kun, YUAN Xiao-ming,. Comparison of CPT-based and SPT-based liquefaction discrimination methods by Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake data [J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3643-3648.
[8] TIAN Mi, LI Dian-qing, CAO Zi-jun, PHOON Kok-kwang, WANG Yu,. Quantification of spatial variability of soil parameters using Bayesian approaches [J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3355-3362.
[9] SHEN Hua-zhang, GUO Ming-wei, WANG Shui-lin, GE Xiu-run. Vector sum method for slope stability analysis based on discrete elements [J]. , 2016, 37(2): 592-600.
[10] HE Jie , JIANG Ming-jing , . Macro-micro mechanical property of pore-filling type methane hydrate-bearing sediment in true triaxial tests based on distinct element analysis [J]. , 2016, 37(10): 3026-3034.
[11] ZOU Hai-feng, CAI Guo-jun, LIU Song-yu, LIN Jun. Research on modeling inherent spatial variability of piezocone penetration test cone tip resistance based on geostatistics [J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 403-407.
[12] CHU Ya, LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, . Research and development of calibration chamber model test with in-situ injection device [J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 452-458.
[13] YANG Li-fu , CHANG Xiao-lin , ZHOU Wei , CHENG Yong-gang , MA Gang , . Deep anti-sliding stability analysis of gravity dam with multiple sliding planes based on distinct element method [J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1463-1470.
[14] JIANG Ming-jing , ZHANG Ning , SHEN Zhi-fu , CHEN He,. DEM analyses of crack propagation in flawed rock mass under uniaxial compression [J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3293-3300.
[15] JIANG Ming-jing, HE Jie, . A distinct element analysis of critical state passive earth pressure against a rigid wall using a rolling resistance contact model [J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2996-3006.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WANG Gang, LI Shu-cai, WANG Ming-bin. Study of stability of anchoring jointed rockmass under seepage pressure[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] LIU Yu-cheng,CAO Shu-gang,LIU Yan-bao. Discussion on some time functions for describing dynamic course of surface subsidence due to mining[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925 -931 .
[3] LIU En-long. Breakage mechanics for geomaterials: Breakage mechanism of structural blocks and binary-medium model[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 13 -22 .
[4] JIE Yu-xin, YANG Guang-hua. Modification of elastoplastic models based on generalized potential theory[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[5] YANG Jian-min, ZHENG Gang. Classification of seepage failures and opinion to formula for check bursting instability in dewatering[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[6] ZHOU Hua,WANG Guo-jin1,,FU Shao-jun,ZOU Li-chun,CHEN Sheng-hong. Finite element analysis of foundation unloading and relaxation effects of Xiaowan Arch Dam[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[7] YE Fei, ZHU He-hua, HE Chuan. Back-filled grouts diffusion model and its pressure to segments of shield tunnel[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[8] CHEN Lin, ZHANG Yong-xing, RAN Ke-xin. A method for calculating active earth pressure considering shear stress[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 219 -223 .
[9] GONG Wei-ming, HUANG Ting, DAI Guo-liang. Experimental study of key parameters of high piled foundation for offshore wind turbine[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[10] WANG Cheng-bing. Laboratory and numerical investigation on failure process of tunnel constructed in homogeneous rock[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 103 -108 .