岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1207-1218.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0329CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0329

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑结构性的饱和压实黏土的弹塑性本构模型

翁效林1,李铉聪1,姬国强2,许江波1,叶珊杉1,温博1   

  1. 1.长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064;2.陕西西咸海绵城市工程技术有限公司, 陕西 咸阳 712000
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-01 接受日期:2025-06-03 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 李铉聪,男,1999年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土与隧道工程方面的研究。E-mail: lixuancong1@chd.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:翁效林,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土与隧道工程方面的研究。E-mail: wengxl2000@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42277151);陕西省秦创原“科学家+工程师”队伍建设项目(No.S2024-YD-QCYK-0027);长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.300102214201);中国国家铁路集团有限公司科技研究开发计划实验室基础研究项目(No.L2022G014)。

Elastoplastic constitutive model for saturated compacted structured clays

WENG Xiao-lin1, LI Xuan-cong1, JI Guo-qiang2, XU Jiang-bo1, YE Shan-shan1, WEN Bo1   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. Shaanxi Xixian Sponge City Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., Xianyang, Shaanxi 712000, China
  • Received:2025-04-01 Accepted:2025-06-03 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42277151), the Qinchuangyuan “Scientist + Engineer” Team Building Project of Shaanxi Province (S2024-YD-QCYK-0027), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD (300102214201) and the Science and Technology Research and Development Project of China State Railway Group Co., Ltd. (L2022G014).

摘要: 结构性黏土由于特殊的胶结结构与颗粒空间排列形态,表现出与重塑土截然不同的工程特性。通过分析结构性黏土等向压缩过程中的结构演化特点,提出了一种基于屈服应力的结构演化规律数学模型。模型将屈服应力直接作为表征初始结构性的参数,避免引入额外初始结构性参数。通过分析结构性黏土压缩曲线建立了结构演化指标与屈服应力之间的关系,并引入了受塑性体应变和塑性偏应变共同影响的结构演化机制。在此基础上,将该结构演化模型引入统一硬化模型框架,建立了综合考虑初始状态与结构演化的弹塑性本构模型。除修正剑桥模型的参数外,该结构性模型仅需4个额外参数,且均可通过常规物理力学试验获得。通过模拟某假设土的压缩及剪切过程,对模型的预测能力进行验证。结果显示模型能够准确描述压实结构性黏土的非线性体积压缩,剪切导致的偏应力峰值及应变软化,以及结构随塑性体应变及塑性偏应变的演化等力学特性。通过与泾阳黄土等多种结构性土在不同应力路径下的试验数据对比,验证了模型的适用性与合理性。研究结果为理解压实结构性土体的力学行为提供了新的理论视角,对结构性黏土地区的工程实践具有指导意义。

关键词: 压实黏土, 结构演化, 本构模型, 屈服应力, 粒间胶结

Abstract: Structured clays exhibit engineering properties distinctly different from remoulded soils due to their unique cementation structure and spatial particle arrangement. By analysing the structural evolution characteristics of structured clay during isotropic compression, this study proposes a mathematical model for structural evolution based on yield stress. The model directly utilizes yield stress as a parameter characterizing initial structure, eliminating the need for additional initial structural parameters. Through analysis of compression curves, a relationship between structural evolution and yield stress was established, and a structural evolution mechanism influenced by both plastic volumetric strain and plastic deviatoric strain was introduced. Based on this foundation, the structural evolution model was incorporated into a unified hardening model framework, resulting in an elastoplastic constitutive model that comprehensively considers both initial state and structure. Beyond the parameters of the modified Cam-clay model, this structural model requires only 4 additional parameters, all obtainable through conventional physical and mechanical tests. The predictive capability of the model was verified by simulating compression and shearing processes of a hypothetical soil. Results demonstrate that the model accurately describes mechanical and deformation characteristics of compacted structured clay, including nonlinear volumetric compression, deviatoric stress peaks and strain softening during shearing, and structural evolution with plastic volumetric and deviatoric strains. The applicability and validity of the model were further verified through comparison with experimental data from various structured soils, including Jingyang loess, under different stress paths. The research findings provide a new theoretical perspective for understanding the mechanical behaviour of compacted structured soils, offering practical guidance for engineering applications in regions with structured clay deposits.

Key words: compacted clay, structure evolution, constitutive model, yield stress, interparticle bonding

中图分类号: TU 431
[1] 杨贵, 张宇, 孙逸飞, 兰宜兵. 高聚物堆石料的应力分数阶塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1251-1261.
[2] 乔雅晴, 时振昊, 黄茂松, 张中杰, 王浩然. 基于颗粒间应变的黏土小应变弹塑性本构模型及开挖响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 929-938.
[3] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[4] 侯克鹏, 江帆, 张超, 龚晶汉, . 土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[5] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[6] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[7] 都海龙, 金爱兵, 秦文静, 商瑞豪, 王传江, 马赛, . 单轴压缩下水泥注浆煤岩力学性能及损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1521-1533.
[8] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[9] 张春顺, 林正鸿, 杨典森, 陈嘉瑞, . 考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 750-760.
[10] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[11] 童森杰, 黄茂松, 时振昊, 王滨. 砂土全应变范围非线性特性对贯入大变形问题的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3707-3714.
[12] 杨楠, 邓亚虹, 刘雪娅, 慕焕东. 黄土蠕变变形特征及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3797-3810.
[13] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[14] 杨科, 于祥, 何祥, 侯永强, 张连富, . 不同含水状态矸石胶结充填体能量演化与损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 26-42.
[15] 王番, 郅彬, 刘恩龙, 王小婵, 邓博团, 李金华, 张辉, . 考虑局部胶结破损热力学行为的结构性黄土二元介质本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 97-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!