Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 2221-2228.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1417

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Laboratory test of micro-nano Ca(OH)2 reinforced earthen sites

GUO Qing-lin1, 2, LI Ping1, 3, ZHANG Bo2, 3, PEI Qiang-qiang2, 3, WANG Yang-wu2, SHUI Bi-wen2, SUN Man-li1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Cultural Heritage Research and Conservation, China-Central Asia “the Belt and Road” Joint Laboratory on Human and Environment Research, School of Culture Heritage, Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710127; 2. Gansu Provincial Research Center for Conservation of Dunhuang Cultural Heritage, Dunhuang Academy, Dunhuang, Gansu 736200, China; 3. Gansu Mogao Grottoes Cultural Heritage Protection Design Consulting Co., Ltd., Dunhuang, Gansu 736200, China
  • Received:2022-09-13 Accepted:2022-12-05 Online:2023-08-21 Published:2023-08-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2020YFC1522200) and the Dunhuang Science and Technology Program Project (2023CA1009).

Abstract: Inorganic materials with strong compatibility and durability are widely used in the conservation of earthen sites, and those with especially loose structure has been the research focus of earthen sites reinforcement. Micro-nano Ca(OH)2 has a range of characteristics, including small molecular structure, significant reinforcement effect and good durability. Take the UNESCO world heritage site at Suoyang City as an example, we prepared the loose soil samples with the density of 1.5 g/cm3, then, the samples are enforced by micro-nano Ca(OH)2 suspension with concentration of 5%, 7.5% and 10%, respectively. Through the tests of air permeability, color difference, unconfined compressive strength and shear strength, it is found that the decrease value of air permeability is within 2%, and the color difference (ΔEab*) treated by 5% and 7.5% micro-nano Ca(OH)2 suspension is less than 4, to certain degree, which is acceptable. The compressive strength and shear strength are improved after three rounds of reinforcement using the suspension with concentration of 7.5%. Meanwhile, the unconfined compressive strength increases by 9.8%, and the cohesion of soil increases by 34%. The internal friction angle grows up by 9°. The soil-water characteristic curve shows that micro-nano Ca(OH)2 has a good inhibitory effect on the volumetric shrinkage of soil samples. The reinforcement mechanism is revealed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetric analysis. It is found a series of physicochemical reactions occurred in the alkaline environment after the treatment of micro-nano Ca(OH)2. From the physical perspective, loose samples are enhanced by filling, wrapping, and mosaic. In terms of chemical perspective, the carbonation of calcium hydroxide forms new calcareous cements, which is the primary reason of reinforcement. This study reveals that micro-nano Ca(OH)2 has potential for the anti-weathering and reinforcement of earthen sites.

Key words: earthen sites, weatherproof materials, preservation of cultural relics, laboratory test

CLC Number: 

  • TU 43
[1] LI Xin-ming, ZHANG Hao-yang, WU Di, GUO Yan-rui, REN Ke-bin, TAN Yun-zhi, . Strength deterioration characteristics of lime-metakaolin improved earthen site soil under freeze-thaw cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1593-1603.
[2] ZHANG Tao, XU Wei-ya, MENG Qing-xiang, WANG Huan-ling, YAN Long, QIAN Kun, . Experimental investigation on the mechanical characteristics of columnar jointed rock mass samples based on 3D printing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 245-254.
[3] DONG Qi, WANG Yuan, FENG Di, . Discrete element simulation and experimental study on the initiation pressure of hydraulic fracturing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(12): 3270-3280.
[4] SHARAFUTDINOV Rafael. Statistical and regression analyses of sands stiffness in triaxial tests and application of the results [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(10): 2873-2886.
[5] MA Cheng-hao, ZHU Chang-qi, LIU Hai-feng, CUI Xiang, WANG Tian-min, JIANG Kai-fang, YI Ming-xing, . State-of-the-art review of research on the particle shape of soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(8): 2041-2058.
[6] CUI Kai, YU Xiang-peng, PEI Qiang-qiang, WANG Xiao-hai, XU Peng-fei, . Influence of grouting mode on the adhesion property of slurry-soil interface for fissure reinforcement of earthen sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(6): 1501-1511.
[7] CUI Wei, ZOU Xu, LI Zheng, JIANG Zhi-an, XIE Wu, . Experimental study on seepage diffusion movement in fractal rock fractures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(11): 3553-3562.
[8] HE Fa-guo, LÜ Ran, SU Hua-zhong, ZHOU Jin, ZHANG Jing-ke, WANG Nan, . Durability test and reinforced mechanism on adding SH materials into soil of archaeological sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 297-307.
[9] CUI Kai, HUANG Jing-jing, CHEN Wen-wu, WANG Dong-hua, HAN Ning, . Research on selection of anchor slurry and performance of mixed quick lime in earthen sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2183-2191.
[10] ZHANG Jing-ke, SHAN Ting-ting, WANG Yu-chao, WANG Nan, FAN Meng, ZHAO Lin-yi, . Mechanical properties of soil-grout interface of anchor system in earthen sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 903-912.
[11] CHEN Wen-wu, ZHANG Qi-yong, LIU Hong-wei, . Infiltration grouting diffusion law of SH agent in earthen sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 429-435.
[12] CUI Kai, FENG Fei, CHEN Wen-wu, WANG Xiao-hai, CHENG Fu-qiang, . Study on the mechanical compatibility of fissure grouting slurry with quick lime and grouting technology optimization in earthen sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4627-4636.
[13] ZHANG Cong, LIANG Jing-wei, ZHANG Jian, YANG Jun-sheng, ZHANG Gui-jin, YE Xin-tian,. Mechanism of Bingham fluid permeation and diffusion based on pulse injection [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2740-2746.
[14] PEI Qiang-qiang, WANG Xu-dong, GUO Qing-lin, ZHANG Bo,ZHAO Guo-jing, ZHAO Jian-zhong, . Laboratory test of deformation mechanism of rammed roof-propping reinforcement at earthen heritage sites in arid environment [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2755-2764.
[15] WANG Jun, WANG Chuang, HE Chuan, HU Xiong-yu, JIANG Ying-chao,. Heading stability analysis of EPB shield tunnel in sandy cobble ground using laboratory test and 3D DEM simulation [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3038-3046.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[3] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[4] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[5] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[6] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[7] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[8] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[9] LU Zheng, YAO Hai-lin, LUO Xing-wen, HU Meng-ling. 3D dynamic responses of layered ground under vehicle loads[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2965 -2970 .
[10] SUN Yong. Research on calculation method of double-row anti-sliding structure under sliding surface[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2971 -2977 .