岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7): 2367-2379.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.00365CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.00365

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

常规压缩下含轴向孔道灰岩力学行为及 分形本构模型研究

王南云1,刘新荣1, 2, 3,钟祖良1, 2, 3,朱开新1   

  1. 1.重庆大学 土木工程学院, 重庆 400045;2.煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室, 重庆 400044; 3.山地城镇建设新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400045
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-01 接受日期:2025-12-05 出版日期:2026-07-13 发布日期:2026-07-09
  • 通讯作者: 钟祖良,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石力学、边坡工程和隧道工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: haiou983@126.com
  • 作者简介:王南云,男,1996年生,博士,主要从事岩石力学与隧道工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: wny@cqu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52474092,No.52074042)。

Mechanical properties and fractal damage constitutive model of holed limestone under conventional compression

WANG Nan-yun1, LIU Xin-rong1, 2, 3, ZHONG Zu-liang1, 2, 3, ZHU Kai-xin1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing, 400044, China; 3. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of Ministry of Education, Chongqing, 400045, China
  • Received:2025-08-01 Accepted:2025-12-05 Online:2026-07-13 Published:2026-07-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52474092, 52074042).

摘要: 地下溶蚀作用的发展会在灰岩中形成大量空腔,从而影响岩溶山体的稳定性。为研究不同围压 和溶蚀程度 条件下含孔灰岩的峰值强度、裂纹贯通行为、能量特征及破坏模式,对具有不同孔数和孔径的岩样开展了常规压缩试验。结果表明,含孔灰岩的单轴抗压强度和裂纹贯通应力 与溶蚀程度 无明显相关性。在三轴压缩条件下,含孔灰岩的峰值强度可由线性Mohr-Coulomb准则描述。随着溶蚀程度增大,黏聚力c和裂纹贯通比 / 增大,最大增幅分别为14.04%和14.1%。峰值强度 、内摩擦角 和能量储存系数随溶蚀程度增大而降低,最大降幅分别为14.11%、12.86%和9.72%。在相同溶蚀程度条件下,孔径对含孔灰岩各参数变化的影响大于孔数的影响。峰值强度 、裂纹贯通应力 、裂纹贯通比 / ,和能量储存系数Ke均随围压增大而增大。含孔灰岩的破坏模式不受孔数显著影响。当孔径大于15 mm时,试样表现为锥形剪切破坏。建立了含孔灰岩分形损伤本构模型,理论结果与试验结果具有较好一致性,验证了所提模型的合理性。研究结论可为含孔灰岩力学行为及岩溶滑坡稳定性研究提供参考。

关键词: 含孔灰岩, 分形维数, 裂纹贯通应力, 能量特征, 本构模型

Abstract:

The development of underground dissolution leads to the formation of numerous cavities in limestone, thereby affecting the stability of karst mountain. Conventional compression tests were performed on rocks with different hole numbers and diameters to investigate the peak strength, crack damage behavior, energy characteristics and failure modes under different confining pressures (s3) and dissolution rates (h). The results indicate that the uniaxial compressive strength and crack damage stress (scd) of holed limestone are independent of the dissolution rate (h). Under triaxial compression, the peak strength of holed limestone can be described by a linear Mohr-Coulomb criterion. The cohesion (c) and crack damage ratio (scd/sp) increase with the increase of dissolution rate (h), with the maximum increases being 14.04% and 14.1%, respectively. The peak strength (sp), frictional angle (f), and energy storage coefficient (Ke) decrease with the increase of dissolution rate (h), with the maximum decreases being 14.11%, 12.86%, and 9.72%, respectively. At the same dissolution rate, the pore diameter (d) exerts a more significant influence on the variations of various parameters in holed limestone than the pore number (n). sp, scd, scd/sp, and Ke all increase with increasing confining pressure (s3). The failure mode of holed limestone is not affected by hole number, and exhibits a conical shear failure without penetrating through the specimen when the hole diameter is greater than 15mm. A fractal damage constitutive model was developed for holed limestone, and the consistency between theoretical predictions and experimental results substantiates the validity of the proposed model. The concluding remarks can provide a basis for further research on the holed limestone and karst landslides.

Key words: holed limestone, fractal dimension, crack damage stress, energy characteristic, constitutive model

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 宋思凡, 胡斌, 张翔宇, 李京, 黄磊, 李炳炎. 酸蚀作用下软弱夹层剪切特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2055-2070.
[2] 翁效林, 李铉聪, 姬国强, 许江波, 叶珊杉, 温博. 考虑结构性的饱和压实黏土的弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1207-1218.
[3] 杨贵, 张宇, 孙逸飞, 兰宜兵. 高聚物堆石料的应力分数阶塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1251-1261.
[4] 乔雅晴, 时振昊, 黄茂松, 张中杰, 王浩然. 基于颗粒间应变的黏土小应变弹塑性本构模型及开挖响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 929-938.
[5] 刘家顺, 周妮, 左建平, 郑智勇, 金佳旭. 富碱性水环境砂质泥岩孔隙结构演化与分形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 780-792.
[6] 赵康, 黄奇正, 石一辰, 马超, 冯印成, 田向勤, 刘浪. 不同粉煤灰掺量尾砂胶结充填体声发射与破坏预警特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 88-100.
[7] 陈志敏, 张政, 易明炀, 孙勇, 李开哲, 张溢博. 冻融环境下岩堆体细宏观损伤演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 198-208.
[8] 李明. 四参数随机生长法参数对多孔介质建模的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 349-358.
[9] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[10] 侯克鹏, 江帆, 张超, 龚晶汉, . 土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[11] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[12] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[13] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[14] 都海龙, 金爱兵, 秦文静, 商瑞豪, 王传江, 马赛, . 单轴压缩下水泥注浆煤岩力学性能及损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1521-1533.
[15] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!