岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 3899-3912.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0005CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0005

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

既有−新建并排组合桩板墙嵌固段桩前被动土拱效应研究

马学宁1,王乐1, 2,白帆1,刘晨阳1,藏魏通1   

  1. 1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070;2. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-03 接受日期:2025-04-08 出版日期:2025-12-11 发布日期:2025-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 王乐,女,1998年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡稳定性和支挡结构方面的研究。E-mail: wl220254@163.com
  • 作者简介:马学宁,男,1974年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事铁道工程与岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: maxuening@mail.lzjtu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41562014,No.42361019);中央引导地方科技发展资金(No.22ZY1QA005)。

Passive soil arching effect in front of piles in embedded section of existing-new side-by-side composite pile-sheet wall

MA Xue-ning1, WANG Le1, 2, BAI Fan1, LIU Chen-yang1, ZANG Wei-tong1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2025-01-03 Accepted:2025-04-08 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41562014, 42361019) and the Central Guidance for Local Scientific and Technological Development Funding Project (22ZY1QA005).

摘要: 以中兰客专引入兰州枢纽工程的组合桩板墙为研究对象,采用现场监测与数值模拟相结合的方法,对既有−新建并排组合桩板墙嵌固段桩前被动土拱效应进行系统研究。通过现场监测获取新桩桩身变形、弯矩及桩前接触土压力等关键参数,并建立三维有限元模型进行对比验证。基于数值模拟结果,深入分析了组合桩板墙桩前被动土拱的形成机制、演化规律、几何特征及空间形态。研究表明:既有桩和新桩的桩前接触土压力呈上大下小的抛物线分布,在帮填路堤和列车荷载作用下,既有桩桩前接触土压力增量小于新桩;随新增荷载的增加,两桩桩身位移增大,与桩间土体产生显著位移差,导致桩间土体主应力方向偏转,在既有桩和新桩间形成桩前被动土拱;被动土拱演化过程分为以下几个阶段:既有路堤荷载作用下,既有桩前形成稳定土拱;新桩桩孔开挖应力释放范围有限,既有桩前土拱仍存在;随新增荷载的增大,新桩和既有桩桩前土体应力出现重合区,导致应力重分布;既有桩前原有土拱消失,在新桩与既有桩间逐渐重构形成新的被动土拱。路堤帮宽前后,随荷载的增加,被动土拱厚度基本恒定,但矢跨比逐渐增大;相同工况下,土拱厚度和矢跨比随埋深增加而减小。研究成果可为新型组合桩板墙的设计与施工提供参考。

关键词: 路堤帮宽, 既有-新建, 并排组合桩板墙, 被动土拱重构, 土拱几何形态

Abstract: This study uses the composite pile-sheet wall introduced into the Lanzhou hub project by the Zhongwei–Lanzhou passenger dedicated line as the research object, and employs a combined field monitoring and numerical simulation approach to systematically investigate the passive soil-arch effect in front of piles in the embedded section of the existing–new side-by-side pile-sheet wall. Field monitoring yields measurements of pile deformation, bending moment, and soil pressure in front of the new pile, and a three-dimensional finite element (FE) model is constructed for comparative verification. Based on the numerical simulation results, an in-depth analysis is conducted of the formation mechanism, evolution, geometric characteristics, and spatial configuration of the passive soil arch in front of the composite pile-sheet wall. The results show that the contact soil pressure in front of both the existing and the new piles follows a parabolic distribution, with larger values near the surface and smaller values at depth. Under embankment widening and train loading, the increase in contact soil pressure in front of the existing piles is smaller than that in front of the new piles. As the loads on the new pile increase, both piles experience greater displacements, creating a substantial displacement difference with the soil between them. This causes the principal-stress direction in the inter-pile soil to deviate and leads to the formation of a passive soil arch in front of both the existing and the new piles. The evolution of the passive soil arch can be divided into the following stages. Under the load from the existing embankment, a stable soil arch forms in front of the existing pile. The stress relief caused by excavating the new pile holes is limited in extent, and the soil arch in front of the existing piles remains intact. With the increase of new load, the stress of the soil in front of the new and the existing piles overlaps, resulting in stress redistribution. The original soil arch in front of the existing pile disappears, and a new passive soil arch forms progressively between the new and existing piles. Before and after the embankment widening, as the load increases, the thickness of the passive soil arch remains relatively constant, but the rise-span ratio gradually increases. Under the same working conditions, the soil arch thickness and the rise-span ratio decrease with increasing burial depth. The research results can provide reference for the design and construction of new composite pile-sheet wall.

Key words: embankment widening, existing-new, side-by-side composite pile-sheet wall, passive soil arching reconstruction, soil arching geometric shape

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 聂庆科, 张海清, 杨海朋, 贾向新, 张日华. 赤泥−粉煤灰地聚物桩的开发与现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3683-3693.
[2] 张军, 谭晓慧, 刘善伟, 查甫生, 王巧. 考虑降雨作用的空间变异膨胀土中不同桩长布桩模式下群桩可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3885-3898.
[3] 程小俊, 魏宁, 蒋睿, 宋亚亚, 何忠意, . 基桩自平衡静载试验总位移法及模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3934-3943.
[4] 鄂天龙, 崔强, 孙志亮, 冯杨州, 李冰臻, 缪栋, 杨健, 苗田, . 新型短柱斜桩复合基础结构优化与承载机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[5] 王长虹, 蔡德雍, 胡子轩, 杨天笑. 扰动状态下束浆挤扩桩抗拔机制与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[6] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[7] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[8] 崔纪飞, 吴祯祯, 李林, 饶平平, . 考虑土体流变的新旧混合群桩变刚度调平研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1897-1906.
[9] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[10] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[11] 雷国平, 吴泽雄, 苏栋, 莫烨强, 程马遥, . 考虑桩身材料非线性的微型抗滑桩计算p-y[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 337-348.
[12] 孙旻洋, 王忠瑾, 谢新宇, 张日红, 娄扬, 朱大勇, . 饱和黏土中能源群桩热力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 382-390.
[13] 肖荣军, 马威, 李锋, 袁丽云. 一种深基坑排桩支护结构内力位移矩阵分析法 解答及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 579-595.
[14] 崔凯, 于翔鹏, 吴国鹏, 许鹏飞, 葛诚瑞, . 桩-浆联合模式下土遗址裂隙注浆加固机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 607-618.
[15] 冷伍明, 丁荣锋, 杨奇, 陈琛, 邓煜晨, 徐方, 阮波, . 粗糙度对单桩竖向承载变形特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1597-1607.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!