岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 3985-3997.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0282CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0282

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于支持向量机的土体地震液化判别模型

范猛1, 2,杨正权1, 2,李敬军1, 2,刘小生1, 2,赵剑明1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国水利水电科学研究院 流域水循环与水安全全国重点实验室,北京 100038; 2. 水利部水工程抗震与应急支持工程技术研究中心,北京 100048
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-18 接受日期:2025-05-26 出版日期:2025-12-11 发布日期:2025-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 杨正权,男,1980年生,博士,正高级工程师,博士生导师,主要从事土动力学与土工结构抗震研究。E-mail: yangzhq@iwhr.com
  • 作者简介:范猛,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事土动力学与土工结构抗震研究。E-mail: fanmeng@edu.iwhr.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划课题(No. 2017YFC0404905);中国水科院基本科研业务费专项(No.GE0145B052021);中国水科院科技成果转化基金专项(No.GE121003A0032024,No.GE121003A0032022)。

Soil seismic liquefaction discrimination model based on support vector machine

FAN Meng1, 2, YANG Zheng-quan1, 2, LI Jing-jun1, 2, LIU Xiao-sheng1, 2, ZHAO Jian-ming1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Water Security, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China; 2. Engineering Research Center on Anti-Earthquake and Emergency Support Techniques of Hydraulic Projects, Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2025-03-18 Accepted:2025-05-26 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0404905), the China Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research Basic Research Funds Special Project (GE0145B052021) and the China Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation Fund (GE121003A0032024, GE121003A0032022).

摘要: 土体液化可能性评价是砂土液化研究的重要任务之一。基于现场液化调查案例,通过灰色关联度法给出了各因素与液化之间的关联度,并从地震动荷载、土体环境和土体性质3个方面分析了各因素与液化之间的关系。采用支持向量机算法和普拉特缩放原理构建了砂土液化判别概率模型,与现有的确定性和概率性液化判别方法进行了对比研究,验证了模型的有效性。将模型应用于实际工程案例,探究了模型的实用性。结果表明:各因素与液化有明显的关联关系且影响关系复杂。建立的支持向量机土体液化判别模型对测试集与验证集的总体判别精度分别达到了89.41%、86.67%,与现有液化判别方法的判别结果相比,具有较好的判别精度。模型拓宽了土体液化判别的适用深度,同时可给出待评价土体的液化概率。研究成果可为土体地震液化概率评价提供一定的参考。

关键词: 地震, 灰色关联度, 支持向量机, 液化评价

Abstract: One of the important tasks in the study of sand liquefaction is to assess soil liquefaction likelihood. Based on the field liquefaction investigation cases, the correlation degree between each factor and liquefaction was given by grey relational degree method, and the relationships between factors from seismic load, soil environment, soil properties and liquefaction were analyzed. The support vector machine (SVM) algorithm and Platt scaling principle were then used to construct a probabilistic model for liquefaction assessment, and comparative study was conducted with existing deterministic and probabilistic liquefaction assessment methods to analyze its effectiveness. The model was then applied to actual engineering cases and its practicality was explored finally. The results indicate that it has a significant correlation with liquefaction and the influence relationship between each factor and liquefaction is complex. The overall classification accuracy of the SVM-based soil liquefaction assessment model was 89.41% for the test set and 86.67% for the validation set, higher than that of existing liquefaction assessment methods. The depth range of applicability is extended, and the model can also provide the soil liquefaction probability. The results provide a reference for probabilistic assessment of soil seismic liquefaction.

Key words: earthquake, grey relational degree, support vector machine, liquefaction assessment

中图分类号: TU435
[1] 赵武胜, 周帅, 解佩瑶, 高厚, 秦长坤, 陈卫忠, . 考虑初衬−二衬界面效应下隧道地震易损性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 477-490.
[2] 余小越, 许明, 谢强, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, . SH波在三角形山体地形中的散射与能量分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2639-2649.
[3] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[4] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[5] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[6] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[7] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[8] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[9] 王滢, 刘嘉怡, 高盟, 孔祥霄, . 地震作用下深海含气能源土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[10] 刘中宪, 孙文哲, 黄振恩, 贺维国. 基于IBEM-DEM耦合方法的近断层边坡动力响应模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3944-3957.
[11] 巴振宁, 徐光景, 阔晨阳, 梁建文, . 基于OpenSees的地震动输入方法开发:以土−桩−核岛结构相互作用分析为例[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3958-3972.
[12] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[13] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[14] 慕焕东, 邓亚虹, 赵勋昌, 何乃楠, 郑龙浩, 何也, . 基于非饱和剪切体变特征的马兰黄土液化评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3197-3207.
[15] 何颖, 陈雅, 尹奔驰, 刘中宪, 刘旭, . 频率相关等效线性山谷交错场地多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!